[1] Hussain H.M., Narayanan A., Nardelli P.H.J., Yang Y., What Is Energy Internet? Concepts, Technologies, and Future Directions, IEEE Access., vol. 8, pp. 183127–183145 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3029251.
[2] Tao Z., Jiahui J., Daolian C., An efficient and low-cost DMPPT approach for photovoltaic sub-module based on multi-port DC converter, Renewable Energy, vol. 178, pp. 1144–1155 (2021), DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.134.
[3] Jiang J., Zhang T., Chen D., Analysis, Design, and Implementation of a Differential Power Processing DMPPT With Multiple Buck–Boost Choppers for Photovoltaic Module, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 10214–10223 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2021.3063230.
[4] Xianglin L., Zhiwei X., Xueyu Y., Lixia Z., Wenzhong M., Wei H., Low-complexity multivector-based model predictive torque control for PMSM with voltage preselection, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 11726–11738 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/tepl.2021.3073137.
[5] Xianglin L., Zhiwei X., Lixia Z., Wei H., A low-complexity three-vector-based model predictive torque control for SPMSM, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 13002–13012 (2021), DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2532387.
[6] Rahbar K., Chai C.C., Zhang R., Energy cooperation optimization in microgrids with renew- able energy integration, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1482–1493 (2018), DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2016.2600863.
[7] Quint R. et al., Transformation of the grid: the impact of distributed energy resources on bulk power systems, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 35–45 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/mpe. 2019.2933071.
[8] Salem Q., Liu L., Xie J., Dual operation mode of a transformerless h-bridge inverter in low- voltage microgrid, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 5289–5299 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/tia.2019.2917807.
[9] Hanchao Z., Daolian C., A single-stage isolated charging/discharging DC-AC converter with sec- ond harmonic current suppression in distributed generation systems, IECON 2017 – 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Beijing, China, pp. 4427–4432 (2017).
[10] Liu S., He Y., Wang G., Wang M., Power Decoupling Control for Boost-Type Single-Phase Inverter with Active Power Buffer, 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Maryland, USA, pp. 2280–2285 (2019).
[11] Stawiarski Ł., Piróg S., Active power decoupling topology for AC-DC and DC-AC single-phase systems with decoupling capacitor minimization, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 193–205 (2018), DOI: 10.24425/aee.2018.119001.
[12] Xu S., Chang L., Shao R., Single-phase voltage source inverter with voltage Boosting and power decoupling capabilities, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2977–2988 (2020), DOI: 10.1109/jestpe.2019.2936136.
[13] Chen Z., Wu Q., Yuan Y., A novel zero-voltage-switching push–pull high-frequency-link single-phase inverter, IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 421–434 (2016), DOI: 10.1109/jestpe.2015.2505171.
[14] Watanabe H., Itoh J., Novel DC to single-phase AC isolated current source inverter with power decou- pling capability for micro-inverter system, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, pp. 158–165 (2015).
[15] Chakraborty S., Chattopadhyay S., An isolated Buck-Boost type high-frequency link photovoltaic microinverter, 2016 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, California, USA, pp. 3389–3396 (2016).
[16] Jiang J., Li Z., Chen D., A quasi single stage isolated Buck-Boost mode multi-input inverter, 2019 10th International Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia, Busan, Korea, pp. 1–6 (2019).
[17] Baoge Z., Deyu H., Tianpeng W., Zhen Z., Donghao W., A novel two-phase interleaved parallel bi-bidrectional DC/DC converter, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 219–234 (2021), DOI: 10.24425/aee.2021.136063.
[18] Hong F., Liu J., Ji B., Zhou Y., Wang J., Wang C., Single inductor dual Buck full-bridge inverter, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 4869–4877 (2015), DOI: 10.1109/tie.2015.2399280.
[19] Zhang L., Zhang T., Hao Y., Wang B., Two-stage dual-Buck grid-tied inverters with efficiency en-hancement, 2019 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, California, USA, pp. 3251–3256 (2019).
[20] Jagan V., Kotturu J., Das S., Enhanced-Boost quasi-z-source inverters with two-switched impedance networks, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 6885–6897 (2017), DOI: 10.1109/tie.2017.2688964.
[21] Zhu X., Zhang B., Qiu D., A high Boost active switched quasi-z-source inverter with low input current ripple, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 5341–5354 (2019), DOI: 10.1109/tii.2019.2899937.
[22] Leonardo P. Sampaio, Moacyr A.G. de Brito, Luigi G. Junior, Single-phase current-source-Boost inverter for renewable energy sources, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Gdansk, Poland, pp. 1118–1123 (2011), DOI: 10.1109/ISIE.2011.5984201.
[23] Nattymol Y.J., Shanavas T.N., Power quality analysis of single-phase transformer-less Buck-Boost inverter for compressor load, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS), Tamilnadu, India (2019), DOI: 10.1109/IN-COS45849.2019.8951345.
[24] Sreekanth T., Lakshmi Narasamma N., Mahesh K. Mishra, Sijo Augustine, A single stage cou- pled inductor based high gain DC-AC Buck-Boost inverter for photovoltaic (PV) applications, 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), New Orleans, LA, USA (2015), DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2015.7356269.
Accurate prediction of power loss distribution within an electrical device is highly desirable as it allows thermal behavior to be evaluated at the early design stage. Three-dimensional (3-D) and two-dimensional (2-D) finite element analysis (FEA) is applied to calculate dc and ac copper losses in the armature winding at high-frequency sinusoidal currents. The main goal of this paper is showing the end-winding effect on copper losses. Copper losses at high frequency are dominated by the skin and proximity effects. A time-varying current has a tendency to concentrate near the surfaces of conductors, and if the frequency is very high, the current is restricted to a very thin layer near the conductor surface. This phenomenon of nonuniform distribution of time-varying currents in conductors is known as the skin effect. The term proximity effect refers to the influence of alternating current in one conductor on the current distribution in another, nearby conductor. To evaluate the ac copper loss within the analyzed machine a simplified approach is adopted using one segment of stator core. To demonstrate an enhanced copper loss due to ac operation, the dc and ac resistances are calculated. The resistances ratio ac to dc is strongly dependent on frequency, temperature, shape of slot and size of slot opening.