Details

Title

Morphology of immune organs after very virulent plus strain of Marek’s disease virus infection in vaccinated hens

Journal title

Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Yearbook

2016

Issue

No 2

Authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze

Publisher

Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Veterinary Sciences ; University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Date

2016

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/pjvs-2016-0040 ; ISSN 1505-1773

Source

Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences; 2016; No 2

References

Kano (2009), Microarray analysis of host immune responses to Marek s disease virus infection in vaccinated chickens, J Vet Med Sci, 603, doi.org/10.1292/jvms.71.603 ; Omar (1996), Syngeneic Marek s disease virus MDV - specific cellmediated immune responses against immediate early late and unique MDV proteins, Virology, 87, doi.org/10.1006/viro.1996.0400 ; Witter (2005), Classification of Marek s disease viruses according to pathotype : philosophy and methodology, Avian Pathol, 34, 75, doi.org/10.1080/03079450500059255 ; Hunt (2015), The Influence of Major Histocompatibility Complex and Vaccination with Turkey Herpesvirus on Marek s Disease Virus Evolution, Avian Dis, 122, doi.org/10.1637/10677-092413-Reg ; Perumbakkam (2014), Marek s disease virus influences the core gut microbiome of the chicken during the early and late phases of viral replication, FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 300, doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12392 ; Schat (2000), Specific and nonspecific immune responses to Marek s disease virus, Dev Comp Immunol, 201, doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(99)00073-7 ; Witter (1997), Increased virulence of Marek s disease virus field isolates, Avian Dis, 149, doi.org/10.2307/1592455 ; Woźniakowski (2014), Molecular evolution of Marek s disease virus MDV field strains in a - year time period, Avian Dis, 40, 550, doi.org/10.1637/10812-030614-Reg.1 ; Omar (1997), Characterization of Marek s disease herpesvirus - specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in chickens inoculated with a non - oncogenic vaccine strain of MDV, Immunology, 579, doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00211.x ; Witter (1983), Characteristics of Marek s disease viruses isolated from vaccinated commercial chicken flocks : association of viral pathotype with lymphoma frequency, Avian Dis, 113, doi.org/10.2307/1590377 ; Pejović (2007), Morphological and immunohistochemical examination of tumor cells in Marek s disease, Acta veterinaria Beograd, 57, 27, doi.org/10.2298/AVB0701027P ; Atkins (2013), Vaccination and reduced cohort duration can drive virulence evolution : Marek s disease virus and industrialized agriculture, Evolution, 851, doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01803.x ; Burgess (1999), A quantitative duplex PCR technique for measuring amounts of cell - associated Marek s disease virus : differences in two populations of lymphoma cells, J Virol Methods, 27, doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00075-0 ; Witter (1995), Characteristics of CVI Rispens two prototype vaccine strains of serotype Marek s disease virus, Avian Dis, 988. ; Osterrieder (2006), Marek s disease virus : from miasma to model, Nat Rev Microbiol, 283, doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1382 ; Zhang (2015), Pathogenic characteristics of Marek s disease virus field strains prevalent in China and the effectiveness of existing vaccines against them, Vet Microbiol, 62, doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.12.020 ; Dudnikova (2007), Evaluation of Marek s disease field isolates by the best fit pathotyping assay, Avian Pathol, 135, doi.org/10.1080/03079450701209857 ; Powell (1978), Marek s disease tumour - specific antigen induced by the herpesvirus of turkeys in vaccinated chickens, Vet Record, 232, doi.org/10.1136/vr.103.11.232 ; Haq (2013), Immunity to Marek s disease : where are we now, Dev Comp Immunol, 439, doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2013.04.001 ; Baaten (2004), Study of host - pathogen interactions to identify sustainable vaccine strategies to Marek s disease, Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 165, doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.04.009 ; Baigent (2006), Vaccinal control of Marek s disease : current challenges , and future strategies to maximize protection, Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 112, 78, doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.03.014 ; Mwangi (2011), Clonal structure of rapid - onset MDV - driven CD lymphomas and responding CD T cells, PLoS Pathog, 4, 1001337, doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001337 ; Hunt (2013), The influence of host genetics on Marek s disease virus evolution, Avian Dis, 474, doi.org/10.1637/10315-080212-Reg.1 ; Venugopal (2000), Marek s disease : an update on oncogenic mechanisms and control, Res Vet Sci, 17, doi.org/10.1053/rvsc.2000.0396 ; Kodama (1979), Anti - viral immunity against Marek s disease virus infected chicken kidney cells, Avian Pathol, 8, 33, doi.org/10.1080/03079457908418325 ; Heidari (2014), Marek s disease virus - induced transient cecal tonsil atrophy, Avian Dis, 262, doi.org/10.1637/10673-092013-Reg.1 ; Witter (2006), Susceptibility of adult chickens , with and without prior vaccination , to challenge with Marek s disease virus, Avian Dis, 354, doi.org/10.1637/7498-010306R.1 ; Davison (2005), Use of Marek s disease vaccines : could they be driving the virus to increasing virulence, Expert Rev Vaccines, 77, doi.org/10.1586/14760584.4.1.77
×