Wyniki wyszukiwania

Filtruj wyniki

  • Czasopisma
  • Date

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyników: 5
Wyników na stronie: 25 50 75
Sortuj wg:
Pobierz PDF Pobierz RIS Pobierz Bibtex

Abstrakt

The necessity of rational water resource management and reduction of water consumption demandsthat water utilities address water losses during water treatment. Therefore, the backwash water generated during the filtration process is often the focus of research aimed at its reuse within the water treatment system. The studies outlined here were conducted in a large water treatment plant (100,000 m3), focusing on the backwash water produced from sand bed filter flushing. Prior to its reintroduction into the treatment train, the backwash water underwent pre-treatment using ultrafiltration (UF) process with two different modules: a spiral module with a PVFD (200kDa) membrane and a capillary module with a PES (80kDa) membrane. The effectiveness of the process was evaluated based on the degree of retention of organic substances and microorganisms, which pose health risks in backwash water recirculation. The capillary membrane exhibited greater effectiveness in retaining these contaminants, thereby ensuring the complete elimination of pathogenic microorganisms. The study findings indicate that pre-treating backwash water using UF membranes and reintroducing it into the water treatment system before the ozonation process can lead to a reduction of environmental fees. However, this process results in a 1.5% increase in water treatment costs
Przejdź do artykułu

Bibliografia

  1. Ahmed, A.E., Majewska-Nowak, K. & Grzegorzek, M. (2021). Removal of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions using ultrafiltration membranes, Environment Protection Engineering 47, 3, pp. 109-120. DOI:10.37190/epe210309.
  2. Alhussaini, M.A., Binger, Z., M. Souza-Chaves, B. M., Amusat, O.O., Park, J., Bartholomew, T.V., Gunter, D. & Achilli, A. (2023). Analysis of backwash settings to maximize net water production in an engineering-scale ultrafiltration system for water reuse, Journal of Water Process Engineering 53, 103761. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103761.
  3. Chen, M., Shen, S., Zhang, F., Zhang, C. & Xiong, J. (2022). Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) removal from micro-polluted water source using ultrafiltration: comparison with conventional processes, operation conditions and membrane fouling control, Polymers. 14, 21, 4689. DOI:10.3390/polym14214689.
  4. Clostridium perfringens- An overview. https://microbenotes.com/clostridium-perfringens/ Accessed January 19, 2024.
  5. Collivignarelli, M.C., Abbà, A., Benigna, I., Sorlini, S. & Torretta, V. (2017) Overview of the main disinfection processes for wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Sustainability, 10, 86.
  6. Cordier, C., Stavrakakis, C., Morga, B., Degrémont, L., Voulgaris, A., Bacchi, A., Sauvade, P., Coelho, F. & Moulin, P. (2020). Removal of pathogens by ultrafiltration from sea water, Environment international, 142, 105809. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105809.
  7. Ćurko, J., Mijatović, I., Rumora, D., Crnek, V., Matošić, M. & Nežić, M. (2013). Treatment of spent filter backwash water from drinking water treatment with immersed ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination and Water Treatment, 51, 25-27, pp. 4901-4906. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.774142.
  8. de Souza, F.H., Pizzolatti, B.S. & Sens, M.L. (2021). Backwash as a simple operational alternative for small-scale slow sand filters: From conception to the current state of the art, Journal of Water Process Engineering 40, 101864. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101864.
  9. Ebrahimi, M.M., Amin, H., Pourzamani, Y., Hajizadeh, A.H., Mahvi, M.M. & Rad, M.H.R. (2017). Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl 3 as a pre-treatment, Environmental monitoring and assessment, 189, pp. 1-15.DOI:10.1007/s10661-017-6091-3. [Online]. Available: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-017-6091-3. Accessed 26 March 2024
  10. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. Drinking Water Treatment Plant Residuals Management Technical Report, Summary of Residuals Generation, Treatment, and Disposal at Large Community Water Systems. 2011.
  11. Gottfried, A., Shepard, A.D., Hardiman, K. & Walsh, M.E. (2008). Impact of recycling filter backwash water on organic removal in coagulation–sedimentation processes, Water Research, 42, 18, pp. 4683–4691. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.011.
  12. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 4th edition. 2017. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950.
  13. Guidelines to support the application of Regulation 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse (including Annexes). (2022/C 298/01). 2020. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/minimum-requirements-water-reuse-guidelines_en.
  14. Howe, K.J. & Clark, K. (2002). Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 16, pp. 3571-3576. DOI:10.1021/es025587r
  15. Li, W., Liang, X., Duan, J., Beechamb, S. & Mulcahy, D. (2018). Influence of spent filter backwash water recycling on pesticide removal in a conventional drinking water treatment process, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology, 4, pp. 1057-1067. DOI:10.1039/C7EW00530J.
  16. Lin, T., Zhang, J. & Chen, W. (2017). Recycling of activated carbon filter backwash water using ultrafiltration: membrane fouling caused by different dominant interfacial forces, Journal of Membrane Science, 544, pp. 174-185. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.028.
  17. Liu, P.Y., Chin, L.K., Ser, W., Ayi, T.C., Yap, P.H., Bourouina, T. & Leprince-Wang, Y. (2014). Real-time measurement of single bacterium’s refractive index using optofluidic immersion refractometry, Procedia Engineering, 87, pp. 356-359. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.743.
  18. Mahdavi, M., Ebrahimi, A., Azarpira, H., Tashauoei, H.R. & Mahvi, A.H. (2017). Dataset on the spent filter backwash water treatment by sedimentation, coagulation and ultrafiltration, Data in Brief, 15, pp. 916-921. DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.062.
  19. Mahmud, M., Elma, M., Rampun, E.L.A., Rahma, A., Pratiwi, A.E., Abdi, C. & Rossadi, R. (2020). Effect of two stages adsorption as pre-treatment of natural organic matter removal in ultrafiltration process for peat water treatment, Materials Science Forum, 988, pp. 114–121. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.988.114.
  20. Masotti, L. (2011). Depurazione Della Acque—Tecniche ed Impianti per il Trattamento Delle Acque di Rifiuto; Ed. Calderini: Milano, Italy.
  21. Mazuki Mohamad, N.I., Teow, Y.H., Ho, K.C. & Mohammad, A.W. (2020). Techno-economic analysis of single disinfection units and integrated disinfection systems for sewage effluent reclamation, J. Water Proc. Eng. 36, 101398. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101398.
  22. Microbentos. https://microbenotes.com/clostridium-perfringens/ Accessed 20.12.2023.
  23. Peters, C.D., Rantissi, T., Gitis, V. & Hankins, N.P. (2021). Retention of natural organic matter by ultrafiltration and the mitigation of membrane fouling through pre-treatment, membrane enhancement, and cleaning -A review, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 44, 102374. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102374.
  24. Qian, Y., Shi, Y., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Hanigan, D. & Dong, A.(2023) Molecular characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors in filter backwash water from 10 drinking water treatment plants. Science of The Total Environment, 856, 159027. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159027
  25. Radzymińska-Lenarcik, E., Urbaniak, W. & Totczyk, G. (2019). Sludge management after water treatment processes, Water Supply and Water Quality: pp. 995-1004. (in Polish). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331967930_ZAGOSPODAROWANIE_OSADOW_POKOAGULACYJNYCH_POWSTALYCH_W_PROCESIE_UZDA_TNIANIA_WODY. Accessed January 19, 2024.
  26. Reissmann, F. G. & Uhl, W. (2006). Ultrafiltration for the reuse of spent filter backwash water from drinking water treatment, Desalination 198, 1–3, pp. 225-235. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.517
  27. Shafiquzzaman, M., AlSaleem, S.S., Haider, H., Alresheedi, M.T. & Thabit H. (2021). Experimental study for sand filter backwash water management: low-cost treatment for recycling and residual sludge utilization for radium removal, Water, 13, 2799. DOI:10.3390/w13202799.
  28. Sosnowski, T., Suchecka, T. & Piątkiewicz, W. (2004). Penetration of the cell through the microfitration membrane, in Environmental Engineering Committee Monographs. [ed.] Polish Academy of Sciences. Environmental Engineering Committee. 22: pp. 359-367.
  29. Subasi, Y. & Cicek, C. (2017). Recent advances in hydrophilic modification of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes – a review: part I, Membrane Technology 10, pp. 7-12. DOI:10.1016/S0958-2118(17)30191-X.
  30. Sun, Y., Wu, M., Tong, T., Liu, P., Tang, P., Gan, Z., Yang, P., He, H. & Liu B. (2021). Organic compounds in Weiyuan shale gas produced water: identification, detection and rejection by ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis processes, Chemical Engineering Journal, 412, 128699. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2021.128699.
  31. Turan, M. (2023). Backwashing of granular media filters and membranes for water treatment: a review, AQUA-Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 72, 3, pp. 274-298. DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.207.
  32. Wang, D., Zhou, J., Lin, H., Chen, J., Qi, J., Bai, Y. & Qu, J. (2023). Impacts of backwashing on micropollutant removal and associated microbial assembly processes in sand filters, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17, 3, 34. DOI:10.1007/s11783-023-1634-z.
  33. Wolska, M. & Urbańska-Kozłowska, H. (2023). Assessing the Possibilities of Backwash Water Reuse Filters in the Water Treatment System—Case Analysis, Water, 15, 13, 2452. DOI:10.3390/w15132452.
  34. Zhou, Z., Yang, Y., Li, X., Su, Z., Liu, Y., Ren, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2015) Effect of recycling filter backwash water on characteristic variability of dissolved organic matter in coagulation sedimentation process, Desalination and Water Treatment, 53, pp. 48-56, DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.836994.
  35. Zielina, M. & Dąbrowski, W. (2021). Energy and water savings during backwashing of rapid filter plants, Energies, 14, 13, 3782. DOI:10.3390/en14133782.
Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Małgorzata Wolska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Małgorzata Solipiwko-Pieścik
1
ORCID: ORCID
Halina Urbanska-Kozłowska
2
ORCID: ORCID
Zbigniew Ferenc
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
  2. MPWiK S.A we Wrocławiu, Poland

Abstrakt

Extreme cold environments like glaciers, present substantial obstacles to the survival of organisms. Cryoconite, dark sediment covering glacier, provide unique niche for microorganisms. Therefore, we focused on understanding the diversity of fungi in Arctic ecosystems (Hansbreen, Spitsbergen), which is important in the analysis of the structure and of fungi populations. Due to a combination of two incubation temperatures (7°C or 24°C) and two media during isolation (potato dextrose agar, PDA or yeast extract peptone glucose, YPG), and classical/molecular identification approaches, we identified 20 different fungi (17 species and three unassigned species). Most belonged to filamentous fungi within the Ascomycota (19 isolates), with one identified as Basidiomycota-yeast. Regarding growth conditions, both media yielded greater number of fungal cultures at 24°C compared to 7°C. Additionally, PDA was more effective than YPG in isolating fungal cultures. On the other hand, the optimal temperature for achieving the highest CFU (colony–forming unit)/g of sediment was 7°C. The most frequently isolated species was Cladosporium cladosporioides, and to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to detect, the following species in an Arctic environment: Aspergillus jensenii, A. tennesseensis, Peziza varia, and Trichoderma paraviridescens. Additionally, there was a visible increase in the number of fungal propagules but a decrease in their biodiversity towards the upper parts of the glacier. Considering the Arctic amplification there is a need for further research on diversity and function of fungi in glacial ecosystems.
Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Rafał Ogórek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub Suchodolski
1
ORCID: ORCID
Agata Piecuch
1
ORCID: ORCID
Magdalena Cal
1
ORCID: ORCID
Klaudyna Spychała
1
ORCID: ORCID
Bartłomiej Dudek
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Mycology and Genetics, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego Street 63/77,51-148 Wrocław, Poland
  2. Platform for Unique Models Application, Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland

Abstrakt

The marine psychrophilic and endemic Antarctic yeast Leucosporidium antarcticum strain 171 synthesizes intracellular b-fructofuranosidase, and intra- and extracellular a-glucosidases. Each enzyme is maximally produced at 5°C , while the strain’s optimum growth temperature is 15°C . Invertase biosynthesis appeared regulated by catabolic repression, and induced by sucrose; the enzyme was extremely unstable ex vivo, and only EDTA, Mn2+, and BSA stabilized it for up to 12 h after yeast cell lysis. Thermal stability of the invertase was also low (30 min at temperatures up to 12°C). The optimum temperature for invertase activity was 30°C , and optimum pH was 4.55 to 4.75. The extracellular a-glucosidase was maximally active at 35°C and pH 6.70–7.50, and stable for 30 min up to 20°C.

Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Marianna Turkiewicz
Marzena Pazgier
Stuart P. Donachie
Halina Kalinowska

Abstrakt

Microbes living in the polar regions have some common and unique strategies to respond to thermal stress. Nevertheless, the amount of information available, especially at the molecular level is lacking for some organisms such as Antarctic psychrophilic yeast. For instance, it is not known whether molecular chaperones in Antarctic yeasts play similar roles to those from mesophilic yeasts when they are exposed to heat stress. Therefore, this project aimed to determine the gene expression patterns and roles of molecular chaperones in Antarctic psychrophilic Glaciozyma antarctica PI12 that was exposed to heat stress. G. antarctica PI12 was grown at its optimal growth temperature of 12ºC and later exposed to heat stresses at 16ºC and 20ºC for 6 hours. Transcriptomes of those cells were extracted, sequenced and analyzed. Thirty-three molecular chaperone genes demonstrated differential expression of which 23 were up-regulated while 10 were down-regulated. Functions of up-regulated molecular chaperone genes were related to protein binding, response to a stimulus, chaperone binding, cellular response to stress, oxidation, and reduction, ATP binding, DNA-damage response and regulation for cellular protein metabolic process. On the other hand, functions of down-regulated molecular chaperone genes were related to chaperone-mediated protein complex assembly, transcription, cellular macromolecule metabolic process, regulation of cell growth and ribosome biogenesis. The findings provided information on how molecular chaperones work together in a complex network to protect the cells under heat stress. It also highlights the evolutionary conserved protective role of molecular chaperones in psychrophilic yeast, G. antarctica, and mesophilic yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Nur Athirah Yusof
Clemente Michael Vui Ling Wong
ORCID: ORCID
Abdul Munir Abdul Murad
Farah Diba Abu Bakar
Nor Muhammad Mahadi
Ahmad Yamin Abdul Rahman
Nursyafiqi Zainuddin
Mohd Nazalan Mohd Najimudin

Abstrakt

The research covered the determination: of the numbers or hcicrorrophic bacteria: psychrophil ic, psychrctolcrant, mcsophilic and percentage participation or hemolytic bacteria and .ieromonas hydrophila (with acrolysinc and hcmolysine genes) in the waters of the Drwęca River depending on environmental Ilictors and fishery management. The mean quantities 01· hclcrotrophic bacteria (Ht'C) at 4, 14 and 2~°C ranged: O. 78-7.57-101, 1.40-6.65-101 and 1.93-16.23- 103 efuen -3, respectively. The percentage participation 01· hemolytic heterotrophic bacteria (HemPC) and A. hvdrophila among psychrophilic, psychrotolcrant, mcsophilic microorganisms determined at 4, 14, 28°C, ranged: 7.9-10.4, 6.8-12.2, 8.6-22.0 ,111d 1.1-6.4%, respectively. Statistically significant correlation between examined bacteria and temperature values, flows and O2 saturations confirm that the occurrence of those microorganisms depends on the degree of microbiological contamination of that ecosystem, resulting from the fishery management and environmental factors.
Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Iwona Gołaś
Karol Korzekwa
Monika Harnisz
Izabella Zmysłowska
Mariusz Todorowicz
Elżbieta Terech-Majewska
Wiesława Rodziewicz
Mariola Bieńkowska

Ta strona wykorzystuje pliki 'cookies'. Więcej informacji