Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

There is an ongoing search for technologies that guarantee soybean productivity. Among them, the application of phytosanitary products stands out, since the sprayer is the most required implement during the agricultural production cycle and each error, in practice, represents a loss in the production process. With this in mind, the objective of this work was to evaluate the volume captured and the characteristics of the application in the different thirds of soybean plants with variations in hydraulic nozzles and spray volumes, as well as the use of electrification of the drops. To this end, a field experiment was conducted during the 2018/2019 summer harvest in an experimental area at the University of Rio Verde. The experimental design used was randomized blocks in a factorial scheme (3 × 4), with four repetitions, in which the first factor consisted of three variations of spray nozzles (simple fan, hollow cone and hollow cone with electrification of the drops). The second factor involved four application rates (50, 100, 150 and 200 l · ha–1). The variables evaluated were the number of drops per cm–2, percentage of coverage, volume median diameter (VMD) and the captured volume (μl · cm–2). According to the results, for the upper thirds, an increase in the application rate increased the volume of captured syrup. However, for the lower third, the factors evaluated did not interfere in this characteristic. The hydraulic tips influenced the density of droplets in the three thirds and the coverage only in the lower one. The increasing rates of application, increases the density of drops and percentage of coverage in the different thirds of the plants. The evaluated factors had no effect on the syrup distribution on the median abaxial surface of the leaves.
Go to article

Bibliography


Baldin E.L.L., Cruz P.L., Morando R., Silva I.F., Bentivenha J.P.F., Tozin L.R.S., Rodrigues T.M. 2017. Characterization of antixenosis in soybean genotypes to Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) biotype B. Journal of Economic Entomology 110 (4): 1869–1876. DOI: 10.1093/ jee/tox143
Bayer T., Costa I.F.D., Lenz G., Zemolin C., Marques L.N., Stefanelo M.S. 2011. Equipamento de pulverização aérea e taxas de aplicação de fungicida na cultura do arroz irrigado. [Spraying equipment and rates of fungicide application in irrigated rice]. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 15 (2): 192–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/ S1415-43662011000200007
Belo M.S.S.P., Pignati W., Dores E.F.G.C., Moreira J.C.M., Peres F. 2012. Uso de agrotóxicos na produção de soja do Estado do Mato Grosso: um estudo preliminar de riscos ocupacionais e ambientais. [Pesticide use in soybean pro-duction in Mato Grosso state, Brazil: A preliminary occupational and environmental risk characterization]. Revista Brasileira Saude Ocupacional 37 (125): 78–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572012000100011
Boschini L., Robinson L.C., Macedo Junior E.K., Guimaraes V.F.G. 2008. Avaliacao da deposicao da calda de pulverizacao em funcao da vazao e do tipo de bico hidraulico na cultura da soja. [Evaluation the spraying syrup deposition in function of the beak type and the flow, in soybean]. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 30 (2): 171–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v30i2.1789
Chaim A., Camargo Neto J., Pessoa M.C.P.Y. 2006. Uso do programa computacional Gotas para avaliacao da deposicao de pulverizacao aerea sob diferentes condicoes climaticas. [Use of the gotas software for evaluation of the deposition of aerial spraying under different climatic conditions]. Research and Development Bulletin 39: 18. Climate data. 2020. Climate Rio Verde. Available on: https://pt.climate-data.org/america-do-sul/brasil/goias/rio-verde- 4473/. [Accessed: 13 July 2020]
Cunha J.P.A.R., Marques R.S., Alves G.S. 2016. Deposicao da calda na cultura da soja em funcao de diferentes pressoes de trabalho e pontas de pulverizacao. [Spray deposition on soybean crop as a function of different service pressures and spray nozzles]. Revista Ceres 63 (6): 761–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201663060003
Cunha J.P.A.R., Reis E.F., Santos R.O. 2006. Controle quimico de ferrugem asiatica da soja em funcao de ponta de pulverizacao e de volume de calda. [Chemical control of Asian soybean rust due to spray tip and spray volume]. Ciencia Rural 36 (5): 1360–1366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/ S0103-84782006000500003
Czaczyk Z., Kruger G., Hewitt A. 2012. Droplet size classification of air induction flat fan nozzles. Journal of Plant Protection Research 52 (4): 415–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/10045-012-0068-6
Durao C.F., Boller W. 2017. Spray nozzles performance in fungicides applications for Asian soybean rust control. Engenharia Agricola 37 (4): 709–716. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v37n4p709-716/2017
Farinha J.V., Martins D., Costa N.V., Domingos V.D. 2009. Deposicao da calda de aplicacao em cultivares de soja no estadio R1. Ciencia Rural 39 (6): 1738–1744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009000600016
Fehr W.R., Caviness C.E. 1997. Stages of Soybean Development. Ames: Iowa State University, USA, 12 pp. (Special Report, 80).
Fritz B.K., Hoffman W.C., Czaczyk Z., Bagley W., Kruger G., Henry R. 2012. Measurement and classification methods using the ASAE S572.1 reference nozzles. Journal of Plant Protection Research 52 (4): 447–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-012-0072x
Furlan S.H., Carvalho F.K., Antuniassi U.R. 2018. Strategies for the control of Asian soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) in Brazil: fungicide resistance and application efficacy. Outlooks on Pest Management 29 (3): 120–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1564/v29_jun_05
Law S.E. 2014. Electrostatically charged sprays. In: “Pesticide Application Methods” (G.A. Matthews, ed.). 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, USA, 545 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/ S1415-43662011000200007
Negrisoli M.M., Raetano C.G., Souza D.M., Souza F.M.S., Bernardes L.M., Bem Junior L., Rodrigues D.M., Sartori M.M.P. 2019. Performance of new flat fan nozzle design in spray deposition, penetration and control of soybean rust. European Journal of Plant Pathology 155 (7): 1–13. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01803-1
Nidera. 2020. NS 7709 IPRO. Available on: http://www.niderasementes. com.br/produto/ns-7709-ipro.aspx. [Accessed: 13 July 2020]
Omoto P.H., Tomaz R.S., Prado E.P. 2017. Quantificacao dos depositos da pulverizacao em funcao da tecnica de aplicacao na cultura da soja. [Quantification of spray deposits as a function of soybean application technique]. Forum Ambiental da Alta Paulista 13 (7): 120–134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17271/1980082713720171732
Patel M.K., Praveen B., Sahoo H.K., Patel B., Kumar A., Singh M., Nayak M.K., Rajan P. 2017. An advance air-induced air-assisted electrostatic nozzle with enhanced performance. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 135 (4): 280–288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.02.010
Sasaki R.S., Teixeira M.M., Fernandes H.C., Monteiro P.M.B., Rodrigues D.E. 2013. Deposicao e uniformidade de distribuicao de calda de aplicacao em plantas de cafe utilizando a pulverizacao eletrostatica. [Deposition and uniformity of spray syrup distribution in coffee plants using electrostatic spraying]. Ciencia Rural 43 (9): 1605–1609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013000900011
Scudeler F., Raetano C.G. 2006. Spray deposition and losses in potato as a function of air-assistance and sprayer boom angle. Scientia Agricola 63 (6): 515–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000600001
Silva J.E.R., Cunha J.P.A.R., Nomelini Q.S.S. 2014a. Deposicao de calda em folhas de cafeeiro e perdas para o solo com diferentes taxas de aplicacao e pontas de pulverizacao. [Deposition of spray applied in coffee leaves with different rates and spray nozzles]. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental 18 (12): 1302–1306. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v18n12p1302-1306
Silva B.M.B., Ruas R.D.A., Sichocki D., Dezordi L.R., Caixeta L.F. 2014b. Deposicao da calda de pulverizacao aplicada com pontas de jato plano em diferentes partes da planta de soja (Glycine max) e milho (Zea mays). [Spray spray deposition applied with flat spray tips to different parts of the soybean plant (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays)]. Engenharia na Agricultura 22 (1): 17–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13083/reveng.v22i1.406
Souza D.M., Raetano C.G., Moreira C.A.F., Burno R.C.O.F., Carvalho M.M. 2019. Effects of news sowing arrangements and air assistance on fungicide spray distribution on soybean crop. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 41 (1): e42700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.42700
Tavares R.M., Silva J.E.R., Alves G.S., Alves T.C., Silva S.M.,
Cunha J.P.A.R. 2017. Tecnologia de aplicacao de inseticidas no controle da lagarta-do-cartucho na cultura do milho. [Insecticide application technology on fall armyworm control in corn]. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo 16 (1): 30–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v16n1p30-42%20
Van Zyl J.G., Fourie P.H., Schutte G.C. 2013. Spray deposition assessment and benchmarks for control of Alternaria brown spot on mandarin leaves with copper oxychloride. Crop Protection 46 (4): 80–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cropro.2012.12.005
Viana R.G., Ferreira L.R., Ferreira M.C., Teixeira M.M., Rosell J.R., Tuffi-Santos L.D., Machado A.F.L. 2010. Distribuicao volumetrica e espectro de gotas de pontas de pulverizacao de baixa deriva. [Volumetric distribution and droplet spectrum by low drift spray nozzles]. Planta Daninha 28 (2): 439–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000200024
Zhou Y., Qi L., Jia S., Zheng X., Meng X., Tang Z., Shen C. 2012. Development and application prospects of pneumatic electrostatic sprayer in orchard. Asian Agricultural Research 4 (1): 78–80. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.133110
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Carlos Eduardo Leite Mello
1
ORCID: ORCID
Eduardo Lima do Carmo
1
ORCID: ORCID
Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Gustavo André Simon
1
ORCID: ORCID
João Vitor Alves de Sousa
1
Ana Carolina Pereira dos Reis
1
Marco Túlio Moura Leite
1
Gabriel Elias Soares de Araújo
1

  1. Agronomia, Universidade de Rio Verde, Rio Verde, Brazil
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Improving application efficiency is crucial for both the economic and environmental aspects of plant protection. Mathematical models can help in understanding the relationships between spray application parameters and efficiency, and reducing the negative impact on the environment. The effect of nozzle type, spray pressure, driving speed and spray angle on spray coverage on an artificial plant was studied. Artificial intelligence techniques were used for modeling and the optimization of application process efficiency. The experiments showed a significant effect of droplet size on the percent area coverage of the sprayed surfaces. A high value of the vertical transverse approach surface coverage results from coarse droplets, high driving speed, and nozzles angled forward. Increasing the vertical transverse leaving surface coverage, as well as the coverage of the sum of all sprayed surfaces, requires fine droplets, low driving speed, and nozzles angled backwards. The maximum coverage of the upper level surface is obtained with coarse droplets, low driving speed, and a spray angle perpendicular to the direction of movement. The choice of appropriate nozzle type and spray pressure is an important aspect of chemical crop protection. Higher upper level surface coverage is obtained when single flat fan nozzles are used, while twin nozzles produce better coverage of vertical surfaces. Adequate neural models and evolutionary algorithms can be used for pesticide application process efficiency optimization.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

B. Cieniawska
K. Pentoś
D. Łuczycka

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more