Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the preliminary study of n-butanol removal in the adsorption process. The main objective of the research was to asess whether and to what extent biochars produced from selected organic waste materials are suitable for odor removal. Biochars produced from dried sewage sludge and beekeeping waste were tested in the adsorption process. At first, raw materials were pyrolyzed and then modified with a 25% ZnCl2 solution or a 30% H2O2 solution. The adsorption process was conducted using a model gas – the European reference odorant – n-butanol. The output parameter was odor concentration Cod [ouE/m3]. Odor concentration Cod values were obtained using a dynamic olfactometry method on T08 olfactometer. The solid byproducts of pyrolysis of digested sewage sludge and beekeeping waste may be used as adsorbents for the removal of n-butanol in the adsorption process. Adsorption performance of biochar from sewage sludge is better than biochar from beekeeping waste. Additional modification with H2O2 or ZnCl2 increases the efficiency of the process, thus decreasing the required bed height for the elimination of odorant. The results of the studies confirm the findings of other authors that biochars derived from sewage sludge and other organic waste materials may be efficient sorbents in the removal of various substances from water or the air. Other biochars and methods of their activation should be tested. For practical reasons, the next stage of the research should be the determination of the adsorption front height and its migration rate.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Ahmad, M., Lee, S.S., Dou, X., Mohan, D., Sung, J-K., Yang, J.E. & Ok, Y.S. (2012). Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresource Technology, 118, 536–544. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.042
  2. Angın, D. (2013). Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. Bioresource Technology, 128, 593–597. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.150
  3. Bogusz, A., Oleszczuk, P.& Dobrowolski, R. (2015). Application of laboratory prepared and commercially available biochars to adsorption of cadmium, copper and zinc ions from water. Bioresource Technology, 196, 540–549. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.006
  4. Chen, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Lu, W., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Y. & Ren, L. (2014). Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and heavy metal adsorptive performance of biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge. Bioresource Technology, 164, 47–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.048
  5. Chen, X., Jeyaseelan, S. & Graham, N. (2002). Physical and chemical properties study of the activated carbon made from sewage sludge. Waste Management, 22(7), pp. 755–760. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00057-0
  6. Curyło, J. & Rybak, H. (1972). Characteristics of the domestic wax melted from beeswax and the wax extracted from slumgum with trichlorethylene (TRI). Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, XVI, pp. 153–162. (in Polish)
  7. De la Guardia, M. & Morales-Rubio, A. (1996). Modern strategies for the rapid determination of metals in sewage sludge. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 15(8), pp. 311–318. DOI: 10.1016/0165-9936(96)00041-6
  8. Graham, N., Chen, X.G. & Jayaseelan, S. (2001). The potential application of activated carbon from sewage sludge to organic dyes removal. Water Sci Technol, 43(2), pp. 245–252. PMID: 11380186
  9. Guo, C., Zou, J., Yang, J., Wang, K. & Song, S. (2020). Surface characterization of maize-straw-derived biochar and their sorption mechanism for Pb2+ and methylene blue. PLOS ONE, 15(8): e0238105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238105
  10. Hvitved-Jacobsen, T., Vollertsen, J., Yongsiri, C., Nielsen, A. & Abdul-Talib, S. (2002). Sewer microbial processes, emissions and impacts. Sewer Processes.
  11. Hwang, Y., Matsuo, T., Hanaki, K. & Suzuki, N. (1995). Identification and quantification of sulfur and nitrogen containing odorous compounds in wastewater. Water Research, 29(2), pp. 711–718. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00145-W
  12. Ignatowicz, K. (2008) Sorption process for migration reduction of pesticides from graveyards‎. Archives of Environmental Protection. 34(3)., pp. 143-149.
  13. Ignatowicz, K., Piekarski, J., Skoczko, I. & Piekutin, J. (2016). Analysis of simplified equations of adsorption dynamics of HCH. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57 (3), pp. 1420–1428. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.996011
  14. Kim, W-K., Shim, T., Kim, Y-S., Hyun, S., Ryu, C., Park, Y-K. & Jung, J. (2013). Characterization of cadmium removal from aqueous solution by biochar produced from a giant Miscanthus at different pyrolytic temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 138, 266–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.186
  15. Lach, J. & Ociepa, E. (2003). Effect of high-temperature modification of activated carbon on the sorption of Cr(VI) anions and Cr(III) cations from aqueous solutions. Ochrona Środowiska, 3 (25), pp. 57–60. (in Polish)
  16. Latosińska, J. (2014). The analysis of heavy metals mobility from sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plants in Olsztyn and Sitkówka-Nowiny. Inżynieria i Ochrona Środowiska, 17(2), pp. 243–253. (in Polish)
  17. Lee, Y., Park, J., Ryu, C., Gang, K.S., Yang, W., Park, Y-K., Jung, J. & Hyun, S. (2013). Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500°C. Bioresource Technology, 148, 196–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.135
  18. Lu, H., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Zhuang, L., Yang, Y. & Qiu, R. (2013). Characterization of sewage sludge-derived biochars from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 102, 137–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.03.004
  19. Milik, J., Pasela, R., Szymczak, M. & Chalamoński, M. (2016). Evaluation of the Physico-chemical Composition of Sludge from Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 18, pp. 579–590. (in Polish)
  20. Norouzi, H., Jafari, D. & Esfandyari, M. (2020). Study on a new adsorbent for biosorption of cadmium ion from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from Ricinus communis. Desal. Water Treat., 191, pp. 140–152. DOI:10.5004/dwt.2020.25702
  21. Piecuch, T., Kowalczyk, A., Dąbrowski, T., Dąbrowski, J. & Andriyevska, L. (2015). Reduction of Odorous Noxiousness of Sewage Treatment Plant in Tychowo. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 17, pp. 646–663. (in Polish)
  22. Piekarski, J. (2009). Numerical modeling of the filtration and sorption process. Monografia, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Koszalińskiej. (in Polish)
  23. Piekarski, J., Dąbrowski, T. & Ignatowicz, K. (2021). Effect of bed height on efficiency of adsorption of odors from sewage sludge using modified biochars from organic waste materials as an adsorbent. Desal. Water Treat., 218, 252–259. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.26975
  24. PN-EN 13725:2007 "Air quality. Determination of odor concentration by dynamic olfactometry". (in Polish)
  25. Puchlik, M., Ignatowicz, K. & Dabrowski, W. (2015). Influence of bio- preparation on wastewater purification process in constructed wetlands. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 16 (1), pp. 159–163. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/602
  26. Rauf, A., Mahmud, T. & Ashraf, M. (2020). Sorption studies on removal of Cd2+ from the aqueous solution using fruit-peels of Litchi chinensis Sonn. Desal. Water Treat., 187, pp. 277–286. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25414
  27. Semkiw, P., Skubida, P., Jeziorski, K. & Pioś, A. (2018). The beekeeping sector in Poland. Instytut Ogrodnictwa, Zakład Pszczelarstwa w Puławach. (in Polish)
  28. Shaaban, A.,Se, S-M., Dimin, M.F., Juoi, J.M., Husin, M.H.M. & Mitan, N.M.M. (2014). Influence of heating temperature and holding time on biochars derived from rubber wood sawdust via slow pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 107, 31–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.01.021
  29. Sówka, I. (2011). Methods of identification of odour gases emitted from industrial plants. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej. (in Polish)
  30. Sówka, I., Miller, U., Skrętowicz, M., Nych, A. & Zwoździak, J. (2013). The Conditions and Requirements Necessary for the Proper Functioning of the Olfactometric Laboratory. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 15, pp. 1207–1215. (in Polish)
  31. Szostek, M., Kaniuczak, J., Hajduk, E., Stanek-Tarkowska, J., Jasiński, T., Niemiec, W. & Smusz, R. (2018). Effect of sewage sludge on the yield and energy value of the aboveground biomass of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(3), pp. 42–50. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2018.122285
  32. Tang, Y., Samrat, Alam, Md., Konhauser, K.O., Alessi, D.S., Xu, S., Tian, W. & Liu, Y. (2019). Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production of digested sludge biochar and its application for ammonium removal from municipal wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, pp. 927–936. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.268
  33. Titova, J. & Baltrėnaitė, E. (2020). Physical and Chemical Properties of Biochar Produced from Sewage Sludge Compost and Plants Biomass, Fertilized with that Compost, Important for Soil Improvement. Waste Biomass Valor. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-020-01272-2
  34. Wen, Q., Li, C., Cai, Z., Zhang, W., Gao, H., Chen, L., Zeng, G., Shu, X. & Zhao, Y. (2011). Study on activated carbon derived from sewage sludge for adsorption of gaseous formaldehyde. Bioresource Technology, 102(2), pp. 942–947. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.042
  35. Wiśniewska, M., Kulig, A. & Lelicińska-Serafin, K. (2020). Olfactometric testing as a method for assessing odour nuisance of biogas plants processing municipal waste, Archives of Environmental Protection, 46(3), pp. 60–68. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2020.134536
  36. Włodarczyk, E., Próba, M. & Wolny, L. (2014). Comparison of Test Results for Stabilized Sewage Sludge Derived from Storage Yard and Drying Hall. Inżynieria i Ochrona Środowiska, 17( 3), pp. 473–481. (in Polish)
  37. Zhang, F-S., Nriagu, J.O. & Itoh, H. (2005). Mercury removal from water using activated carbons derived from organic sewage sludge. Water Research, 39(2–3), pp. 389–395. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.027
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jacek Piekarski
1
Tomasz Dąbrowski
1
Janusz Dąbrowski
1
Katarzyna Ignatowicz
2

  1. Koszalin University of Technology
  2. Bialystok University of Technology
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Plastics are one of the most widely used materials, and, in most cases, they are designed to have long life spans. Since plastic and packaging waste pollute the environment for many years, their disposal is of great importance for the environment and human health. In this paper, a system was developed to store liquid fuel from plastic and organic waste mixes without solidification, which then can be used as fuel in motor vehicles and construction machinery. For this purpose, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and organic wastes and clay, zeolite, and MCS23-code materials (50% magnetite- %25 calcium oxide- %25 sodium chloride) were heated in a closed medium at temperatures ranging from 300 to400 oC and subsequently re-condensed. The study conducted twenty tests, involving various types and rates of plastic and organic materials, as well as different rates of catalysts. Among these tests, the highest liquid fuel yield (67.47%) was achieved in Test 9, where 50% PVC-50% PET waste, 75 g of clinoptilolite, and 500 g of MCS23 waste were collectively used. Notably, Test 12 exhibited the highest density value (79.8 kg/m3), while the best viscosity value (2.794 mm2/s) was observed in Test 2. Across all samples, flash point values were found to be below 40oC. The most favorable yield point value was recorded in Test 2 (-6oC). The samples displayed ash content within the range of 0 to0.01% (m/m)] and combustion heat values of 35.000> J/g which fall within the standard range. The incorporation of MCS23 with clinoptilolite additives is believed to have a significant impact on obtaining high-yield products with improved fuel properties.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Allende S., Brodie G. & Jacob M.V. (2022) Energy recovery from sugarcane bagasse under varying microwave-assisted pyrolysis conditions, Bioresource Technology Reports, 20, 101283, ISSN 2589-014X, DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101283
  2. Damodharan D., Kumar B.R., Gopal K., De Poures M.V. & Sethuramasamyraja B., (2019). Utilization of waste plastic oil in diesel engines: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology. 18, pp. 681-697. DOI: 10.1007/s11157-019-09516-x
  3. DIN, DIN 51900-2, 2003. Petroleum products – Petroleum products – Determination of Heat of Combustion – Bomb Calorimetry Method, Berlin. DOI: 10.31030/9447973
  4. Dorado C., Mullen C.A. & Boateng A.A., (2014). Origin of carbon in aromatic and olefin products derived from HZSM-5catalyzed co-pyrolysis of cellulose and plastics via isotopic labeling. Applied CatalysisB: Environmental. 162, pp. 338-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.006
  5. Erşen T, & Pehlivan D, 2011. High density polyethylene – Co-pyrolysis of wood blends. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 26, pp. 607-612.
  6. Kalargaris I., Tian G. & Gu S., (2017). The utilisation of oils produced from plastic waste at different pyrolysis temperatures in a DI diesel engine. Energy. 131, pp. 179-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.024
  7. Kaminsky W. & Kim J.S., (1999). Pyrolysis of mixed plastics into aromatics. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 51, pp. 127-134. DOI: 10.1016/S01652370(99)00012-1
  8. Kaminsky W., Predel M. & Sadiki A., (2004). Feedstock recycling of polymers by pyrolysis in a fluidised bed. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 85, pp. 1045-1050, 146. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.05.002
  9. Kirov N.Y. & Peck M.A. (1970). Characteristics of chars from fluid-bed coal carbonization, Fuel, 49( 4), pp. 375-394. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-2361(70)80003-5.
  10. Krishnamurthy S., Shah Y.T. & Stiegalt G.J. (1980). Pyrolysis of coal liquids, Fuel, 59(11), pp. 738-746. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(80)90247-1
  11. Lee D-J., (2022). Gasification of municipal solid waste (MSW) as a cleaner final disposal route: A mini-review. Bioresource Technology. 344, 126217. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126217
  12. Liu B., Han Z., Li J. & Yan B. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of municipal solid waste power generation and carbon emission potential in Tianjin based on Grey Relation Analysis and Long Short Term Memory. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 168, pp. 918-927. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.10.065
  13. Liu Q., Sheng Y. & Wang Z. (2023). Co-pyrolysis with pine sawdust reduces the environmental risks of copper and zinc in dredged sediment and improves its adsorption capacity for cadmium. Journal of Environmental Management, 334, 117502, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117502
  14. Mazumdar B.K. & Chatterjee N.N. (1973). Mechanism of coal pyrolysis in relation to industrial practice. Fuel, 52(1), pp. 11-19. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(73)90005-7
  15. Ma J., Feng S., Zhang Z., Wang Z., Kong W., Yuan P., Shen B. & Mu L. (2022). Pyrolysis characteristics of biodried products derived from municipal organic wastes: Synergistic effect of bulking agents and modification of biodegradation, Environmental Research. 206, 112300., DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112300
  16. Miranda R., Pakdel H., Roy C. & Vasile C., (2001). Vacuum pyrolysis of commingled plastics containing PVC II. Product analysis. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 73, pp.47-67. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00066-0
  17. Öngen A., Karabag N., Yiğit H.S., Özcan H.K., Elmaslar Ö.E. & Aydın S., (2019). An Assessment of Pyrolysis Process for the Treatment of Agricultural and Forest Wastes. Recyclıng And Reuse Approaches For Better Sustaınabılıty. pp. 97110. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95888-0_9
  18. Öngen A., Özcan H.K. & Elmaslar Ozbas E. (2016). Gasification of biomass and treatment sludge in a fixed bed gasifier. Internatıonal Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol.41(19), 8146-8153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.159
  19. Öngen A., Özcan H.K., Elmaslar Özbaş, E. & Pangaliyev Y. (2019). Gasification of waste tires in a circulating fixed-bed reactor within the scope of waste to energy. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,.21,pp. 1281-1291. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-019-01705-0
  20. Özcan H.K., Öngen A. & Pangaliyev Y., (2016). An Experimental Study of Recoverable Products from Waste Tire Pyrolysis. Global Nest Journal. 3, pp. 582-590. DOI: 10.30955/gnj.001907
  21. Pan R. & Debenest G., (2022). Numerical investigation of a novel smoldering-driven reactor for plastic waste pyrolysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 257, 115439.DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115439.
  22. Pan R., Martins M.F. & Debenest G., (2022). Optimization of oil production through ex-situ catalytic pyrolysis of waste polyethylene with activated carbon. Energy, 248, 123514. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123514
  23. Pan R., Lougou B. G., Shuai Y. & Debenest G. (2023). A multidimensional numeric study on smoldering-driven pyrolysis of waste polypropylene. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 172, pp. 305-316. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.018
  24. Papari S., Bamdad H. & Berruti F. (2021). Pyrolytic conversion of plastic waste to value-added products and fuels: A Review. Materials. 14(10), 2586. DOI: 10.3390/ma14102586
  25. Pinto F., Costa P., Gülyurtlu I. & Cabrita I. (1999). Pyrolysis of plastic wastes. 1. Effect of plastic waste composition on product yield. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 51, pp. 39-55. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2370(99)00007-8
  26. Saliba M., Frantzi S. & Beukering P. (2022). Shipping spills and plastic pollution: A review of maritime governance in the North Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 181, 113939, DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113939
  27. Schafer H.N.S. (1979). Pyrolysis of brown coals. 2. Decomposition of acidic groups on heating in the range 100–900 °C. Fuel, 58(9), pp. 673-679. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(79)90222-9
  28. Sharma B.K., Moser B.R., Vermillion K.E., Doll K.M. & Rajagopalan N. (2014). Production, characterization and fuel properties of alternative diesel fuel from pyrolysis of waste plastic grocery bags. Fuel Processing Technology. 122, pp. 79-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.01.019
  29. Sogancioglu M., Ahmetli G. & Yel E. (2017). A Comparative Study on Waste Plastic Pyrolysis Liquid Products Quantity and Energy Recovery Potential. Energy Procedia, 118, pp.221-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.020
  30. TS, TS 1233 ISO 3016, (1997). Petroleum products-Determination of pour point, Ankara. https://intweb.tse.org.tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?081118051115108051104119110104055047105102120088111043113104073081055057051113111083082048090121
  31. TS, TS 1451 EN ISO 3104, (1999). Petroleum products-Transparent and opaque liquids-Kinematic viscosity determination and calculation of dynamic viscosity, Ankara. https://intweb.tse.org.tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?081118051115108051104119110104055047105102120088111043113104073083077102090084083076053089099056
  32. TS, TS 6147 EN ISO 12937, (2002). Petroleum products- Water determination- Calometric Karl fischer titration method, Ankara. https://intweb.tse.org.tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?081118051115108051104119110104055047105102120088111043113104073081107087097053098049101074085051
  33. TS, TS EN ISO 12185, (2007). Crude oil and petroleum products- Density determination - oscillating u-Tube method, Ankara. https://intweb.tse.org.tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?081118051115108051104119110104055047105102120088111043113104073087088047079051101109088047113066
  34. TS, TS EN ISO 2719, (2016). Petroleum products and lubricants - Determination of flash point - Pensky Martens closed cup method, Ankara. https://intweb.tse.org.tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?081118051115108051104119110104055047105102120088111043113104073082090086090075081118122084111048
  35. TS, TS EN ISO 6245, (2006). Petroleum products – Ash determination, Ankara. https://intweb.tse.org.tr/Standard/Standard/Standard.aspx?081118051115108051104119110104055047105102120088111043113104073084090047056119107056057109067090)
  36. Williams P.T. & Williams E.A. (1999). Interaction of Plastics in Mixed-Plastics Pyrolysis. Energy & Fuels.13, pp. 188-196. DOI:10.1021/ef980163x
  37. Williams P.T. & Slaney E. (2007). Analysis of products from the pyrolysis and liquefaction of single plastics and waste plastic mixtures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 51, pp. 754-769. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.12.002
  38. Varank G., Öngen A., Guvenc S. Y., Ozcan H. K., Ozbas E. & Guven E.C. (2022). Modeling and optimization of syngas production from biomass gasification. International Journal of Envıronmental Science and Technology, 19(4), pp. 3345-3358. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03374-3
  39. Vinti G., Bauza V., Clasen T., Tudor T., Zurbrügg C. & Vaccari M. (2023). Health risks of solid waste management practices in rural Ghana: A semi-quantitative approach toward a solid waste safety plan. Environmental Research, 216(3), 114728. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114728
  40. Zhang C., Hu M., Maio F., Sprecher B., Yang X. & Tukker A. (2022). An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe. Science of The Total Environment, 803, 149892. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892 .
  41. Zhang J., Jin J., Wang M., Naidu R., Liu Y., Man Y.B., Liang X., Wong M.H., Christie P., Zhang Y., Song C. & Shan S. (2020). Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice husk/ bamboo sawdust for biochar with high aromaticity and low metal mobility. Environmental Research, 191, 110034. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110034
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mehmet Can Sarıkap
1
Fatma Hoş Çebi
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Turkey
  2. Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The potential of organic wastes in Ukraine for biogas production and the prospects of using the family-type biogas plants for this purpose are shown. In the biogas laboratory of the Ukrainian National Forestry University the efficiency of the anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure of Poltava poultry farm, Kamianets-Podilsky poultry farm and sewage sludge from Lviv wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was investigated. Different integral indicators of the biogas production and significantly different dynamics of its formation over time were obtained for three investigated substrates. The value of average specific biogas production from the sewage sludge of Lviv WWTP is 0.494 dm3∙(day∙kg FM)–1, which is 5.1 times more comparing the chicken manure of Kamianets-Podilsky poultry farm and 8.0 times more than for the chicken manure of Poltava poultry farm. Strong negative effect of antibiotic treatment of chickens on methane contentin the obtained biogas was established experimentally.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ivan Voytovych
Myroslav Malovanyy
ORCID: ORCID
Volodymyr Zhuk
Orest Mukha
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The amount of solid organic waste is constantly growing. This is caused by the growth of industrial and agricultural capacities, and the inefficiency of existing waste processing technologies. Biotechnologies can provide effective environmentally friendly solutions for waste treatment. Therefore, the goal of our work was to compare the efficiency of strictly anaerobic fermentation of multi-component solid organic waste with hydrogen synthesis and waste treatment with pulsed air access in batch bioreactors.During fermentation, the following parameters were controlled: pH, redox potential (Eh), concentration of dissolved organics, and the content of H2, O2, and CO2 in the gas phase. The efficiency was evaluated via the process duration, calculation of the ratio of the initial and final weight of waste (Кd), and the yield of molecular hydrogen. Obtained results revealed high efficiency of organic waste degradation in both variants. The weight of waste 83-fold and 86-fold decreased, respectively. The time required for fermentation in strictly anaerobic conditions was 4 days, whereas 7 days were required for the mode with pulsed air access. The first variant provided a 2.8-fold higher hydrogen yield (54±4,1 L/kg of waste), and the second one provided a decrease in the concentration of dissolved organic compounds in the fermentation fluid. Fermentation is the effective approach for accelerated degradation of solid organic waste. Strictly anaerobic fermentation appeared to be useful in the need to accelerate the process. The mode with the pulsed air access can provide not only degradation of solid waste but also purification of the fermentation fluid.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Akhlaghi, N. & Najafpour-Darzi, Gh. (2020). A Comprehensive Review on Biological Hydrogen Production, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(43), pp. 22492–22512. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.182.
  2. Alwaeli, M., Alshawaf, M. & Klasik, M., (2022). Recycling of Selected Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste as Artificial Soil Substrate in Support of the Circular Economy, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48(4), pp. 68–77. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.143710.
  3. Bakkaloglu, S., Lowry, D., Fisher, R.E., France, J.L., Brunner, D., Chen, H. & Nisbet, E.G. (2021). Quantification of Methane Emissions from UK Biogas Plants, Waste Management, 124, pp. 82–93. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.011.
  4. Berezkin, V.G. (1983). Chemical Methods in Gas Chromatography. Elsevier, The Netherlands 1983.
  5. Bernstad, A.K., Cánovas, A. & Valle, R. (2017). Consideration of Food Wastage along the Supply Chain in Lifecycle Assessments: A Mini-Review Based on the Case of Tomatoes, Waste Management & Research, 35(1), pp. 29–39. DOI:10.1177/0734242X16666945.
  6. Chaijak, P. & Sola, P. (2023). ‘The New Report of Domestic Wastewater Treatment and Bioelectricity Generation Using Dieffenbachia Seguine Constructed Wetland Coupling Microbial Fuel Cell (CW-MFC)’. Archives of Environmental Protection; 2023; 49(1), pp. 57-62. DOI:10.24425/aep.2023.144737.
  7. Chen, T., Zhang, Sh. & Yuan, Z. (2020). Adoption of Solid Organic Waste Composting Products: A Critical Review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122712. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122712.
  8. El Bari, H., Lahboubi, N., Habchi, S., Rachidi, S., Bayssi O., Nabil N., Mortezaei Y. & Villa, R. (2022). Biohydrogen Production from Fermentation of Organic Waste, Storage and Applications, Cleaner Waste Systems, 3, 100043. DOI:10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100043.
  9. Erdiwansyah, E., Gani, A., Mamat, R., Mahidin, M., Sudhakar, K., Rosdi, S.M. & Husin H. (2022). Biomass and Wind Energy as Sources of Renewable Energy for a More Sustainable Environment in Indonesia: A Review, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48(3), pp. 57–69. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.142690.
  10. Erses, A.S., Onay, T.T. & Yenigun, O. (2008). Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic degradation of municipal solid waste in bioreactor landfills, Bioresource technology, 99(13), pp. 5418–5426. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.008.
  11. Gill, S.S., Jana, A.M. & Shrivastav, A. (2014). Aerobic bacterial degradation of kitchen waste: A review, Journal of microbiology, biotechnology and food sciences, 3(6), pp. 477–483. https://office2.jmbfs.org/index.php/JMBFS/article/view/7661.
  12. Havryliuk, O., Hovorukha, V., Bida, I., Gladka G., Tymoshenko, A., Kyrylov, S., Mariychuk, R. & Tashyrev O. (2023). Anaerobic Degradation of the Invasive Weed Solidago canadensis L. (Goldenrod) and Copper Immobilization by a Community of Sulfate-Reducing and Methane-Producing Bacteria, Plants, 12(1), pp. 198–213. DOI:10.3390/plants12010198.
  13. Hovorukha, V., Tashyrev, O., Matvieieva, N., Tashyreva, H., Havryliuk, O., Bielikova O. & Sioma, I. (2019). Integrated Approach for Development of Environmental Biotechnologies for Treatment of Solid Organic Waste and Obtaining of Biohydrogen and Lignocellulosic Substrate, Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 74(4), pp. 31–42. |DOI:10.5755/j01.erem.74.4.20723.
  14. Hovorukha, V., Tashyrev, O., Havryliuk, O. & Iastremska, L. (2020). High Efficiency of Food Waste Fermentation and Biohydrogen Production in Experimental-Industrial Anaerobic Batch Reactor, The Open Agriculture Journal, 14(1), pp. 174–186. DOI:10.2174/1874331502014010174.
  15. Katinas, V., Marčiukaitis, M., Perednis, E. & Dzenajavičienė, E.F. (2019). Analysis of Biodegradable Waste Use for Energy Generation in Lithuania, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, pp. 559–567. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.022.
  16. Khan, M.A., Ngo H.H., Guo, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Guo, J., Chang, S.W., Nguyen, D.D. & Wang, J. (2018). Biohydrogen Production from Anaerobic Digestion and Its Potential as Renewable Energy, Renewable Energy, 1st International Conference on Bioresource Technology for Bioenergy, Bioproducts & Environmental Sustainability, 129, pp. 754–768. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.029.
  17. Lim, J.X., Zhou, Y. & Vadivelu, V.M. (2020). Enhanced Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Microbial Population Analysis in Anaerobic Treatment of High Strength Wastewater, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 33, 101058. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101058.
  18. Marone, A., Izzo, G., Mentuccia, L., Massini, G., Paganin, P., Rosa, S., Varrone, C. & Signorini, A. (2014). Vegetable Waste as Substrate and Source of Suitable Microflora for Bio-Hydrogen Production, Renewable Energy, 68, pp. 6–13. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.013.
  19. Mata-Alvarez, J., Macé, S. & Llabrés P. (2000). Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Solid Wastes. An Overview of Research Achievements and Perspectives, Bioresource Technology, 74(1), pp. 3–16. DOI:10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7.
  20. Meegoda, J.N., Li, B., Patel, K. & Wang, L.B. (2018). A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2224. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15102224.
  21. Parthiba Karthikeyan, O., Trably, E., Mehariya, S., Bernet, N., Wong, J.W.C. & Carrere, H. (2018). Pretreatment of Food Waste for Methane and Hydrogen Recovery: A Review, Bioresource Technology, 249, pp. 1025–1039. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.105.
  22. Pawnuk, M., Szulczyński, B., den Boer, E. & Sówka I. (2022). Preliminary Analysis of the State of Municipal Waste Management Technology in Poland along with the Identification of Waste Treatment Processes in Terms of Odor Emissions, Archives of Environmental Protection, 48(3), pp. 3–20. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.142685.
  23. Rubežius, M., Venslauskas, K., Navickas, K. & Bleizgys R. (2020). Influence of Aerobic Pretreatment of Poultry Manure on the Biogas Production Process, Processes, 8(9), 1109. DOI:10.3390/pr8091109.
  24. Scarlat, N., Dallemand J.-F. & Fahl F. (2018). Biogas: Developments and Perspectives in Europe, Renewable Energy, 129, pp. 457–472. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006.
  25. Shimizu, S., Fujisawa, A., Mizuno, O., Kameda, T. & Yoshioka, T. (2008). Fermentative Hydrogen Production From Food Waste Without Inocula, AIP Conference Proceedings, 987(1), pp. 171–174. DOI:10.1063/1.2896968.
  26. Suslova, O., Govorukha, V., Brovarskaya, O., Matveeva, N., Tashyreva, H. & Tashyrev O. (2014). Method for Determining Organic Compound Concentration in Biological Systems by Permanganate Redox Titration, International Journal Bioautomation, 18(1), pp. 45–52. https://biomed.bas.bg/bioautomation/2014/vol_18.1/files/18.1_05.pdf
  27. Tashyrev, O., Hovorukha, V., Havryliuk, O., Sioma, I., Gladka, G., Kalinichenko, O., Włodarczyk, P., Suszanowicz, D., Zhuk, H. & Ivanov, Y. (2022). Spatial Succession for Degradation of Solid Multicomponent Food Waste and Purification of Toxic Leachate with the Obtaining of Biohydrogen and Biomethane, Energies, 15(3), 911. DOI:10.3390/en15030911.
  28. Wang, X. & Zhao Y.-C. (2009). A Bench Scale Study of Fermentative Hydrogen and Methane Production from Food Waste in Integrated Two-Stage Process, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(1), pp. 245–254. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.100.
  29. Wu, X., Zhu, J., Dong, C., Miller, C., Li Y., Wang, L. & Yao, W. (2009). Continuous Biohydrogen Production from Liquid Swine Manure Supplemented with Glucose Using an Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 4th Dubrovnik Conference, 34(16), pp. 6636–6645. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.058.
  30. Xiao, M. & Wu, F. (2014). A Review of Environmental Characteristics and Effects of Low-Molecular Weight Organic Acids in the Surface Ecosystem, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 26(5), pp. 935–954. DOI:10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60570-7.
  31. Xue, S., Song, J., Wang, X., Shang, Z., Sheng, C., Li, C., Zhu, Y. & Liu, J. (2020). A Systematic Comparison of Biogas Development and Related Policies between China and Europe and Corresponding Insights, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, 109474. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109474.
  32. Zhang, J., Kan, X., Shen, Y., Loh, K.-C., Wang, C.-H., Dai, Y. & Tong, Y.W. (2018). A Hybrid Biological and Thermal Waste-to-Energy System with Heat Energy Recovery and Utilization for Solid Organic Waste Treatment, Energy, 152, pp. 214–222. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.143.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Vira Hovorukha
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Environmental Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Opole, Poland
  2. Department of Extremophilic Microorganisms Biology, D.K. Zabolotny Institute of Microbiologyand Virology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more