Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 8
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The question of the state affiliation of Upper Silesia which arose after WWI has been treated and perceived by today’s historians, if at all, as a typical German-Polish border conflict. Really however, it was both a European and an international problem of utmost significance. In it, French hegemonic and safety efforts, accumulated in and collided with Britain‘s classic policy of continental equilibrium. Both, Poland with its territorial claim on Upper Silesia and Germany in its struggle to preserve its territorial integrity, thus were not only players of political, diplomatic and military struggles for the second most important European industrial region, but rather objects of the interests of European great powers. This applied even more to the population which was actually to vote in the referendum on Upper Silesia affiliation. However, in its effort to weaken Germany and simultaneously gain control over the Ruhr, France favoured its ally Poland, to a much greater extent than Britain could in respect of Germany.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Guido Hitze
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In its first part, the essay deals with some issues related to the Italian translation of Miron Białoszewski’s Pamiętnik z powstania warszawskiego (1970) from a comparative perspective with the American (1977, 2015), French (2002), Spanish (2011), and German (2019) translations. In its second part, the paper reviews the critical reception of the Italian edition (2021) of this classic of twentieth-century Polish literature.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Luca Bernardini
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Università degli Studi di Milano
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the article the Author discusses the problem of works devoted to the January Uprising of 1863, prepared by Polish historians for the 50th anniversary of the event. She asks what was the character of the various publications printed on consecutive anniversaries of the uprising, and - more broadly - what were the social functions of these texts. Answering the question. Author claims that these publications had social role going far beyond the traditional, scientific function of a typical historic text
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Lidia Michalska-Bracha
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The essay will focus on a mid-nineteenth century medallion from the vast collection of Polish bibliophile Ludwik Gocel (1889–1966). Made in 1854 in the U.S. capital, Washington, D.C., it depicts a prominent nineteenth century American, Judge Charles Mason (1804–1882), and is a valuable token of the U.S. history. It was designed and completed by Polish distinguished medalist, Henryk Dmochowski (in the U.S. known as Henry Dmochowski Saunders; b. 1810–d. 1863) who can be called a “soldier-artist,” since he participated in three Polish uprisings. Expelled from partitioned Poland, in 1851 he came to America where he was offered the chance to work as a sculptor. This essay’s main aim is to describe the fate of the medallion, apparently almost unknown in both America and Poland, with special emphasis on the role of Ludwik Gocel in its preservation. This rare piece of art has never been included in Polish or American art publications in the field of sculpture.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jacek Serwański
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. The Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Professor Mieczysław Chorąży, one of the most eminent Polish biomedical scientists, died on February 20, 2021 at the age of 95. He was bid farewell with military honors at the Powązki Military Cemetary in Warsaw. He was buried close to his comrades in arms from the 1944 Warsaw Uprising. Mieczysław Chorąży was born in Janówka, a small village in Podlasie, in 1925. His education was interrupted by the outbreak of World War II which took away his mother, who died of typhus. He then decided to become a doctor. He was a member of the Home Army and fought in the Warsaw Uprising as soldier (nickname “Grom”) of the Baszta Regiment. In 1951 he graduated from the Medical Academy in Warsaw and was ordered to work at the then State Cancer Institute in Gliwice where he remained professionally active until the very end of his life. Following scientific internships at McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research in Madison and Sloan- Kettering Institute for Cancer Research in New York in the early sixties he developed a method for isolating metaphase chromosomes from murine lymphocytic leukemia cells, used in DNA uptake experiments. In the 70s, he studied repeating and unique DNA sequences, DNA transcription mechanisms, activity of RNA polymerases and inhibition of cancer cell replication. Together with Kazimierz Dux, he authored in 1973 the “Introduction to the biology of cancer”, which at the time was the most important work in the field in Polish scientific literature. Mieczysław Chorąży was an outstanding authority in the field of environmental
mutagenesis and molecular epidemiology. The results of his research on DNA and chromosome damage in people from industry-polluted areas aroused wide interest worldwide. His Laboratory of Environmental Mutagenesis showed aberrations in metaphasal chromosomes caused by air pollution and correlated DNA adduct levels with concentration of polycyclic hydrocarbons in the air, including known carcinogens. Professor Chorąży research team revealed distinctive spectrum of mutations in the p53 suppressor gene among the inhabitants of Upper Silesia and characterized gene polymorphisms that determine individual sensitivity to carcinogens and functioning of DNA repair system. In his late years, Professor Mieczysław Chorąży was passionate about systems biology, research into chaos and early life on Earth. He was the supervisor of 18 doctoral theses, and five of his doctoral students later became professors. In the darker times of Poland’s national past, thanks to his wisdom and foresight, contacts were maintained with eminent researchers abroad allowing many Poles to pursue training in the USA, France, Germany and elsewhere. At the Professor’s initiative young scientists from the countries that emerged after the collapse of the USSR were able to continue their research in Gliwice thanks to scholarship awards granted by EACR and NCI-NIH. Mieczysław Chorąży was appointed professor in 1983. He was a doctor h.c. of medical universities in Katowice and Białystok. Since 1986 he was a full member of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Professor was also the member of Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences, American Association for Cancer Research, European Association for Cancer Research, Polish Biochemical Society, Polish Cancer Society (president 1974–1978), member of the scientific councils of Oncology Center in Warsaw, the Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy in Wrocław, the Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Poznań and the Center for Polymer and Carbon Materials in Zabrze. In recognition of his scientific achievements and involvement in social and educational activities, insurgent struggle and shaping patriotic attitudes, Professor Mieczysław Chorąży received numerous distinctions and awards, including the Order of the White Eagle (2017), Polish supreme distinction. He was then eulogized as the “…nestor of oncology in Poland, outstanding scientist, founder of the Polish school of cancer biology, Warsaw insurgent, social activist, teacher and moral authority”. Professor received also the Lux ex Silesia award (2018) in recognition to his lasting contribution to the protection of Silesian cultural heritage. Professor Chorąży always opposed imprudent demolition of the reminders of industrial past of Upper Silesia, advocated sustainable development, and protecting green areas. Among various talents, Professor Chorąży was blessed with a gift of painting. Some of his watercolors and sketches embellish today the hall of the National Institute of Oncology in Gliwice. But Mieczysław Chorąży, the true man of virtue, will be perhaps best remembered for his kindness and concern for others, which brought him respect and love. He will be missed by very many people from all walks of life. Honor to His memory!
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Lisowska
1
Zdzisław Krawczyk
2

  1. Centrum Badań Translacyjnych i Biologii Molekularnej Nowotworów, Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Oddział w Gliwicach
  2. Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Oddział w Gliwicach
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article is intended as an updated addendum to the history of the reception of Jakub Szela, leader of the peasant uprising in Galicia in 1846, in Franciszek Ziejka’s Złota legenda chłopów polskich [ The Golden Legend of Polish Peasants], published in 1984. It seems that practically all of the accounts of the bloody events of 1846 follow either of two master narratives distinguished by their characteristic patterns of sidetracking and omissions. The two narratives also differ in their contrarian ideological leanings and aesthetic sensitivity. Another important observation concerns the congruence of the narrative written by the gentry and the traditional national history, and a similar congruence of the peasant narrative with the approach of social history.
Go to article

Bibliography

● Anczyc L., Zbój galicyjski z roku 1846, [b.m. 1848].
● Bereza H., Związki naturalne. Szkice literackie, Warszawa 1978.
● Białas S., Jakub Szela. Kim był?, Kraków 2006.
● Bogusz A., Wieś Siedliska-Bogusz. Monografia zebrana z dokumentów i wspomnień rodzinnych ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem wypadków roku 1846 i życiorysu Jakóba Szeli, Kraków 1903.
● Bołoz Antoniewicz K., Wspomnienia misyjne z roku 1846, Poznań 1855.
● Burszta J., Chłopskie źródła kultury, Warszawa 1985.
● Chajec W., „Rabacja na panów”, czyli powstanie chłopów. „Kamena” 1965, z. 4.
● Chłopska (nie)pamięć. Dziedzictwo chłopskości w polskiej literaturze i kulturze, red. G. Grochowski, D. Krawczyńska i G. Wołowiec, Kraków 2019.
● Daszyk K., „Mnóstwo Kainów jest wśród nas”. Rok 1846 i demitologizacja romantyczno-rewolucyjnej tezy o ludzie jako przyszłym wskrzesicielu Polski, [w:] Rewolucja czy praca organiczna drogami do niepodległości? W 150. rocznicę wydarzeń 1846 r., red. M. Drozdowski, Poznań 1997.
● Dembiński S., Rok 1846. Kronika dworów szlacheckich zebrana na pięćdziesięcioletnią rocznicę smutnych wypadków lutego…, Jasło 1896.
● Dębicki L., Z dawnych wspomnień 1846–1848, Kraków 1903.
● Fiećko J., Rok 1846 w romantycznej legendzie literackiej, [w:] Rewolucja czy praca organiczna drogami do niepodległości? W 150. rocznicę wydarzeń 1846 r., red. M. Drozdowski, Poznań 1997.
● Frančić M., Rok 1846 w świadomości historycznej Polaków, [w:] Rewolucja czy praca organiczna drogami do niepodległości? W 150. rocznicę wydarzeń 1846 r., red. M. Drozdowski, Poznań 1997.
● Jabłoneczka. Antologia polskiej pieśni ludowej, oprac. J. Przyboś, Warszawa 1957.
● Janion M. i Żmigrodzka M., Tragedia historyczna 1846 roku, [w:] tychże, Romantyzm i historia, Warszawa 1976.
● Kaczkowski Z, Domek rodzinny II, [w:] tegoż, Pieśni z otchłani, Lwów 1920.
● Kaczkowski Z., Obrazek z powstania r. 1846, „Dziennik Mód Paryskich” 1848, nr 15.
● Kaps K., Nielojalni, bydlęcy, niecywilizowani. Postrzeganie galicyjskich chłopów z czasów ok. 1846 roku w longue durée, [w:] Rok 1846 w Krakowie i Galicji. Odniesienia, interpretacje, pamięć, red. K.K. Daszyk, T. Kargol i T. Szubert, Kraków 2016.
● Kieniewicz S., Ruch chłopski w Galicji w 1846 roku, Wrocław 1951.
● Korczyński P., Śladami Szeli, czyli diabły polskie, Warszawa 2020.
● Koziebrodzki W., Ciocia Tekla, „Niewiasta” 1861, nr 39.
● Koźmian A.E., Rok 1846, Poznań 1868.
● Leder A., Relacja folwarczna, https://krytykapolityczna.pl/kraj/leder-relacja-folwarczna/ (dostęp: 17.02.2021).
● Leszczyński A., Ludowa historia Polski, Warszawa 2020.
● Łuczewski K., Odwieczny naród. Polak i katolik w Żmiącej, Toruń 2012.
● Markiewka T.S., Gniew, Wołowiec 2020.
● Ostaszewski-Barański K., Krwawy rok. Opowiadanie historyczne, Złoczów 1897.
● Pasieka A., Opór, dominacja i teoria społeczna na przełomie XX i XXI, [w:] Opór i dominacja. Antologia tekstów, red. A. Pasieka, K. Zielińska, Kraków 2015.
● Pigoń S., Uwłaszczenie literackie chłopa, [w:] tegoż, Na drogach i manowcach kultury ludowej. Szkice, Lwów 1939.
● Poklewska K., Krew na śniegu. Rzecz o rabacji galicyjskiej w literaturze polskiej, Wrocław– Warszawa 1986.
● Pol W., Dzieła wierszem i prozą, t. IX, Lwów 1878.
● Porter-Szücs B., Całkiem zwyczajny kraj. Historia Polski bez martyrologii, tłum. A. i J. Dzierzgowscy, Warszawa 2021.
● Rauszer M., Bękarty pańszczyzny. Historia buntów chłopskich, Warszawa 2020.
● Rawiński M., Rok 1846 w literackiej legendzie, [w:] Literatura polska wobec rewolucji, Warszawa 1971.
● Rok 1846 w Galicji. Materiały źródłowe, zebrali i opracowali J. Sieradzki i C. Wycech, Warszawa 1958.
● Schnürr-Pepłowski S., Krwawa karta. Opowieść z przeszłości Galicji, Lwów 1896.
● Sloterdijk P., Gniew i czas. Esej polityczno-psychologiczny, tłum. A. Żychliński, Warszawa 2011.
● Słotwiński H., Z krwawych dni, Lwów 1890 (wyd. następne Dębica 2008).
● Stefanowska Z., Literackie role chłopa, [w:] tejże, Mapa romantyzmu polskiego. Pisma z lat 1964–2007, Warszawa 2015.
● Szubert T., Jak(ó)b Szela (14) 15 lipca 1787–21 kwietnia 1860, Warszawa 2014.
● Szujski J., Czyste dusze i mętne dusze, „Dziennik Literacki” 1861, nr 20.
● Śliwa F., Hrabia Wiesiołowski. Dramat historyczny z powstania 1846 r., Mielec 1995.
● Tessarczyk A., Rzeź galicyjska roku 1846, czyli szczegółowy opis dokonanych morderstw, rozbojów i łupiestw, wraz z ważnymi wypadkami, jakie tym okropnym scenom towarzyszyły w związku z intrygami biurokracji, Kraków 1848.
● Traciłowski K.R., Jakub Szela, Puławy-Rudki 2011.
● Ujejski K., Chorał, [w:] tegoż, Wybór poezji i prozy, oprac. K. Poklewska, Wrocław 1992.
● Wolff L., Idea Galicji. Historia i fantazja w kulturze politycznej Habsburgów, tłum. T. Bieroń, Kraków 2020.
● Z. Szymiczkowa [J. Dehnel, P. Tarczyński], Złoty róg, Kraków 2020.
● Ziejka F., Dwie legendy o Jakubie Szeli, „Kwartalnik Historyczny” 1969, nr 4.
● Ziejka F., Jakub Szela, [w:] Życiorysy historyczne, literackie i legendarne, red. Z. Stefanowska i J. Tazbir, Warszawa 1980.
● Ziejka F., Misjonarz pośród rabantów, [w:] Rok 1846 w Galicji. Ludzie, wydarzenia, tradycje. Zbiór studiów, red. M. Śliwa, Kraków 1997.
● Ziejka F., W kręgu mitów polskich, Kraków 1977 (wyd. następne Wesele w kręgu mitów polskich, Kraków 1983).
● Ziejka F., Złota legenda chłopów polskich, Warszawa 1984.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iwona Węgrzyn
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

At the turn of the 20th century, the January Uprising of 1863 was one of the focal points of Polish collective memory, shared by the Polish communities abroad. Their press marked the subsequent anniversaries of the Uprising with due solemnity, highlighting its importance for the history of the nation and seeking to engage its readers in a common show of respect. Editors of the Polish-language newspapers in the USA followed the same line, using the commemoration as a means to consolidate the unity of the Polish-American community.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Krzysztof Wasilewski
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wydział Humanistyczny, Politechnika Koszalińska, ul. Kwiatkowskiego 6e, PL 75-343 Koszalin
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this article Maurycy Mochnacki’s martyrological and messianic declarations in the Preface to the Uprising of the Polish Nation in 1830–1831 are examined in the context of the martyrological discourse in the literature of the Great Emigration. Such an affirmation may appear puzzling given Mochnacki’s rejection of martyrological interpretations of Poland’s history or messianic readings of his political philosophy, let alone his reputation of being radically opposed to Adam Mickiewicz’s idea of the sacrifi cial victimhood of the Polish nation. In this study the ideological and rhetorical aspects of their statements are compared and analysed. There can be little doubt that in the Preface Mochnacki’s phrasing is steeped in patriotic pathos which seems to be at odds with the tone of his other writings. This article claims that it was a tactical move on his part: he chose the familiar martyrological loci merely as a means to enlist the readers’ support for his own pragmatic programme of restoring Poland’s independence. A general conclusion to be drawn from this apparent inconsistency is that already at that stage (The Uprising was published in Paris in 1834) the logosphere of the Great Emigration had become so dominated by the martyrological discourse that Mochnacki could not afford to ignore it.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Makiko Kihara

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more