Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Mercury is ranked third on the Substance Priority List, an index of substances determined to pose the most significant potential threat to human health compiled by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. This element is activated with the extraction of hard coal and accumulated in the natural environment or re-emitted from the waste deposited on dumping grounds. So far, studies on mercury content have focused on the analysis of the dumps surface and the adjacent areas. In this paper, the detection of mercury content inside mining waste dumping grounds was analysed. The recognition of mercury content in the profile of the mining waste dump is important in terms of the dismantling of the facility. The dismantling may pose a risk of environmental pollution with mercury due to the possibility of increased fire risk, re-emission, and the transfer of xenobiotics to another place. In this paper, the study of mercury content in the mining waste dump profile was presented. The research demonstrated that there is no significant relationship between the mercury content and the sampling depth. The mercury content in the mining waste was determined based on the rank and origin of hard coal only. Therefore, intensive efforts should be undertaken to identify the environmental hazards arising from the dismantling of mining waste dumps and to adopt measures to prevent these hazards.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] S.A. Musstjab, A.K. Bhowmik, S. Qamar, S.T. Abbas Shah, M. Sohail, S.I. Mulla, M. Fasola, H. Shen, Mercury contamination in deposited dust and its bioaccumulation patterns throughout Pakistan. Sci. Total Environ. 569-570, 585-593 (2016).
[2] X. Wang, Z. He, H. Luo, M. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Pan, G.M. Gadd, Multiple-pathway remediation of mercury contamination by a versatile selenite-reducing bacterium. Sci. Total Environ. 615 (15), 615-623 (2018).
[3] K . Halbach, Ø. Mikkelsen, T. Berg, E. Steinnes, The presence of mercury and other trace metals in surface soils in the Norwegian Arctic. Chemosphere 188, 567-574 (2017).
[4] D . Yu, H. Duan, Q. Song, X. Li, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. Liu, W. Shen, J. Wang, Characterizing the environmental impact of metals in construction and demolition waste. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 13823-13832 (2018).
[5] J. Yang, M. Takaoka, A. Sano, A. Matsuyama, R. Yanase, Vertical distribution of total mercury and mercury methylation in a landfill site in Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (6), 1252 (2018).
[6] K . Gogola, T. Rogala, M. Magdziarczyk, A. Smolinski, The mechanisms of endogenous fires occurring in extractive waste dumping facilities, Sustainability 12, 2856 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072856
[7] D . Raj, A. Chowdhury, S.K. Maiti, Ecological risk assessment of mercury and other heavy metals in soils of coal mining area: A case study from the eastern part of a Jharia coal field, India. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 23, 767-787 (2017).
[8] R . Fernández-Martínez, J.M. Esbrí, P. Higueras, I. Rucandio, Comparison of mercury distribution and mobility in soils affected by anthropogenic pollution around chloralkali plants and ancient mining sites. Sci. Total Environ. 671, 1066-1076 (2019).
[9] A. González-Martínez, M. de Simón-Martín, R. López, R. Táboas-Fernández, A. Bernardo-Sánchez, Remediation of potential toxic elements from wastes and soils: analysis and energy prospects. Sustainability 11, 3307 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123307
[10] U nited Nations Environment Programme, 2013. Global Mercury Assessment, Sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. Accessed: January 6, 2016 at: http://www.unep.org/PDF/PressReleases/GlobalMercuryAssessment2013.pdf.
[11] N . Howaniec, A. Smolinski, Biowaste utilization in the process of co-gasification with bituminous coal and lignite. Energy 118, 18-23 (2017).
[12] P. Krawczyk, N. Howaniec, A. Smolinski, Economic efficiency analysis of substitute natural gas (SNG) production in steam gasification of coal with the utilization of HTR excess heat. Energy 114, 1207-1213 (2016).
[13] A. Smolinski, N. Howaniec, Analysis of porous structure parameters of biomass chars versus bituminous coal and lignite carbonized at high pressure and temperature – chemometric study. Energies 10, 1457 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101457
[14] J. Zdeb, N. Howaniec, A. Smolinski, Utilization of carbon dioxide in coal gasification – an experimental study. Energies 12, 140 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12010140
[15] M. Sexauer, M. Gustin, M. Coolbaugh, B. Engle, R. Fitzgerald, S. Keislar, D. Lindberg, J. Nacht, J. Quashnick, C. Rytuba, H. Sladek, R. Zhang, R. Zehner, Atmospheric mercury emissions from mine wastes and surrounding geologically enriched terrains. Environ. Geol. 43, 339-351 (2003).
[16] F. Steenhuisen, S.J. Wilson, Development and application of an updated geospatial distribution model for gridding 2015 global mercury emissions. Atmosph. Environ. 211, 138-150 (2019).
[17] A. Michalska, B. Bialecka, A. Bauerek, The hazard of mercury contamination of the environment resulting from the disposal of mining waste. Science and technologies in geology, exploration and mining, Conference Proceedings 3, (2015). ISBN 978-619-7105-33-9 / ISSN 1314-2704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015B13
[18] T . Antoszczyszyn, A. Michalska, The potential risk of environmental contamination by mercury contained in coal mining waste. Journal of Sustainable Mining 15, 191-196 (2017).
[19] P. Rompalski, A. Smolinski, H. Krzton, J. Gazdowicz, N. Howaniec, L. Róg, Determination of mercury content in hard coal and fly ash using X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy coupled with chemical analysis. Arab. J. Chem. 12 (8), 3927-3942 (2019).
[20] B.G. Miller, Clean Coal Engineering Technology, Butterworth-Heinemann (2017). ISBN 978-0-12-811365-3.
[21] X. Bai, W. Li, Y. Wang, H. Ding, The distribution and occurrence of mercury in Chinese coals. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 4, 172-182 (2017).
[22] G . Ozbayoglu, Removal of hazardous air pollutants based on commercial coal preparation data. Physicochem. Probl. Miner Process. 49 (2), 621-629 (2013).
[23] H .N. Dougherty, A.P. Schissler, SME Mining Reference Handbook, second ed. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (2020). ISBN 978-0-87335-435-6.
[24] J.E. Gray, P.M. Theodorakos, D.L. Fey, D.P. Krabbenhoft, Mercury concentrations and distribution in soil, water, mine waste leachates, and air in and around mercury mines in the Big Bend region, Texas, USA, Environ. Geochem. Health 37, 35-48 (2015).
[25] T .B. Das, S.K. Pal, T. Gouricharan, K.K. Sharma, A. Choudhury, Evaluation of reduction potential of selected heavy metals from Indian coal by conventional coal cleaning. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 33, 300-312 (2013).
[26] T . Dziok, A. Strugala, A. Rozwadowski, M. Macherzynski, S. Ziomber, Mercury in the waste coming from hard coal processing. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi 31 (1), 107-122 (2015).
[27] B. Klojzy-Karczmarczyk, J. Mazurek, Mercury in soils surrounded by selected dumps of coal mining waste. Energy Policy 13 (2), 245-252 (2010).
[28] B. Klojzy-Karczmarczyk, J. Mazurek, Soil contamination with mercury compounds within the range of a conventional coal-fired power plant. Energy Policy 10 (2), 593-601 (2007).
[29] Ministry of Environment. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of September 9, 2002 on soil quality standards and land quality standards. Journal of Laws 165, 2002, item 1359.
[30] Mining Waste Act. Mining Waste Act (Journal of Laws No. 138 of 2008, 2008, item 865).
[31] Waste Act, 2016. The Waste Act. Journal of Laws of 2016, 2016, item 1987.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Michalska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Adam Smoliński
1
ORCID: ORCID
Aleksandra Koteras
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Central Mining Institute (GIG), 1 Gwarków Sq., 40-166 Katowice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article aims at presenting research on the sorption of carbon dioxide on shales, which will allow to estimate the possibility of CO2 injection into gas shales. It has been established that the adsorption of carbon dioxide for a given sample of sorbent is always greater than that of methane. Moreover, carbon dioxide is the preferred gas if adsorption takes place in the presence of both gases. In this study CO2 sorption experiments were performed on high pressure setup and experimental data were fitted into the Ambrose four components models in order to calculate the total gas capacity of shales as potential CO2 reservoirs. Other data necessary for the calculation have been identified: total organic content, porosity, temperature and moisture content. It was noticed that clay minerals also have an impact on the sorption capacity as the sample with lowest TOC has the highest total clay mineral content and its sorption capacity slightly exceeds the one with higher TOC and lower clay content. There is a positive relationship between the total content of organic matter and the stored volume, and the porosity of the material and the stored volume.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] A. Szurlej, P. Janusz, Natural gas economy in the United States and European markets. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi (Mineral Resources Management) 29 (4), 77-94 (2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gospo-2013-0043
[2] B. Dudley, BP Statistical Review of World Energy 4 (2019).
[3] J. Siemek, M. Kaliski, S. Rychlicki, P. Janusz, S. Sikora, A. Szurlej, Wpływ shale gas na rynek gazu ziemnego w Polsce. Rynek Energii 5, 118-124 (2011).
[4] K . Król, A. Dynowski, Eksploatacja gazu ziemnego z formacji łupkowych w Polsce – nadzieje i fakty (komunikat). Bezp. Pr. Ochr. Śr. w Gór. 10 (2015).
[5] M. Iijima, T. Nagayasu, T. Kamijyo, S. Nakatani, MHI’s Energy Efficient Flue Gas CO2 Capture Technology and Large Scale CCS Demonstration Test at Coal-fired Power Plants in USA. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review 49 (1), 37-43 (2012).
[6] R . Khosrokhavar, Mechanisms for CO2 sequestration in geological formations and enhanced gas recovery. Springer Theses (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:a27f5c1d-5fd2-4b1e-b757-8839c0c4726c
[7] D . Liu, Y. Li, S. Yang, R.K. Agarwal, CO2 sequestration with enhanced shale gas recovery. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 43 (24) 1-11 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1587069
[8] R . Heller, M. Zoback, Adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide on gas shale and pure mineral samples. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources 8, 14-24 (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2014.06.001
[9] J.A. Cecilia, C. García‐Sancho, E. Vilarrasa‐García, J. Jiménez‐Jiménez, E. Rodriguez‐Castellón, Synthesis, Characterization, Uses and Applications of Porous Clays Heterostructures: A Review. Chem. Rec. 18, 1085-1104 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201700107
[10] O.P. Ortiz Cancino, D. Peredo Mancilla, M. Pozo, E. Pérez, D. Bessieres, Effect of Organic Matter and Thermal Maturity on Methane Adsorption Capacity on Shales from the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin in Colombia. Energy Fuels 31, 11698-11709 (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01849
[11] S. Zhou, H. Xue, Y. Ning, W. Guo, Q. Zhang, Experimental study of supercritical methane adsorption in Longmaxi shale: Insights into the density of adsorbed methane. Fuel 211, 140-148 (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.065
[12] H . Bi, Z. Jiang, J. Li, P. Li, L. Chen, Q. Pan, Y. Wu, The Ono-Kondo model and an experimental study on supercritical adsorption of shale gas: A case study on Longmaxi shale in southeastern Chongqing, China. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 35, 114-121 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.047
[13] M. Gasparik, P. Bertier, Y. Gensterblum, A. Ghanizadeh, B.M. Krooss, R. Littke, Geological controls on the methane storage capacity in organic-rich shales. Int. J. Coal Geol., Special issue: Adsorption and fluid transport phenomena in gas shales and their effects on production and storage 123, 34-51 (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.06.010
[14] X. Luo, S. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Jing, M. Lv, Z. Zhai, T. Han, Adsorption of methane, carbon dioxide and their binary mixtures on Jurassic shale from the Qaidam Basin in China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 150, 210-223 (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2015.09.004
[15] L . Wang, Q. Yu, The effect of moisture on the methane adsorption capacity of shales: A study case in the eastern Qaidam Basin in China. J. Hydrol. 542, 487-505 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.018
[16] S.M. Kang, E. Fathi, R.J. Ambrose, I.Y. Akkutlu, R.F. Sigal, Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity of Organic-Rich Shales. SPE J. 16, 842-855 (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/134583-PA
[17] D .L. Gautier, J.K. Pitman, R.R. Charpentier, T. Cook, T.R. Klett, C.J. Schenk, Potential for Technically Recoverable Unconventional Gas and Oil Resources in the Polish-Ukrainian Foredeep. USGS Fact Sheet, 2012-3102 (2012).
[18] R . McCarthy, V. Arp, A New Wide Range Equation of State for Helium. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering 35, 1465-1475 (1990).
[19] R . Span, W. Wagner, A New Equation of State for Carbon Dioxide Covering the Fluid Region from the Triple‐Point Temperature to 1100 K at Pressures up to 800 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 25 (6), 1509-1596 (1996). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555991
[20] U . Setzmann, W. Wagner, A New Equation of State and Tables of Thermodynamic Properties for Methane Covering the Range from the Melting Line to 625 K at Pressures up to 100 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 20, 1061-1155 (1991). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555898
[21] M. Lutynski, M. A. Gonzalez Gonzalez, Characteristics of carbon dioxide sorption in coal and gas shale – The effect of particle size. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 28, 558-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.037
[22] R . Aguilera, Shale gas reservoirs: Theoretical, practical and research issues. Petroleum Research 1 (1), 10-26 (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2096-2495(17)30027-3
[23] H . Belyadi, E. Fathi, F. Belyadi, Hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs: theories, operations, and economic analysis. Gulf Professional Publishing (2016).
[24] K . Sepehrnoori, Y. Wei, Shale Gas and Tight Oil Reservoir Simulation. Elsevier (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ C2017-0-00263-X
[25] R .J. Ambrose, R.C Hartman, M. Diaz-Campos, I.Y. Akkutlu, C.H. Sondergeld, New Pore-scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/131772-MS
[26] R .J. Ambrose, R.C. Hartman, M. Diaz Campos, I.Y. Akkutlu, C.H. Sondergeld, Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part I: New Pore-Scale Considerations. Spe Journal 17 (01), 219-229 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/131772-PA
[27] P. Such, Co to właściwie znaczy porowatość skał łupkowych. Nafta-Gaz LXX (7), 411-415 (2014).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Patrycja Waszczuk-Zellner
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marcin Lutyński
2
ORCID: ORCID
Aleksandra Koteras
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. LNPC Patrycja Waszczuk, Pszczyna, Poland
  2. Silesian University of Technology, 2A Akademicka Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
  3. Central Mining Institute (GIG), 1 Gwarków Sq., 40-166 Katowice, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more