Title

When is a lie more of a lie? Moral judgment mediates the relationship between perceived benefits of others and lie-labeling

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2017

Issue

No 2

Authors

Cantarero, Katarzyna ; Szarota, Piotr

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Date

2017

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/ppb-2017-0036

Source

Polish Psychological Bulletin; 2017; No 2

References

McCloskey (1983), Intuitive physics Scientifi c, American, 4, 284. ; Wimmer (1985), Young children s conception of lying : Moral intuition and the denotation and connotation of to lie, Developmental Psychology, 21, 993. ; Parzuchowski (2016), Od skrajności do codzienności : współczesna psychologia ocen moralnych, Psychologia społeczna, 39, 388. ; Kim (2008), Deception : Moral transgression or social necessity ? Cultural - relativity of deception motivations and perceptions of perceptive communication Journal of International and Intercultural, Communication, 1. ; Kohlberg (1977), Moral Development : A Review of The Theory into, Theory Practice, 16, 53. ; Masip (2004), Defi ning deception, Anales de psicologia, 20, 147. ; Gray (2012), Mind perception is the essence of morality, Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101. ; Cheung (2016), Effects of lie labelling on children s evaluations of selfi sh polite and altruistic lies, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34, 325. ; Cheung (2015), The roles of liar intention lie content and theory of mind in children s evaluation of lies of, Journal Experimental Child Psychology, 132. ; Gray (2014), The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition : Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering of :, Journal Experimental Psychology General, 143. ; Gray (2015), in press ) No absolutism here : Harm predicts moral judgment x better than disgust - Commentary on Perspectives on, Psychological Science. ; Lindskold (1983), Categories for acceptability of lies The, Journal of Social Psychology, 120. ; Haidt (1993), Affect , culture and morality or is it wrong to eat your dog of and, Journal Personality Social Psychology, 65, 613. ; Brinke (2016), ten Can ordinary people detect deception after all in, Trends Cognitive Sciences, 20, 579. ; Turri (2015), The truth about lying, Cognition, 138. ; Haidt (2004), Intuitive ethics : How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues, Daedalus, 133, 55. ; Ning (2007), We believe in being honest : Examining subcultural differences in the acceptability of deception of, Journal Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2130. ; DePaulo (2003), Cues to deception, Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74. ; DePaulo (1996), Lying in everyday life of and, Journal Personality Social Psychology, 70, 979. ; Levine (2016), Toward a Pan - cultural Typology of Deception Motives Journal of Intercultural, Communication Research, 45, 1. ; Mealy (2007), The acceptability of lies : a comparison of Ecuadorians and Euro - Americans, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 689. ; Leach (2016), Less is more ? Detecting lies in veiled witnesses and, Law Human Behavior, 40, 401. ; Lee (1997), Chinese and Canadian children s evaluations of lying and truth telling : Similiarities and differences in the context of pro - and antisocial behaviors, Child Development, 68, 924. ; Cortina (1993), What is coeffi cient alpha ? An examination of theory and applications of, Journal Applied Psychology, 78. ; Wojciszke (2002), Jak odstrzelić sobie nogę : psychologiczne konsekwencje narzekania, Kolokwia Psychologiczne, 10, 213. ; Gray (2015), Disconfi rming Moral Foundations Theory on its own terms : Reply to Graham Social Psychological and Personality, Science, 1. ; Hardin (2010), The Spanish notion of lie : Revisiting Coleman and Kay, Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 12. ; Wojciszke (2015), Moral judgments and impressions Current Opinion in, Psychology, 6, 50. ; Holling (1965), The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation The Memoirs of the, Entomological Society of Canada, 97, 60. ; Strömwall (2003), How to detect deception ? Arresting the beliefs of police offi cers prosecutors and judges &, Psychology Crime Law, 9, 19. ; Aune (1994), Cultural differences in deception : motivations to deceit in Samoans and North Americans, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 159. ; Eichelberger (2013), A semantic and pragmatic analysis of the Spanish word lie : Implications and applications for the second language learner South Central Modern Language New Orleans, Association October. ; Fu (2007), Cross - cultural differences in children s choices categorizations and evaluations of truths and lies, Development Psychology, 43, 278. ; Granhag (2006), Rethinking implicit lie detection The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness, Psychology, 7, 180. ; Gray (2012), Two minds vs two philosophies : Mind perception defi nes morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism of and, Review Philosophy Psychology, 3, 1. ; Haidt (2001), The emotional dog and its rational tail : A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement, Psychological Review, 108, 814. ; Schein (2015), The uncensored truth about morality The, Psychologist, 28, 982. ; Levine (2014), Are liars ethical ? On the tension between benevolence and honesty of, Journal Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 107. ; Coleman (1981), Prototype semantics : The English word lie, Language, 57, 26. ; Buller (1996), Interpersonal Deception Theory, Communication Theory, 6, 203. ; Doliński (1996), The mystery of Polish soul Johnson s effect à rebours, European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 1001. ; Ekman (1969), Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception, Psychiatry, 32, 88. ; Schwab (2013), Deception by omission The, American Journal of Bioethics, 13, 11. ; Bugnyarf (2002), Observational learning and the raiding of food caches in ravens Corvus corax : is it tactical deception, Animal Behaviour, 64, 185. ; Kuczaj (2001), Are animals capable of deception or empathy ? Implications for animal consciousness and animal welfare, Animal Welfare, 10, 161. ; Cantarero (null), in press ) When is a lie acceptable ? Work and private life lying acceptance depends on its benefi ciary The, Journal of Social Psychology, doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1327404 ; Lakhani (2003), Beliefs about cues to deception in highand low - stake situations &, Psychology Crime Law, 9, 357.

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO