Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 8
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the breeding season 1988/89, within the region of SSSI No. 8, nesting of 12 species of birds was observed. The highest number of nests — 24430 — belonged to three species of pygoscelid penguins; 77.1% were the Adelie penguin. Relatively high fluctuations in the number of penguins in some rookeries in particular breeding seasons were confirmed. During regular countings of mammals' in 1988 the presence of 5 species of Pinnipedia was noted, of which the southern elephant seal was most numerous in the summer season, whereas crabeater seal — in winter. In the region of SSSI No. 8, breeding of southern elephant seal and Weddell seal was observed. Fluctuations in the number of seals in this region in the period 1977—1988 were insignificant.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kazimierz Sierakowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the results of seven-year survey of Antarctic seals along the western shore of Admiralty Bay, King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Five species were monitored during seven of the eight years, between 1988-95, excluding 1993. Numbers of elephant seals and Antarctic fur seals showed strong annual cycles, fur seals with two seasonal peaks. These of the other three species were more irregular. Fewer Weddell seals were seen in 1994 and 1995 then during the period 1988-92; with this exception, no overall trend in numbers was apparent during the period 1988-95.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Salwicka
Kazimierz Sierakowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper summarizes results of twenty years of seabird observations carried out between 1977 and 1996 on the western shore of Admiralty Bay (King George Island, South Shetlands, Antarctic). Changes in population size, distribution and phenology of the breeding species as well as the appearance of non-breeding species are reported. A total of 34 species of birds were observed, including 13 breeding species. Among the non-breeding species, four were observed to visit the site regularly, six rarely, and the remaining 11 were observed only occasionally. Among breeding populations, three Pygoscelis penguin species, the main krill consumers, were most numerous. The Adélie Penguin (P. adeliae) dominated among the penguins nesting in the investigated areas, reaching 23,661 breeding pairs in 1978. Two other penguin species were less abundant with population sizes of approximately 7,200 breeding pairs for the Chinstrap Penguin (P. antarcticus) and 3,100 breeding pairs for the Gentoo Penguin (P. papua) in the same year. During the following two decades, breeding populations of pygoscelid species experienced a declining trend and their numbers were reduced by 68.0% for Chinstrap, 67.1% for Gentoo, and 33.9% for Adélie Penguins. The data reported here represent a unique reference basis and provide valuable information about indicator species, suitable for comparison with contemporary observations of bird populations in the Antarctic Peninsula region, a place of rapidly occurring climate changes and intensive harvesting of marine living resources.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kazimierz Sierakowski
Małgorzata Korczak-Abshire
Piotr Jadwiszczak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Pinnipeds were monitored in Admiralty Bay between 1988 and 1992. No particular trends during this period were found, but seasonal changes in each are distinct. It is suggested that the phenology of pinnipeds and that of penguins ensures low competition for food between these groups.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stanisław Rakusa-Suszczewski
Kazimierz Sierakowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

We report on the absorption properties of polarization-insensitive transmissive and reflective metamaterial absorbers based on two planar aluminium periodic structures and SU-8 epoxy resist. These absorbers were investigated using numerical simulation and experimental methods in the terahertz range (below 2 THz). SU-8 is a very promising organic material for dielectric layers in planar metamaterials, because its application simplifies the process of fabricating these structures and significantly reduces the fabrication time. The experimental absorption of the metamaterial absorbers has narrowband characteristics that were consistent with the numerical simulations. Power flow analysis in the transmissive metamaterial unit cell shows that the absorption in the terahertz range occurs primarily in the SU-8 layer of the absorber.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

B. Grześkiewicz
A. Sierakowski
J. Marczewski
N. Pałka
E. Wolarz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the influence of various variants of bioleaching on effectivity of releasing chosen critical metals: rhodium, cadmium, indium, niobium and chromium from ashes which are a byproduct of municipal waste and sewage sludge thermal processing. The research was conducted in 3 variants that considered different process factors such as temperature (24ºC and 37ºC), mixing intensity and aeration. After 5 days of the process the analyses were made of metals content, sulfate concentration, pH, general number of bacteria number, index of sulfur oxidizing bacteria. The best results of bioleaching were achieved by running the process at the temperature of 24ºC with aeration. The efficiency of rhodium and cadmium release from the byproduct of municipal waste thermal processing was above 90%. The efficiency of indium and chromium release reached 50–60%. Only niobium leached better in mixing conditions. The byproduct of sewage sludge thermal processing was far less susceptible to bioleaching. The highest effectivity (on a level of 50%) was reached for indium in temperature of 24°C with aeration. The efficiency of bioleaching depended on waste’s physiochemical properties and type of metal which will be released. Aeration with compressed air had a positive influence on the increase of sulfur oxidizing bacteria what corresponded with almost double increase of sulfate concentration in leaching culture. Such conditions had a positive influence on the increase of the efficiency of bioleaching process. Heightening the temperature to 37°C and slowly mixing did not impact bioleaching in a positive way.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dorota A. Andrzejewska-Górecka
Agnieszka Poniatowska
Bartłomiej Macherzyński
Dominik Wojewódka
Maciej Sierakowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper, we present metrology and control methods and techniques for electromagnetically actuated microcantilevers. The electromagnetically actuated cantilevers belong to the micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS), which can be used in high resolution force and mass change investigations. In the described experiments, silicon cantilevers with an integrated Lorentz current loop were investigated. The electromagnetically actuated cantilevers were characterized using a modified optical beam deflection (OBD) system, whose architecture was optimized in order to increase its resolution. The sensitivity of the OBD system was calibrated using a reference cantilever, whose spring constant was determined through thermomechanical noise analysis registered interferometrically. The optimized and calibrated OBD system was used to observe the resonance and bidirectional static deflection of the electromagnetically deflected cantilevers. After theoretical analysis and further experiments, it was possible to obtain setup sensitivity equal to 5.28 mV/nm.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Binnig, G., Quate, C. F., & Gerber, C. (1986). Atomic force microscope. Physical Review Letters, 56(9), 930. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930
[2] Judy, J. W. (2001). Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS): fabrication, design and applications. Smart Materials and Structures, 10(6), 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/6/301
[3] Algamili, A. S., Khir, M. H. M., Dennis, J. O., Ahmed, A. Y., Alabsi, S. S., Hashwan, S. S. B., & Junaid, M. M. (2021). A review of actuation and sensing mechanisms in MEMS-based sensor devices. Nanoscale Research Letters, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-021-03481-7
[4] Woszczyna, M., Gotszalk, T., Zawierucha, P., Zielony, M., Ivanow, Tzv., Ivanowa, K., Sarov, Y., Nikolov, N., Mielczarski, J., Mielczarska, E., & Rangelow, I. W. (2009). Thermally driven piezoresistive cantilevers for shear-force microscopy. Microelectronic Engineering, 86(4), 1212–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2009.01.043
[5] Shen, B., Allegretto, W., Hu, M., & Robinson, A. M. (1996). CMOS micromachined cantileverin- cantilever devices with magnetic actuation. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 17(7), 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1109/55.506371
[6] Adhikari, R., Kaundal, R., Sarkar, A., Rana, P., & Das, A. K. (2012). The cantilever beam magnetometer: A simple teaching tool for magnetic characterization. American Journal of Physics, 80(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3679840
[7] Hsieh, C. H., Dai, C. L., & Yang, M. Z. (2013). Fabrication and Characterization of CMOS-MEMS Magnetic Microsensors. Sensors, 13(11), 14728–14739. https://doi.org/10.3390/s131114728
[8] Rhoads, J. F., Kumar, V., Shaw, S. W., & Turner, K. L. (2013). The non-linear dynamics of electromagnetically actuated microbeam resonators with purely parametric excitations. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 55, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.04.003
[9] Lee, B., Prater, C. B.,&King,W. P. (2012). Lorentz force actuation of a heated atomic force microscope cantilever. Nanotechnology, 23(5), 055709. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/5/055709
[10] Neuman, K. C., & Nagy, A. (2008). Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy. Nature Methods, 5(6), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1218
[11] Hoogenboom, B. W., Frederix, P. L. T. M., Yang, J. L., Martin, S., Pellmont, Y., Steinacher, M., Zäch, S., Langenbach, E., Heimbeck, H.-J., Engel, A., & Hug, H. J. (2005). A Fabry–Perot interferometer for micrometer-sized cantilevers. Applied Physics Letters, 86(7), 074101-1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1866229
[12] Meyer, G., & Amer, N. M. (1988). Novel optical approach to atomic force microscopy. Applied Physics Letters, 53(12), 1045–1047. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.100061
[13] Boisen, A., Dohn, S., Keller, S. S., Schmid, S., & Tenje, M. (2011). Cantilever-like micromechanical sensors. Reports on Progress in Physics, 74(3), 036101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/74/3/036101
[14] Gimzewski, J. K., Gerber, Ch., Meyer, E., & Schlittler, R. R. (1994). Observation of a chemical reaction using a micromechanical sensor. Chemical Physics Letters, 217(5), 589–594. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0009-2614(93)E1419-H
[15] Wu, G., Ji, H., Hansen, K., Thundat, T., Datar, R., Cote, R., Hagan, M. F., Chakraborty, A. K., & Majumdar, A. (2001). Origin of nanomechanical cantilever motion generated from biomolecular interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(4), 1560–1564. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.4.1560 [16] Nieradka, K., Kapczynska, K., Rybka, J., Lipinski, T., Grabiec, P., Skowicki, M.,&Gotszalk, T. (2014). Microcantilever array biosensors for detection and recognition of Gram-negative bacterial endotoxins. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 198, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.03.023
[17] Helm, M., Servant, J. J., Saurenbach, F., & Berger, R. (2005). Read-out of micromechanical cantilever sensors by phase shifting interferometry. Applied Physics Letters, 87(6), 064101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2008358
[18] Putman, C. A. J., de Grooth, B. G., van Hulst, N. F., & Greve, J. (1992). A theoretical comparison between interferometric and optical beam deflection technique for the measurement of cantilever displacement in AFM. Ultramicroscopy, 42, 1509–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(92) 90474-X
[19] Putman, C. A. J., de Grooth, B. G., van Hulst, N. F., & Greve, J. (1992). A detailed analysis of the optical beam deflection technique for use in atomic force microscopy. Journal of Applied Physics, 72(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.352149
[20] Hu, Z., Seeley, T., Kossek, S.,&Thundat, T. (2004). Calibration of optical cantilever deflection readers. Review of Scientific Instruments, 75(2), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1637457
[21] Fukuma, T., Kimura, M., Kobayashi, K., Matsushige, K., & Yamada, H. (2005). Development of low noise cantilever deflection sensor for multienvironment frequency-modulation atomic force microscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments, 76(5), 053704. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1896938
[22] Nieradka, K., Kopiec, D., Małozi˛ec, G., Kowalska, Z., Grabiec, P., Janus, P., Sierakowski, A., Domanski, K., & Gotszalk, T. (2012). Fabrication and characterization of electromagnetically actuated microcantilevers for biochemical sensing, parallel AFM and nanomanipulation. Microelectronic Engineering, 98, 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2012.06.019
[23] Miyatani, T., & Fujihira, M. (1997). Calibration of surface stress measurements with atomic force microscopy. Journal of Applied Physics, 81(11), 7099–7115. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.365306
[24] Mishra, R., Grange, W., & Hegner, M. (2012). Rapid and reliable calibration of laser beam deflection system for microcantilever-based sensor setups. Journal of Sensors, 2021, 617386. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/617386
[25] Naeem, S., Liu, Y., Nie, H. Y., Lau, W. M., & Yang, J. (2008). Revisiting atomic force microscopy force spectroscopy sensitivity for single molecule studies. Journal of Applied Physics, 104(11), 114504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3037206
[26] Lee, J., Beechem, T., Wright, T. L., Nelson, B. A., Graham, S., & King, W. P. (2006). Electrical, thermal, and mechanical characterization of silicon microcantilever heaters. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 15(6), 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2006.886020
[27] Skwierczynski, J. M., Małozi˛ec, G., Kopiec, D., Nieradka, K., Radojewski, J., & Gotszalk, T. (2011). Radio frequency modulation of semiconductor laser as an improvement method of noise performance of scanning probe microscopy position sensitive detectors. Optica Applicata, 41(2), 323–331.
[28] Butt, H.-J., & Jaschke, M. (1995). Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/6/1/001
[29] Ohler, B. (2007). Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry. Review of Scientific Instruments, 78(6), 063701. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2743272
[30] Cleveland, J. P., Manne, S., Bocek, D.,&Hansma, P. K. (1993).Anondestructive method for determining the spring constant of cantilevers for scanning force microscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments, 64(2), 403–405. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1144209
[31] Lévy, R., & Maaloum, M. (2002). Measuring the spring constant of atomic force microscope cantilevers: thermal fluctuations and other methods. Nanotechnology, 13(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1088/095-4484/13/1/307
[32] Rast, S.,Wattinger, C., Gysin, U.,&Meyer, E. (2000). The noise of cantilevers. Nanotechnology, 11(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/11/3/306
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Daniel Kopiec
1
Wojciech Majstrzyk
2
Bartosz Pruchnik
1
Ewelina Gacka
1
Dominik Badura
1
Andrzej Sierakowski
2
Paweł Janus
2
Teodor Gotszalk
1

  1. Wrocław University of Technology, Faculty of Microsystems Electronics and Photonics, Department of Nanometrology, Janiszewskiego 11/17, Wrocław 50-372, Poland
  2. Łukasiewicz Research Network, Institute of Microelectronics and Fotonics, Lotników 32/46, Warsaw 02-668, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a perfect technique for micro-/nano-object imaging [1] and movement measurement [2, 3] both in high and environmental vacuum conditions and at various temperatures ranging from elevated to low temperatures. In our view, the magnetic field expanding from the pole-piece makes it possible to characterize the behaviour of electromagnetic micro- and nano electromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS) in which the deflection of the movable part is controlled by the electromagnetic force. What must be determined, however, is the magnetic field expanding from the e-beam column, which is a function of many factors, like working distance (WD), magnification and position of the device in relation to the e-beam column. There are only a few experimental methods for determination of the magnetic field in a scanning electron microscope. In this paper we present a method of the magnetic field determination under the scanning electron column by application of a silicon cantilever magnetometer. The micro-cantilever magnetometer is a silicon micro-fabricated MEMS electromagnetic device integrating a current loop of lithographically defined dimensions. Its stiffness can be calibrated with a precision of 5% by the method described by Majstrzyk et al. [4]. The deflection of the magnetometer cantilever is measured with a scanning electron microscope and thus, through knowing the bias current, it is possible to determine the magnetic field generated by the e-beam column in a defined position and at a defined magnification.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karolina Orłowska
Maria E. Mognaschi
Krzysztof Kwoka
Tomasz Piasecki
Piotr Kunicki
Andrzej Sierakowski
Wojciech Majstrzyk
Arkadiusz Podgórni
Bartosz Pruchnik
Paolo di Barba
Teodor Gotszalk

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more