@ARTICLE{Wierzchosławski_Rafał_Paweł_Protestant_2021,
 author={Wierzchosławski, Rafał Paweł},
 volume={Tom 9},
 number={Część 1},
 journal={Filozofia i Nauka},
 pages={49-66},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2021},
 publisher={Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN},
 publisher={Instytut filozofii UMCS},
 abstract={In this article, I reflect on recent discussions of the methodological status of scientific knowledge within and outside the Academy. I draw attention to the problem of declining public trust in science (risk and fear society) and the phenomenon of post-truth. In the context of these issues, I present three positions whose authors define the relationship between official academic science in relation to other forms of knowledge (lay people) and forms of knowledge use outside the Academy (politics). The first position termed “elective modernism” was formulated by Harry Collins and Robert Evans in the context of discussions of the third wave of science disputes. Elective modernism defines the way in which policy decisions are made on the recommendations of scholars who have a methodological self-awareness of the possibilities and limitations of scientific knowledge. The second position is Steve Fuller's proposal of protestant science as a form of science in the context of posttruth conditions. In this view, knowledge can be produced by anyone, but it must meet certain specified scientific criteria. The third position is the view of expert knowledge proposed by Mark R. Brown, as a representation of various worldview or cultural options, whose representatives commission experts to make appropriate recommendations for certain political decisions.},
 type={Artykuły / Articles},
 title={Protestant Science, Elective Modernism and Expert Knowledge in the Context of the Functioning of Science Outside the Academy},
 URL={http://czasopisma.pan.pl/Content/121451/PDF/6_FiN%209%20cz.%201-2021_Wierzchoslawski.pdf},
 keywords={Protestant science, academic rent, post-truth condition, customized science, third wave of science studies, expert knowledge, social conditions of science, politics of science, representation, Steve Fuller, Harry Collins, Robert Evans, Mark R. Brown, risk society, fear society},
}