Details
Title
Storage-dependent changes in sperm motility, membrane integrity and morphology following preservation of Duroc boar semenJournal title
Polish Journal of Veterinary SciencesYearbook
2025Volume
vol. 28Issue
No 4Authors
Affiliation
Wysokińska, A.; Wójcik, E. : Institute of Animal Science and Fisheries, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Siedlce, Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland ; Dziekońska, A. : Department of Animal Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn, PolandKeywords
boar ; motility ; morphology ; semen quality ; semen storage timeDivisions of PAS
Nauki Biologiczne i RolniczeCoverage
519–528Publisher
Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Veterinary Sciences ; University of Warmia and Mazury in OlsztynBibliography
Aitken RJ, Sutton M, Warner P, Richarson DW (1985) Relationship between the movement characteristics of human spermatozoa and their ability to penetrate cervical mucus and zona-free hamster oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 73: 441-449.
Althouse GC, Wilson ME, Kuster C, Parsley M (1998) Characterization of lower temperature storage limitations of fresh-extended porcine semen. Theriogenology 50: 535-543.
Amann RP, Waberski D (2014) Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments. Theriogenology 81: 5-17.
Barquero V, Roldan ER, Soler C, Yániz JI, Camacho M, Valverde A (2021) Predictive capacity of boar sperm morphometry and morphometric subpopulations on reproductive success after artificial insemination. Animals (Basel) 11: 920.
Blom E (1981) The morphological estimation of the spermatozoa defects of bull II. The proposal of new classification of spermatozoa defects. Med Weter 37: 239-242.
Caldeira C, Hernández-Ibánez S, Valverde A, Martin P, Herranz-Jusdado JG, Gallego V, Asturiano JF, Dzyuba B, Pšenička M, Soler C (2019) Standardization of sperm motility analysis by using CASA-Mot for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii). Aquaculture 502: 223-231.
Casey PJ, Gravance CG, Davis RO, Chabot DD, Liu IK (1997) Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions. Theriogenology 47: 575-582.
Dziekońska A, Fraser L, Strzeżek J (2009) Effect of different storage temperatures on the metabolic activity of spermatozoa following liquid storage of boar semen. J Anim Feed Sci 18: 638-649.
Dziekońska A, Fraser L, Majewska A, Lecewicz M, Zasiadczyk Ł, Kordan W (2013) Effect of commercial long-term extenders on metabolic activity and membrane integrity of boar spermatozoa stored at 17 degrees C. Pol J Vet Sci 16: 517-525.
Dziekońska A, Strzeżek J (2011) Boar variability affects sperm metabolism activity in liquid stored semen at 5 degrees C. Pol J Vet Sci 14: 21-27.
Flowers WL, Deller F, Stewart KR (2016) Use of heterospermic inseminations and paternity testing to evaluate the relative contributions of common sperm traits and seminal plasma proteins in boar fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 174: 123-131.
Fraser L, Gorszczaruk K, Strzeżek J (2001) Relationship between motility and membrane integrity of boar spermatozoa in media varying in osmolality. Reprod Domest Anim 36: 325-329.
Gacem S, Catalán J, Yánez-Ortiz I, Soler C, Miró J (2021) New Sperm Morphology Analysis in Equids: Trumorph® Vs Eosin-Nigrosin Stain. Vet Sci 8: 79.
Garcia-Vazquez FA, Gadea J, Matas C, Holt WV (2016) Importance of sperm morphology during sperm transport and fertilization in mammals. Asian J Androl 18: 844-850.
Gogol P, Szczęśniak-Fabiańczyk B, Wierzchoś-Hilczer A (2009) The photon emission, ATP level and motility of boar spermatozoa during liquid storage. Reprod Biol 9: 39-49.
Gomendio M, Roldan ER (1991) Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc Biol Sci 243: 181-185.
Hafemeister T, Schulze P, Bortfeldt R, Simmet C, Jung M, Fuchs-Kittowski F, Schulze M (2022) Boar Semen Shipping for Artificial Insemination: Current Status and Analysis of Transport Conditions with a Major Focus on Vibration Emissions. Animals (Basel) 12: 1331.
Hidalgo M, Rodríguez I, Dorado J, Soler C (2008) Morphometric classification of Spanish thoroughbred stallion sperm heads. Anim Reprod Sci 103: 374-378.
Hirai M, Boersma A, Hoeflich A, Wolf E, Foll J, Aumüller TR, Braun J (2001) Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J Androl 22: 104-110.
Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P, Maxwell WM (2000) Storage of boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci 62: 143-172.
Katiyar R, Chakravarty H, Deori S, Singh M, Abedin S, Rautela R, Khargharia G, Mishra VK (2024) Oxyrase-Mediated Improvement in the Quality and Fertility of Crossbred Boar Spermatozoa During Liquid Storage. Reprod Domest Anim 59: e14735.
Katiyar R, Ghosh SK, Karikalan M, Kumar A, Pande M, Gemeda AI, Rautela R, Dhara SK, Bhure SK, Srivastava N, Patra MK, Chandra V, Devi HL, Singh M. (2022) An Evidence of Humanin-Like Peptide and Humanin Mediated Cryosurvival of Spermatozoa in Buffalo Bulls. Theriogenology 194: 13-26.
Keller A, Kerns K (2023) Sperm capacitation as a predictor of boar fertility. Mol Reprod Dev 90: 594-600.
Kerns K, Jankovitz J, Robinson J, Minton A, Kuster C, Sutovsky P (2020) Relationship between the length of sperm tail mitochondrial sheath and fertility traits in boars used for artificial insemination. Antioxidants (Basel) 9: 1033.
Knox RV (2016) Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology 85: 83-93.
Kondracki S, Iwanina M, Wysokińska A, Huszno M (2012) Comparative analysis of Duroc and Pietrain boar sperm morphology. Acta Vet Brno 81: 195-199.
Li X, Wang L, Li Y, Zhao N, Zhen L, Fu J, Yang Q (2016) Calcium regulates motility and protein phosphorylation by changing cAMP and ATP concentrations in boar sperm in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci 172: 39-51.
Lopez Rodriguez A, Van Soom A, Arsenakis I, Maes D (2017) Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Manag 3: 15.
Luo SM, Schatten H, Sun QY (2013) Sperm mitochondria in reproduction: good or bad and where do they go? J Genet Genomics 40: 549-556.
Luther I, Maree L, Kotze A, Hildebrandt T, Göritz F, Hermes R, Van der Horst G (2020) Sperm motility, kinematics, morphometry and morphology over two seasons in free-ranging African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Reprod Fertil Dev 32: 425-438.
Malo AF, Gomendio M, Garde J, Lang-Lenton B, Soler AJ, Roldan ERS (2006) Sperm design and sperm function. Biol Lett 2: 246-249.
Maroto-Morales A, Garcia-Alvarez O, Ramon M, Martinez-Pastor F, Fernandez-Santos MR, Soler AJ, Garde JJ (2016) Current status and potential of morphometric sperm analysis. Asian J Androl 18: 863-870.
Maside C, Recuero S, Salas-Huetos A, Ribas-Maynou J, Yeste M (2023) Animal board invited review: an update on the methods for semen quality evaluation in swine – from farm to the lab. Animal 17: 100720.
Maxwell WM, Johnson LA (1999) Physiology of spermatozoa at high dilution rates: the influence of seminal plasma. Theriogenology 52: 1353-1362.
Morrell JM (2016) Antimicrobials in boar semen extenders – a risk/benefit analysis. J Antimicro 2: 107.
Muvhali PT, Bonato M, Malecki IA, Cloete SW (2022) Mass Sperm Motility Is Correlated to Sperm Motility as Measured by Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis (CASA) Technology in Farmed Ostriches. Animals (Basel) 12: 1104.
Ostermeier GC, Sargeant GA, Yandell BS, Evenson DP, Parrish JJ (2001) Relationship of bull fertility to sperm nuclear shape. J Androl 22: 595-603.
Petrunkina AM, Volker G, Weitze KF, Beyerbach M, Topfer-Petersen E, Waberski D (2005) Detection of cooling-induced membrane changes in the response of boar sperm to capacitating conditions. Theriogenology 63: 2278-2299.
Popwell JM, Flowers WL (2004) Variability in relationships between semen quality and estimates of in vivo and in vitro fertility in boars. Anim Reprod Sci 81: 97-113.
Prieto-Martinez N, Bussalleu E, Garcia-Bonavila E, Bonet S, Yeste M (2014) Effects of Enterobacter cloacae on boar sperm quality during liquid storage at 17°C. Anim Reprod Sci 148: 72-82.
Quintero-Moreno A, Rigau T, Rodriguez-Gil JE (2004) Regression analyses and motile sperm subpopulation structure study as improving tools in boar semen quality analysis. Theriogenology 61: 673-690.
Saravia F, Núnez-Martínez I, Morán JM, Soler C, Muriel A, Rodríguez-Martínez H, Pena FJ (2007) Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. Theriogenology 68: 196-203.
Schulze M, Ammon C, Schaefer J, Luther AM, Jung M, Waberski D (2017) Impact of different dilution techniques on boar sperm quality and sperm distribution of the extended ejaculate. Anim Reprod Sci 182: 138-145.
Schulze M, Kuster C, Schäfer J, Jung M, Grossfeld R (2018) Effect of production management on semen quality during longterm storage in different European boar studs. Anim Reprod Sci 190: 94-101.
Schulze M, Rüdiger K, Waberski D (2015) Rotation of boar semen doses during storage affects sperm quality. Reprod Domest Anim 50: 684-687.
Smital J, De Sousa LL, Mohsen A (2004) Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output. Anim Reprod Sci 80: 121-130.
Thurston LM, Watson PE, Mileham AJ, Holt WV (2001) Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J Androl 22: 382-394.
Tremoen NH, Gaustad AH, Andersen-Ranberg I, van Son M, Zeremichael TT, Frydenlund K, Grindflek E, Vage DI, Myromslien FD (2018) Relationship between sperm motility characteristics and ATP concentrations, and association with fertility in two different pig breeds. Anim Reprod Sci 193: 226-234.
Trzcińska M, Bryła M (2022) Assessment of high hydrostatic pressure for the cryopreservation procedure of boar semen with low initial sperm motility. Anim Sci Pap Rep 40(2): 159-170.
Trzcińska M, Bryła M, Smorąg Z (2011) Apoptotic-like changes in the spermatozoa of fresh and stored boar semen and the quality of embryos produced in vivo. Anim Reprod Sci 124: 90-97.
van der Horst G, Maree L (2009) SpermBlue: a new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis. Biotech Histochem 84: 299-308.
van der Horst G, Maree L, du Plessis SS (2018) Current perspectives of CASA applications in diverse mammalian spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev 30: 875-888.
Wiebke M, Hensel B, Nitsche-Melkus E, Jung M, Schulze M (2022) Cooled storage of semen from livestock animals (part I): boar, bull, and stallion. Anim Reprod Sci 246: 106822.
Wysokińska A (2020) Effect of sperm concentration on boar spermatozoa mitochondrial membrane potential and motility in semen stored at 17 °C. Acta Vet Brno 89: 333-340.
Wysokińska A, Kondracki S (2019) Heterosis for morphometric characteristics of sperm cells from Duroc x Pietrain crossbred boars. Anim Reprod Sci 211: 106217.
Wysokińska A, Szablicka D (2021) Integrity of Sperm Cell Membrane in the Semen of Crossbred and Purebred Boars during Storage at 17 °C: Heterosis Effects. Animals (Basel) 11: 3373.
Wysokińska A, Szablicka D, Dziekońska A, Wójcik E (2023) Analysis of changes in the morphological structures of sperm during preservation of liquid boar semen in two different seasons of the year. Anim Reprod Sci 256: 107297.
Yániz JL, Silvestre MA, Santolaria P, Soler C (2018) CASA-Mot in mammals: an update. Reprod Fertil Dev 30: 799-809.
Yániz JL, Soler C, Santolaria P (2015) Computer assisted sperm morphometry in mammals: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 156: 1-12.
Yeste M (2017) State-of-the-art of boar sperm preservation in liquid and frozen state. Anim Reprod 14: 69-81.
Yeste M, Briz M, Pinart E, Sancho S, Bussalleu E, Bonet S (2010) The osmotic tolerance of boar spermatozoa and its usefulness as sperm quality parameter. Anim Reprod Sci 119: 265-274.