Title

Socially oriented preferences in decision making and their relation with work and home environment

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2012

Issue

No 2

Authors

Hełka, Anna

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Date

2012

Identifier

DOI: 10.2478/v10059-012-0013-6

Source

Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2012; No 2

References

Adams J. (1963), Towards an understanding of inequity, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 5, 422, doi.org/10.1037/h0040968 ; Ahn T. (2001), Cooperation in PD games: Fear, greed, and history of play, Public Choice, 106, 1/2, 137, doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9158-9 ; Andreoni J. (2001), Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293, doi.org/10.1162/003355301556419 ; Ariely D. (2008), Predictably Irrational. The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. ; Bolton G. (1995), An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior?, Economics Letters, 48, 287, doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(94)00621-8 ; Brannon L. (1999), Gender: Psychological Perspectives. ; Comrey A. (1978), Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 648, doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.648 ; Cronk L. (2007), The influence of cultural framing on play in the trust game: a Massai example, Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 352, doi.org/10.1234/12345678 ; Doherty A. (1998), Managing our human resources: a review of organisational behaviour in sport, Sport Management Review, 1, 1, 1, doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3523(98)70097-X ; Ellemers N. (2004), Motivating individuals and groups at Work: A social identity perspective on Leadership and group performance, Academy of Management Review, 29, 459, doi.org/10.2307/20159054 ; Fehr E. (1999), A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 3, 817, doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151 ; Fehr E. (2002), Why social preferences matter - the impact of non selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives, The Economic Journal, 112, doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00027 ; Festinger L. (1957), A theory of cognitive dissonance. ; Franken R. (1995), Why do people like competition? The motivation for winning, putting forth effort, improving one's performance, performing well, being instrumental, and expressing forceful/aggressive behavior, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 2, 175, doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00035-5 ; Gill D. (1988), Competitive orientations among intercollegiate athletes: Is winning the only thing?, The Sport Psychologist, 2, 212. ; Grzelak J. (2004), Psychologia ekonomiczna, 243. ; Grzelak J. (2001), Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki, 3, 107. ; Grzelak J. (1978), Konflikt interesów. Analiza Psychologiczna. ; Heider F. (1958), The psychology of interpersonal relations, doi.org/10.1037/10628-000 ; Herrmann B. (2011, July), Some Experimental Findings on the Dark Side of Human Behaviour, null. ; Herrmann B. (2008), Anti-social punishment across societies, Science, 319/5868, 1362, doi.org/10.1126/science.1153808 ; Kahneman D. (1979), Prospect theory. An analysis on decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 263, doi.org/10.2307/1914185 ; Kosfeld, M., & von Siemens, F. (2007). Competition, Cooperation, and Corporate Culture. <i>Working Paper No. 328 Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.</i> University of Zurich Working Paper Series ISSN 1424-0459. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00124.x ; Kozielecki J. (1970), Konflikt, teoria gier i psychologia. ; Kube, S., Maréchal, M.A., & Puppe, C. (2008). The Currency of Reciprocity Gift-Exchange in the Workplace. <i>Working Paper No. 328 Institute for Empirical Research in Economics</i> University of Zurich Working Paper Series ISSN 1424-0459. ; Larrick R. (1997), The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 4, 810, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.810 ; Latham G. (2002), Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation, The American Psychologist, 57, 9, 705, doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705 ; Latham G. (2004), Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227, doi.org/10.2307/20159574 ; Latham G. (2007), Work motivation. History, theory, research and practice. ; McClintock C. (1972), Social motivation — A set of propositions, Behavioral Science, 17, 438, doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830170505 ; Osiński J. (2003), Ewolucyjne wyjaśnienie zachowań altruistycznych człowieka, Studia Psychologiczne, 41, 2, 89. ; Pillutla M. (1999), Social norms and cooperation in social dilemmas: The effects of context and feedback, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 81, doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2825 ; Pinder C. (2008), Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. ; Ryska T. (2003), Sportsmanship in Young Athletes. The Role of Competitiveness Motivational Orientation and Perceived Purposes of Sport, Journal of Psychology, 137, 273, doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600614 ; (2011), XIX ogólnobranżowy raport płacowy 2010 rok. ; Skinner B. (1953), Science and Human Behaviour. ; Solnick S. (1998), Is more always better? A survey on positional concerns, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 373, doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00089-4 ; Tajfel H. (1974), Social identity and intergroup behaviour, Social Science Information, 13, 65, doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204 ; Turner J. (1987), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. ; Vohs K. (2006), The Psychological Consequences of Money, Science, 314, 1154, doi.org/10.1126/science.1132491 ; Wang X. (1996), Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts, Cognition, 60, 31, doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00700-8 ; Wojciszke B. (2001), Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki, 3, 144. ; Zaleśkiewicz T. (2007), Trening współpracy/rywalizacji jako forma wpływu na zachowanie ludzi w dwuosobowej grze zaufania, Decyzje, 7, 83.

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO