Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Having established students` life values, the role of religion in its structure, it is possible to predict the future development of society. The purpose of this study is to analyse the religious value orientations influence on student society and to determine the influence nature of religious orientations in the system of value orientations on the daily behaviour of students. This study is based on the research of students' religious orientations in the Tyumen region conducted in 2021. The study was conducted in the context of a basic long-term research of the student's value priorities in the Tyumen region. The methodological basis of the research is the key provisions of social philosophy, sociology and psychology of religion, sociology of personality, sociology of youth and social psychology. Based on the results of an empirical study, the authors characterised the religiosity of the modern youth and determined the impact nature of religious orientations on everyday behaviour. The practical significance of the study is that the empirical data obtained can be used by civil society to prevent the spread of radical religious ideas among students, to involve the data in the activities of organisations dealing with extremism. The results obtained in the course of the study allow developing interaction projects between universities, student associations, and religious associations in the implementation of numerous state youth policy areas, which sets the "possible impact" boundaries of religious associations on cooperation with students.
Go to article

Bibliography

Aalders, C. (2018). ‘Serious books’ and ‘excellent meditations’: Recovering religion in Catherine Talbot’s reading. Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 41(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583489.2018.1515482
Aarmstrong, S. (2019). Listening with respect. Religious Studies and Theology, 38(1-2), 193–194. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.37416
Aarø, A. F. (2020). Ricoeur's historical intentionality and the great goddess freyja: Some problems in the phenomenology of religion and interpretations in the study of religions. Temenos, 56(1), 75–76. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.80350
Aaron Simmons, J. (2020). Prospects for pentecostal philosophy assessing the challenges and envisioning the opportunities. Pneuma, 42(2), 199–200. https://brill.com/view/journals/pneu/42/2/article-p175_2.xml
Ab Rahman, Z., Kashim, M. I. A. M., & Mohd Noor, A. Y. (2021). Critical review of religion in coping against the COVID-19 pandemic by former COVID-19 Muslim patients in Russia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(5), 1145–1146. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/en/covidwho-819971
Dube, B. (2020). Religious leaders as regime enablers: the need for family and religious studies in Russia. Russian Journal of Religious Education, 43(1), 46–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2020.1815174
Jayne, A., Koch, J. M., & Federici, D. J. (2021). Predictors of sex anxiety: emphasis on religion in childhood, religious values, and family communication. Sexuality and Culture, 25(2), 538–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12119-020-09781-X
Jones, D. E., Dulbecco, P., & Cunial, S. L. (2021). The role of sexuality in religious responses to problematic drug use in Argentina. Drugs and Alcohol Today. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/in-sight/content/doi/10.1108/DAT-08-2020-0054/full/html
Jong, J. (2021). Death anxiety and religion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.004
Poruthiyil, P. V. (2020). Religious ethics: An antidote for religious nationalism. Business and Society, 59(5), 1059–1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317745635
Rowatt, W. C., & Al-Kire, R. L. (2020). Dimensions of religiousness and their connection to racial, ethnic, and atheist prejudices. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.022
Saroglou, V., & Craninx, M. (2021). Religious moral righteousness over care: a review and a meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 79–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.002
Scheitle, C. P., Kowalski, B. M., Hudnall, E. B., & Dabbs, E. (2021). Religion, family, and career among graduate students in the sciences. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 60(1), 131–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12693
Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2021). Do religious people self-enhance? Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.002
Streib, H. (2021). Leaving religion: deconversion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.007
Van Cappellen, P., Edwards, M. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2021). Upward spirals of positive emotions and religious behaviors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 92–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.004
Vorontsov, S. (2021). The priest in light of the thought style theory: Hierarchical and official descriptions. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta, Seria I. Bogoslovie, Filosofia, Religiovedenie, 91, 32–33.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yulia P. Savickaya
1
Yuliya I. Koltunova
1
Tatiana E. Derikot
1

  1. Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In Christian ethical and anthropological discourse, the concept of “human nature” represented one of the main criteria from which norms for social and individual ethics derived. The age of Enlightenment brought about a serious criticism of this concept refusing its metaphysical justification. New opinions prevailed in philosophical and scientific discourse of that time. They rejected existence of common anthropological determinants and supported a thesis claiming that people are primarily formed in society and that the concept of “human nature” entails a risk of abuse of power by promoting only one view of the human being. The presented paper studies the relevance of this concept today and examines it from the perspective of Jonathan Haidt’s social psychology, which, as the author claims, contributes to better understanding of human nature. Standard metaphysical and theological definitions of human nature that prevailed mostly in Christian discourse needs to be extended by including findings from social and exact sciences and use them as a suitable medium for a dialogue in a pluralistic environment, and push the limits of our knowledge about humans.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Radovan Šoltés
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Diffusion of responsibility is a well-known effect widely studied in a real-life setting. It can occur in a situation in which the more people observe a crisis event, the less likely it is that someone will react and provide real assistance. These days of a galloping digital revolution a question is to be raised as to whether the same effect can be observed in the online space of communication. In order to investigate this phenomenon we designed a study aimed at testing whether people exposed to a situation of cyberbullying will decide to take action against it depending on how many other Internet users are also aware of that crisis. Results obtained by us confirmed the existence of the diffusion of responsibility in the Internet similar to that observed in our daily lives. We also confirmed that a well-known influence technique “Even a penny will help” (in our study “every reaction will help”) can be effectively used to model behaviour online. In our times of digital revolution, those outcomes can be a step both toward understanding human behaviour in the online setting, showing us that it is not that different from the one presented in real live face-to-face communication and toward helping deal with antisocial behaviour people face online on a daily basis.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Kuś
1
Agata Kocimska-Bortnowska
1

  1. SWPS University, Wroclaw, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Since the 1970s, social psychology has investigated real human behavior to an increasingly smaller degree. The author of the article suggests that the phenomenon of cognitive revolution in psychology naturally boosted the interest of researchers in such phenomena like attitudes, values, social judgments and stereotypes; at the same time, it decreased interest in others important topics like aggression, social influence or altruism. In recent decades, we have also witnessed a growing conviction among social psychologists that explaining why people perform certain actions holds greater importance that demonstrating the conditions under which people really display particular reactions. The key question appears in this situation of whether social psychology remains of science of (real) behavior, and whether the current condiction of the discipline is desirable or rather pathological.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Doliński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Forty years of research on Unrealistic Optimism - a delusion that negative events are less likely and positive events are more likely to happen to oneself (in comparison to others) - has proved to be robust. Importantly, as a result, people holding this bias reduce their engagement in health prevention and following medical recommendations, etc., leading to the conclusion that this bias is dangerous. However, there is hardly any research on how to reduce this bias. To address this issue, an experiment in the real-life context of the COVID-19 pandemic was run. It was found that participants’ Unrealistic Optimism was reduced when they were exposed to the behavior of others who did not follow medical recommendations.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Kulesza
1
ORCID: ORCID
Dariusz Doliński
2
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Muniak
1
ORCID: ORCID
Kamil Izydorczak
2
ORCID: ORCID
Rafał Węgrzyn
3
ORCID: ORCID
Aidana Rizulla
4
ORCID: ORCID

  1. SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
  2. SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland
  3. University of Wrocław, Wroclaw, Poland
  4. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more