Details
Title
Contemporary tendencies in creating public spaces in BudapestJournal title
Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury Oddziału Polskiej Akademii Nauk w KrakowieYearbook
2021Volume
vol. XLIXAuthors
Affiliation
Sykta, Izabela : Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Chair of Landscape ArchitectureKeywords
landscape architecture ; Budapest ; cultural landscape ; biophilic design ; public space ; strategy of place-making ; urban synergyDivisions of PAS
Nauki TechniczneCoverage
359-382Publisher
Polsh Academy of Sciences, Branch in Kraków (Polska Akademia Nauk Oddział w Krakowie)Bibliography
Bell, P.A. et al. (1990), Environmental Psychology, Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Böhm, A. (1981), O budowie i synergii wnętrz urbanistycznych, Kraków: Politechnika Krakowska.
Budapeszt. Mini przewodnik (2012), Kraków: Wydawnictwo Bezdroża.
Budapest: Stadtfuhrer und Atlas (1988/1989), Budapest: Cartographia.
Buty na brzegu Dunaju, [online] https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buty_na_brzegu_Dunaju, (dostępne: 7.03.2018).
Dömök, B.G. (2014), A Majestic Ornament, [online] http://budnews.hu/news/news/62/a-majestic-ornament, (accessed: 10.09.2016).
Engels téri MÁVAUT pályaudvar — Design Terminal (2012), [online] http://egykor.hu/budapest-v--kerulet/engels-teri-mavaut-palyaudvar---design-terminal/3335, (accessed: 15.10.2016).
Erzsébet Square Identity. Identity design and wayfinding system for Erzsébet Square. Hidden Characters (2014), [online] https://www.behance.net/gallery/17195165/Erzsebet-Square-Identity, (accessed: 17.10.2016).
Granasztói, P. (1975), Budapeszt — krajobraz i architektura, Warszawa: Arkady.
Grzybowski, M., Sykta, I. (2017) ‘Współczesne tendencje w kształtowaniu przestrzeni publicznych i terenów zieleni na przykładzie Budapesztu’ / ‘Contemporary tendencies in creating public spaces and urban greenery in Budapest’ [w: ] XX Forum Architektury Krajobrazu. Praktyka zawodowa — badania naukowe — dydaktyka. Streszczenia / XX Forum of Landscape Architecture. Professional practice — research — didactics. Abstracts, Kraków: Instytut Architektury Krajobrazu, Politechnika Krakowska, s. 56.
Hou, J. (2013), ‘Your place and/or My Place’ [in:] Hou, J. (ed.) Trancultural Cities: Border, Crossing and Placemaking, New York: Routledge, pp. 1–16.
Kossuth Tér Rekonstrukció — Országház Látogatóközpont, Országgyűlési Múzeum És Mélygarázs (2014), [online] http://www.kozti.hu/index.php/2014/09/08/kossuth-ter-rekonstrukcio-orszaghaz-latogatokozpont-orszaggyulesi-muzeum-es-melygarazs/, (accessed: 20.08.2016).
Kovács, D. (2015), Budapest Art Déco, Budapest: ANGOL.
Krčmářová, J. ‘E.O. Wilson’s concept of biophilia and the environmental movement in the USA’, Klaudyán: Internet Journal of Historical Geography and Environmental History, Volume 6/2009, No. 1-2, pp. 4–17, [online] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303961317_EO_Wilson’s_concept_of_biophilia_and_the_environmental_movement_in_the_USA, (accessed: 12.05.2021).
Lasiewicz-Sych, A. ‘Strategia tworzenia miejsc — szkic o architekturze Seattle’ / ‘Strategy of Pleacemaking — an Essay on Seattle Architecture’, Czasopismo Techniczne. Architektura, T. VII, z. 3-A (3)/2015(112), s. 97–125.
Lasiewicz-Sych, A. ‘Wpływ otoczenia na aktywną percepcję budynków — studium przypadku’ / ‘Impact of surroundings on the buildings’ active perception — case study’, Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury / Urbanity and Architecture Files, Kraków: Oddział PAN w Krakowie, T. XLVIII/2020. s. 161–178. Mała encyklopedia prakseologii i teorii organizacji (1978), Warszawa: PWN.
Mehaffy, M., Salingaros, N. (2013), ‘Biophilia: Our Evolved Kinship To Biological Forms’ [in:] Salingaros, N. (ed.) Unified Architectural Theory: Form, Language, Complexity, Katmandu, Nepal: Vajra Books, pp. 99–105.
Report of the World Heritage Committee. Eleventh session, (Unesco Headqarters, 7–11 December 1987) (1988), [online] https://whc.unesco.org/archive/repcom87.htm, (accessed: 05.05.2021).
Roe, M., Taylor, K. (2014), ‘New Cultural Landscapes. Emerging Issues, Context and Themes’, [in:] Roe, M., Taylor, K. (eds.) New Cultural Landscapes, New York: Routledge, pp.1–23.
Rygiel, P. ‘Odporność wizualna krajobrazu — zastosowanie w planowaniu przestrzennym’ / ‘Landscape visual sensitivity — its use in spatial planning’, Czasopismo Techniczne. Architektura, R. 104, z. 5-A (2007), s. 257–258.
Stępień, P.M. ‘Zamki i pałace Budapesztu’, Renowacje i zabytki, 4(12)2004, s. 80–100.
Sykta, I. ‘Synergia terenów wystaw światowych i struktur przestrzennych miast-gospodarzy’ / ‘Synergy of world’s exhibitions areas and spatial structures of host cities’, Budownictwo i Architektura, vol. 16(2) (2017), s. 5–30.
Szilagyi, K., Demjén, I. (2007), ‘Hungary. The Garden of Somogy, Bonnya. Erzsebet Square, Budapest’ [in:] Thompson, I., Dam, T., Nielsen, J.B. (eds.) European Landscape Architecture: Best Practice in Detailing, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 119–152.
Taylor, M.N. (2014), Struggles in and over Public Space: Hungarian Heritage as a Homeless Free Zone, [online] http://critcom.councilforeuropeanstudies.org/struggles-in-and-over-public-space-hungarian-heritage-as-homeless-free-zone/, (accessed: 21.08.2016).
Ulrich, R.S. (1986), ‘Human responses to vegetation and landscapes’, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 13/1986, pp. 29–44.
Várkert Bazár (2014), [online] http://www.kozti.hu/index.php/2014/09/06/varkert-bazar/, (accessed: 20.08.2016).
Welsch, W. (2002), ‘Przestrzenie dla ludzi’ / ‘Spaces for Humans’ [w:] Budak, A. (red.), Co to jest architektura? / What is Architecture?, Kraków: Bunkier Sztuki, s. 161–195.
Wesołowski, J. ‘Budapeszt — Paryż i Wiedeń Wschodu. Zarys rozwoju urbanistycznego’, Renowacje i zabytki, 4(12)2004, s. 12–52.
Wilson, E.O. (1984), Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species, Cambridge, MA-London: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, E.O. (1993), ‘Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic’ [in:] Kellert, S., Wilson. E.O. (eds.) The Biophilia Hypothesis, Washington, D.C.: Shearwater Books, pp. 31–40.
Żórawski, J. (1973), O budowie formy architektonicznej, Warszawa: Arkady.
Date
2022.02.03Type
Artykuły / ArticlesIdentifier
DOI: 10.24425/tkuia.2021.138722Aims and scope
Aims and scopes
TEKA publishes articles on many aspects of urban planning, urban design, spatial planning, architecture design, theory of urbanism and architecture, landscape architecture, conservation of history monuments and relative topics.
Topics covered include: urban desing, revital design and housing, adaptation to climate change; development and planning issues; urban management; urban regeneration; urban theory; landscape design, landscape planning, livability and quality of life; greening; creating sustainable cities; sustainable development, architectural design, architectural and urban composition, history of urban desing and architecture, conservation of history monuments, history of garden art, garden art.
Language and Ethics
Manuscripts must be prepared with attention to the basic standards of professional communication. Papers with numerous mistakes, in language, grammar, layout or notation, will be returned to the author without review (see the princyples of manuscript preparation). Any evidence of plagiarism or serial publication of similar manuscripts will result in the immediate termination of the review process.
Manuscript Length
Manuscripts should not exceed 70 000 characters for both langage versions and 35 000 characters just for English version. However, somewhat longer papers may be considered in justified cases – decision due to Editorial Board. Authors are encouraged to contact the editors to discuss it.
Review and Timelines
All manuscripts are screened by the editors; many are returned as unsuitable for review as they do not conform to the preferences discussed above or do not meet editoril requirements.
Papers that are considered for review are sent to qualified reviewers throughout the world; authors are encouraged to suggest expert reviewers for editorial consideration.
The deadline for annual submision is end of March each year. The editors strive to provide an initial response [reject or revise] to all authors within six to eight weeks. Most successfully revised papers are available for download within 9 months of submission (end of each year).
Guidelines updated December 2024
Profesor dr hab. inż. arch. Agata Zachariasz, Editor-in-Chief