Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The authors analyze the new book The place of the Macedonian phonetics within the Slavic and Balkan linguistic area from Irena Sawicka and Anna Cychnerska. The book is trying to shed new light on the place of Macedonian phonetics regarding its Slavic heritage and also regarding the contact changes that appeared during development of the Macedonian language in the Balkan linguistic league. Their research is conducted on Macedonian dialects represented in Common linguistic atlas (OLA) and in Phonological bases of the Macedonian dialects from B. Vidoeski. In their book, Sawicka and Cychnerska state that they use diachronic data, but their main goal is to present selected synchronic features from the Macedonian phonetics. They explain most of the phonetic features in Macedonian from an areal-typological aspect with special emphasis on the Balkan convergences. The authors of the book state that the Macedonian phonetic should be included in southwest type of Slavic phonetics. They conclude that the modern form of Macedonian phonetic, to large extent, was influenced by areal position of the Macedonian language and to its development in the Balkan multilingual territory.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Марјан Марковиќ
Веселинка Лаброска
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The origin of Proto-Slavic palatal(ized) consonants has interested many linguists. Some of them have tried to connect palatality and velarity of Slavic consonants with the influence of Turkic consonant palatalization or velarization dependent on vowel harmony. This paper is a first study allowing for Turkological point of view and striving to show that there still are many doubts about the Proto- -Turkic influence on Proto-Slavic.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Stachowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Slavic Studies, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The text is an overview of the first volume of the lexical atlas of the Russian folk dialects. It presents modern cartographic methods used in the volume and types of maps contained therein. In order to better present the volume, one exemplary map is analysed, indicating its advantages and drawbacks. In conclusion the richness of the Russian dialectal lexical material, which was precisely geographically located, is stressed. This is the biggest merit of the atlas.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jadwiga Waniakowa
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Slavic‑Turkish linguistic relations are generally only discussed unilaterally, focusing on the Turkish influence on Slavic and neglecting the opposite direction. Thus far, no more than two relatively extensive essays (the larger one counting 44 pages) have been devoted to Slavic loanwords in Turkish. The present paper aims to outline the state of research on this topic. It begins with a comparison of the two essays, then it examines several of somewhat atypical words, as well as a handful of suffixes, and it closes with a very brief presentation of the Slavic influence on case government of Gagauz verbs.
Go to article

Bibliography

Dybo A. V., 2000, Turkic Languages and Slavic, „Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online”, ed. Marc L. Greenberg, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2589-6229_ESLO_COM_032504, (dostęp 10.08.2020).
Foy K., 1898, Der Purismus bei den Osmanen, „Mittheilungen des Seminars für orientalische Sprachen an der königlichen Friedrich Wilhelms‑Universität zu Berlin. 2. Abt.”, vol. 1, S. 20–55.
Gülsevin G., 2009, Rumeli Türkçesi çerçevesinde Türk ve Balkan dillerinin etkileşimi, „Turkish Studies”, vol. 4, s. 48–64.
Gülsevin G., 2017, XVII. yüzyıl Batı Rumeli Türkçesi ağızları, Ankara.
Hazai G., 1961, Remarques sur les rapports des langues slaves des Balkans avec le turc‑osmanli, „Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae”, vol. 7, pp. 97–138.
KEWT = Stachowski M., 2019a.
Kowalski T., 1933, Les Turcs et la langue turque de la Bulgarie du Nord‑Est, Kraków.
Meninski F. à Mesgnien, 1680, Thesaurus Linguarum Orientalium, Viennae.
Miklosich F., 1889, Die slavischen, magyarischen und rumunischen Elemente im türkischen Sprachschatze, Wien.
Rocchi L., 2014, I repertori lessicali turco‑ottomani di Giovan Battista Montalbano (1630 ca.), Trieste.
Rusek J., 1997, O nazwach kapusty (Brassica oleracea) w językach słowiańskich, „Rocznik Slawistyczny”, t. 50, s. 53–61.
Sawicka I., (w druku), Rozważania o tureckich sufiksach w języku macedońskim.
Stachowski K., 2008, Names of cereals in the Turkic languages, Kraków.
Stachowski K., 2009, The discussion on consonant harmony in Northwestern Karaim, „Türkbilig”, vol. 18, pp. 158–193.
Stachowski M., 2016, Case shifts and case syncretism in Gagauz in the context of Bulgarian patterns, „Türk Dilleri Araştırmaları”, vol. 26/2, pp. 265–275.
Stachowski M., 2019a, Kurzgefaßtes etymologisches Wörterbuch der türkischen Sprache, Kraków.
Stachowski M., 2019b, Slavic languages in contact, 2: Are there Ottoman Turkish loanwords in the Balkan Slavic languages?, „Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis”, vol. 136, pp. 99–105.
Tietze A., 1957, Slavische Lehnwörter in der türkischen Volkssprache, „Oriens”, vol. 10, S. 1–47.
Tietze A., 1999, Wörterbuch der griechischen, slavischen, arabischen und persischen Lehnwörter im Anatolischen Türkisch, İstanbul.
Yüksel Z., 1989, Polatlı Kırım Türkçesi ağzı, Ankara.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Stachowski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more