Wyniki wyszukiwania

Filtruj wyniki

  • Czasopisma
  • Autorzy
  • Słowa kluczowe
  • Data
  • Typ

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyników: 2
Wyników na stronie: 25 50 75
Sortuj wg:

Abstrakt

B a c k g r o u n d: During COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to collect and analyze data concerning management of hospitals and wards to work out solutions for potential future crisis. The objective of the study was to investigate how surgical wards in Poland are managing during rapid development of the COVID-19 pandemic.
M e t h o d s: An anonymous, online survey was designed and distributed to surgeons and surgery residents working in surgical departments during pandemic. Responders were divided into two groups: Group 1 (responders working in a “COVID-19-dedicated” hospital) and Group 2 (responders working in other hospitals).
R e s u l t s: Overall, 323 responders were included in the study group, 30.03% of which were female. Medical staff deficits were reported by 21.15% responders from Group 1 and 29.52% responders from Group 2 (p = 0.003). The mean number of elective surgeries performed weekly prior to the pandemic in Group 1 was 40.37 ± 46.31 and during the pandemic was 13.98 ± 37.49 (p <0.001). In Group 2, the mean number of elective surgeries performed weekly before the start of the pandemic was 26.85 ± 23.52 and after the start of the pandemic, it was 7.65 ± 13.49 (p <0.001). There were significantly higher reported levels of preparedness in Group 1 in terms of: theoretical training of the staff, equipping the staff and adapting the operating theater to safely perform procedures on patients with COVID-19. Overall, 62.23% of responders presume being infected with SARS-CoV-2.
C o n c l u s i o n s: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a significantly negative impact on surgical wards. Despite the preparations, the number of responders who presume being infected with SARS-CoV-2 during present crisis is high.


Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Tomasz Stefura
1
Justyna Rymarowicz
1
Michał Wysocki
1
Jacek Szeliga
2
Grzegorz Wallner
3
Michał Pędziwiatr
1
Michał Nowakowski
1
Piotr Major
1

  1. 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
  2. Department of General, Gastroenterological, and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
  3. 2nd Department of General, Gastrointestinal and Oncological Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

Abstrakt

Autorka analizuje problem choroby, umierania i śmierci podjęty w sztuce Margaret Edson Dowcip (Wit). Zwraca uwagę na konstrukcję metateatru i rolę dowcipu w sztuce. Następnie analizuje ograniczenia rozumu w podejściu opiekujących się Vivian Bearing lekarzy, skoncentrowanych na poddaniu jej morderczemu eksperymentowi i – w konsekwencji – na potencjalnym sukcesie badawczym. Autorka analizuje stosunek głównej bohaterki do utworów literackich oraz do jej własnej choroby, do innych ludzi i do Boga. Zastanawia się nad tym, co jest utratą w jej myśleniu o swoim cierpieniu. Następnie analizuje podejście pielęgniarki, która dzięki swej inteligencji emocjonalnej i empatii towarzyszy Vivian w drodze do śmierci.

Przejdź do artykułu

Autorzy i Afiliacje

Anna Głąb
ORCID: ORCID

Ta strona wykorzystuje pliki 'cookies'. Więcej informacji