Details

PDF BIBTEX RIS

Title

Zamożność, wpływy, poważanie – społecznie cenione dobra oczami polskich wyborców

Journal title

Studia Socjologiczne

Yearbook

2021

Issue

No 3

Affiliation

Cześnik, Mikołaj : SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny ; Miśta, Rafał : SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny

Authors

Cześnik, Mikołaj ; Miśta, Rafał

Keywords

wybory ; stratyfikacja ; zachowania polityczne

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Coverage

57-88

Publisher

Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN ; Komitet Socjologii PAN ; Wydział Socjologii UW

Bibliography

  1. Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, Andrej Zaslove. 2014. How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 9: 1324–1353. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013512600.
  2. Akkerman, Tjitske. 2012. Comparing Radical Right Parties in Government: Immigration and Integration Policies in Nine Countries (1996–2010). West European Politics, 35, 3: 511–529. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2012.665738.
  3. Albertazzi, Daniele, Duncan McDonnell. 2005. The Lega Nord in the Second Berlusconi Government: In a League of its Own. West European Politics, 28, 5: 952-972. DOI: 10.1080/01402380500310600.
  4. Anduiza-Perea, Eva. 2002. Individual characteristics, institutional incentives and electoral abstention in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41: 643–673. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00025.
  5. Aslanidis, Paris, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2016. Dealing with Populists in Government: The SYRIZA-ANEL Coalition in Greece. Democratization, 23, 6: 1077–1091. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1154842.
  6. Barber, Bernard. 1978. Inequality and Occupational Prestige: Theory, Research, and Social Policy. Sociological Inquiry, 48: 75–88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1978. tb01012.x.
  7. Bendyk, Edwin. 2020. W Polsce, czyli wszędzie. Rzecz o upadku i przyszłości świata. Warszawa: Polityka.
  8. Blau, Peter, Otis D. Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.
  9. Boltanski, Luc, Arnaud Esquerre. 2016. The Economic Life of Things: Commodities, Collectibles, Assets. New Left Review, 98: 31–54.
  10. Bos, L. van der Brug W, de Vreese CH. 2013. An Experimental Test of the Impact of Style and Rhetoric on the Perception of Right-Wing Populist and Mainstream Party Leaders. Acta Politica, 48, 2: 192–208. DOI: 10.1057/ap.2012.27.
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In: J. G. Richardson, ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241–258.
  12. Brant, Rollin. 1990. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 4, 4: 1171–1178. DOI: 10.2307/2532457.
  13. Canovan, Margaret. 1999. Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47, 1: 2–16. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184.
  14. Cingano, Federico. 2014. Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic
  15. Growth. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 163. DOI: 10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en.
  16. Cowell, Frank, ed. 2004. Inequality, Welfare and Income Distribution: Experimental Approaches. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/s1049-2585(2004)11.
  17. Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 1: 139–167.
  18. Cześnik, Mikołaj, Rafał Miśta, Marta Żerkowska-Balas. 2020. Uczestnictwo i mobilizacja w wyborach parlamentarnych 2019 roku. Studia Socjologiczne 239, 4: 91–121. DOI:10.24425/sts.2020.135145.
  19. Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1959. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  20. Davis, Kingsley. 1949. Human society. New York: Macmillan.
  21. De Giorgi, Elisabetta, João Cancela. 2019. The Portuguese Radical Left Parties Supporting Government: From Policy-Takers to Policymakers? Government and Opposition, 56, 2: 281–300. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2019.25.
  22. de Lange, Sarah L. 2012. New Alliances: Why Mainstream Parties Govern with Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties. Political Studies, 60, 4: 899–918. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00947.x.
  23. Domański, Henryk. 1999. Prestiż. Wrocław: Fundacja Nauki Polskiej, Wydawnictwo Funna.
  24. Domański, Henryk, Zbigniew Sawiński. 1991. Wzory prestiżu a struktura społeczna. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
  25. Domański, Henryk, Zbigniew Sawiński, Kazimierz M. Słomczyński. 2007. Nowa klasyfikacja i skale zawodów. Socjologiczne wskaźniki pozycji społecznej w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
  26. Domański, Henryk, Bogdan W. Mach, Dariusz Przybysz. 2019. Otwartość polskiej struktury społecznej: 1982–2016. Studia Socjologiczne, 232, 1: 25–63. DOI: 10.24425/122489.
  27. Domhoff, William G. 1967. Who Rules America? Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  28. Dornbusch, Rudiger, Sebastian Edwards, eds. 2007. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226158488.001.0001.
  29. Dornbusch, Rudiger, Sebastian Edwards. 1990. Macroeconomic populism. Journal of Development Economics, 32, 2: 247–277. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(90)90038-D.
  30. Elchardus, Mark, Bram Spruyt. 2016. Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology. Government and Opposition, 51, 1: 111–133. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2014.27.
  31. Falkenbach, Michelle, Scott L. Greer. 2018. Political parties matter: the impact of the populist radical right on health. European Journal of Public Health, 28, 3: 15–18. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky157.
  32. Fox, John, Jangman Hong. 2009. Effect Displays in R for Multinomial and Proportional-Odds Logit Models: Extensions to the effects Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 32, 1: 1–24. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v032.i01.
  33. Gdula, Maciej. 2018. Nowy autorytaryzm. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
  34. Giddens, Anthony, Philip W. Sutton. 2014. Socjologia. Kluczowe pojęcia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  35. Goodwyn, Lawrence. 1991. Rethinking Populism: Paradoxes of Historiography and Democracy. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary, 88: 37–56. DOI: 10.3817/0691088037.
  36. Gornick, Janet C. Markus Jäntti, eds. 2013. Income Inequality: Economic Disparities and the Middle Class in Affluent Countries. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804778244.001.0001.
  37. Halamska, Maria. 2016. Struktura społeczno-zawodowa ludności wiejskiej w Polsce i jej przestrzenne zróżnicowanie. Wieś i Rolnictwo, 170, 1: 59–84. DOI: 10.7366/wir012016/04.
  38. Hameleers, M., Linda Bos, Claes H. de Vreese. 2016. ‘They Did It’: The Effects of Emotionalized Blame Attribution in Populist Communication. Communication Research, 44, 6: 870–900. DOI: 10.1177/0093650216644026.
  39. Hicks, Alexander M., Duane H. Swank. 1992. Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82. American Political Science Review, 86, 3: 658–674. DOI: 10.2307/1964129.
  40. Hoffmann, Eivind. 2003. International Classification of Status in Employment, ICSE-93. In: Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, Jürgen H. P., Christof Wolf, eds. Advances in Cross National Comparison. A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Variables. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
  41. International Labour Organisation (ILO). 2012. International Standard Classification of Occupations 2008 (ISCO-08): Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
  42. ISSP. 2009. Dataset: International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality IV. Cologne: GESIS. DOI: 10.4232/1.12777.
  43. Jarosz, Maria, ed. 2005. Wygrani i przegrani polskiej transformacji. Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN.
  44. Kelley, Jonathan, M. D. R. Evans. 1995. Class and class conflicts in six Western nations. American Sociological Review, 60, 2: 157–178. DOI: 10.2307/2096382.
  45. Kotwas, Marta, Jan Kubik. 2019. Symbolic Thickening of Public Culture and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Poland. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, 33, 2: 435–471. DOI: 10.1177/0888325419826691.
  46. Kraus, Michael W., Jun Won Park, Jacinth J. X. Tan. 2017. Signs of Social Class: The Experience of Economic Inequality in Everyday Life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 3: 422–435. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616673192.
  47. Kyle, Jordan, Limor Gultchin. 2018. Populists in Power Around the World. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3283962.
  48. Laclau, Ernesto. 2007. On Populist Reason. Verso.
  49. Lijphart, Arend. 1997. Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dillema. American Political Science Review, 91, 1: 1–14. DOI: 10.2307/2952255.
  50. Markowski, Radosław. 2019. Simplicism – a constitutive element of populism or separate phenomenon? Referat przedstawiony na 26th International Conference of Europeanists‚ Sovereignities in Contention: Nations, Regions and Citizens in Europe’, Madryt.
  51. Markowski, Radosław. 2020. Plurality support for democratic decay: the 2019 Polish parliamentary election. West European Politics, 43, 7: 1513–1525. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2020.1720171.
  52. Mejía, Jorge. 2018. Venezuela in Crisis: A Backgrounder. Colloquium: The Political Science Journal of Boston College, 2, 2: 42–53.
  53. Moffitt, Benjamin, Simon Tormey. 2014. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies, 62, 2: 381–397. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12032.
  54. Mudde, Cas. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39, 4: 541–563. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.
  55. Mudde, Cas. 2010. The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy. West European Politics, 33, 6: 1167–1186. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2010.508901.
  56. Ngamaba, Kayonda Hubert, Maria Panagioti, Christopher J. Armitage. 2018. Income inequality and subjective well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality of Life Research, 27, 3: 577–596. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1719-x.
  57. Nouzil, Ibrahim, Ali Raza, Salman Pervaiz. 2017. Social aspects of automation: Some critical insights. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 244: 012020. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/244/1/012020.
  58. Oddsson, Gudmundur A. 2010. Class awareness in Iceland. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30, 5/6: 292–312. DOI: 10.1108/01443331011054253.
  59. Pacek, Alexander, Benjamin Radcliff. 1995. Turnout and the Vote for Left-of-Centre Parties: A Cross-National Analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 25: 137–143. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400007109.
  60. Pakulski, Jan, Malcolm Waters. 1996. The Death of Class. London: Sage.
  61. Patel, Vikram et al. 2018. Income inequality and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and a scoping review of mechanisms. World Psychiatry, 17, 1: 76–89. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20492.
  62. Piketty, Thomas, Emmanuel Saez. 2003. Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1: 1–41. DOI: 10.1162/00335530360535135.
  63. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/9780674369542.
  64. Pirro, Andrea L. 2015. The Populist Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe: Ideology, Impact, and Electoral Performance. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315733159.
  65. Postman, Neil. 1992. Technopol. Triumf techniki nad kulturą. Warszawa: PIW.
  66. Rifkin, Jeremy. 1995. The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and The Dawn of The Post-market Era. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
  67. Rosenstone, Steven J., John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
  68. Sadura, Przemysław, Sławomir Sierakowski. 2019. Polityczny cynizm Polaków. Raport z badań socjologicznych. Warszawa: Krytyka Polityczna.
  69. Schneider, Simone M. 2016. Income Inequality and Subjective Wellbeing: Trends, Challenges, and Research Directions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17: 1719–1739. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-015-9655-3.
  70. Shils, Edward. 1968. Deference. In: John A. Jackson, ed. Social Stratification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 104–132.
  71. Skarżyńska, Krystyna. 2018. Psychologiczne i społeczne aspekty poparcia dla autorytarnej polityki. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 67, 2: 93–117. DOI: 10.26485/PS/2018/67.2/4.
  72. Stanley, Ben. 2008. The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 1: 95–110. DOI: 10.1080/13569310701822289.
  73. Stanley, Ben. 2011. Populism, nationalism, or national populism? An analysis of Slovak voting behaviour at the 2010 parliamentary election. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44, 4: 257–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.10.005.
  74. Stanley, Ben. 2018. A New Populist Divide? Correspondences of Supply and Demand in the 2015 Polish Parliamentary Elections. East European Politics and Societies, 33, 1: 17–43. DOI: 10.1177/0888325418783056.
  75. Stanley, Ben, Mikołaj Cześnik. 2019. Populism in Poland. In: D. Stockemer, ed. Populism Around the World. Cham: Springer, 67–87. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96758-5_5.
  76. Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2016. An anti-establishment backlash that shook up the party system? The October 2015 Polish parliamentary election. European Politics and Society, 18, 4: 404–427. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1256027.
  77. Sztompka, Piotr. 1996. Looking back: the year 1989 as a cultural and civilizational break. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 29: 115–129. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-067X(96)80001-8.
  78. Sztompka, Piotr. 2000. Trauma wielkiej zmiany. Społeczne koszty transformacji. Warszawa: ISP PAN.
  79. Szulc, Anna. 2016. Wakacje nad Bałtykiem? – Mamy najazd Hunów. Newsweek, 32/2016.
  80. Therborn, Göran. 2002. Class Perspectives: Shrink or Widen? Acta Sociologica, 45, 3: 221–225. DOI: 10.1177/000169930204500305.
  81. Therborn, Göran. 2013. The killing fields of inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  82. Treiman, Donald J. 1977. Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/C2013-0-11617-0.
  83. Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka, Waldemar Wojtasik. 2020. The Importance of Religiosity in the Formation of Populist Attitudes: the Case of Poland. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 19, 55: 34–52.
  84. Van Hauwaert, Steven M., Stijn Van Kessel. 2018. Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57, 1: 68–92. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12216.
  85. Weyland, Kurt. 2001. Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34, 1: 1–22. DOI: 10.2307/422412.
  86. Woźniak, Wojciech. 2020. Polarization and the political agenda: income inequalities in political parties’ manifestos in Poland. Contemporary Politics, 26, 1: 84–105. DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2019.1653530.
  87. Wright, Erik O. 1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511488917.
  88. Wright, Erik O., Luca Perrone. 1977. Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality. American Sociological Review, 42, 1: 32–55. DOI: 10.2307/2117730.
  89. Yee, Thomas W. 2010. The VGAM Package for Categorical Data Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 32, 10: 1–34. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v032.i10.
  90. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2015. Situated Intersectionality and Social Inequality. Raisons politiques, 58, 2: 91–100. DOI: 10.3917/rai.058.0091.
  91. Zielińska, Maria, Tomasz Kołodziej. 2014. Pozycja stratyfikacyjna jednostki a subiektywna ocena położenia społecznego. Przyczynek do analizy stopnia zgodności skal pomiarowych. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 63, 2: 73–91.

Date

2021.09.28

Type

Artykuły / Articles

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/sts.2021.138475
×