Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 38
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Recording of krill swarms and the observations of the state of the sea and the force of wind were conducted on the M/T "Gemini" from 6 to 26 February, 1978, eastwards of the South Orkneys Archipelago. It has been found that a heavy sea and strong winds disperse krill swarms. At night krill swarms occur much more frequently than during the day.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Moczydłowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In manufacturing industries, the selection of machine parameters is a very complicated task in a time-bound manner. The process parameters play a primary role in confirming the quality, low cost of manufacturing, high productivity, and provide the source for sustainable machining. This paper explores the milling behavior of MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposites to attain the parametric conditions having lower surface roughness (Ra) and higher materials removal rate (MRR). Milling is considered as an indispensable process employed to acquire highly accurate and precise slots. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is very trendy among the nature-stimulated metaheuristic method used for the optimization of varying constraints. This article uses the non-dominated PSO algorithm to optimize the milling parameters, namely, MWCNT weight% (Wt.), spindle speed (N), feed rate (F), and depth of cut (D). The first setting confirmatory test demonstrates the value of Ra and MRR that are found as 1:62 μm and 5.69 mm3/min, respectively and for the second set, the obtained values of Ra and MRR are 3.74 μm and 22.83 mm3/min respectively. The Pareto set allows the manufacturer to determine the optimal setting depending on their application need. The outcomes of the proposed algorithm offer new criteria to control the milling parameters for high efficiency.

Go to article

Bibliography

[1] M. Liu, H. Younes, H. Hong, and G.P. Peterson. Polymer nanocomposites with improved mechanical and thermal properties by magnetically aligned carbon nanotubes. Polymer, 166:81–87, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.031.
[2] S.K. Singh and V.K. Verma. Exact solution of flow in a composite porous channel. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 67(1):97–110, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ame.2020.131685.
[3] N. Pundhir, S. Zafar, and H. Pathak. Performance evaluation of HDPE/MWCNT and HDPE/kenaf composites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2019. doi: 10.1177/0892705719868278.
[4] N. Muralidhar, V. Kaliveeran, V. Arumugam, and I.S. Reddy. Dynamic mechanical characterization of epoxy composite reinforced with areca nut husk fiber. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 67(1):57–72, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ame.2020.131683.
[5] F. Mostaani, M.R. Moghbeli, and H. Karimian. Electrical conductivity, aging behavior, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding properties of polyaniline/MWCNT nanocomposites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 31(10):1393–1415, 2018. doi: 10.1177/0892705717738294.
[6] M.R. Sanjay, P. Madhu, M. Jawaid, P. Senthamaraikannan, S. Senthil, and S. Pradeep. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172:566–581, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101.
[7] A.J. Valdani and A. Adamian. Finite element-finite volume simulation of underwater explosion and its impact on a reinforced steel plate. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 67(1):5–30, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ame.2020.131681.
[8] A. Kausar, I. Rafique, and B. Muhammad. Review of applications of polymer/carbon nanotubes and epoxy/CNT composites. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 55(11):1167–1191, 2016. doi: 10.1080/03602559.2016.1163588.
[9] E. Vajaiac, et al. Mechanical properties of multiwall carbon nanotube-epoxy composites. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, 10(2):359–369, 2015.
[10] A.E Douba, M. Emiroglu, R.A Tarefder, U.F Kandil, and M.R. Taha. Use of carbon nanotubes to improve fracture toughness of polymer concrete. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2612(1):96–103, 2017. doi: 10.3141/2612-11.
[11] W. Khan, R. Sharma, and P. Saini. Carbon nanotube-based polymer composites: synthesis, properties and applications. In M.R. Berber and I.H. Hafez (eds.). Carbon Nanotubes. Current Progress and their Polymer Composites. chapter 1, pages 1-46. IntechOpen, Rijeka, Croatia, 2016. doi: 10.5772/62497.
[12] W.M. da Silva, H. Ribeiro, J.C. Neves, A.R. Sousa, and G.G. Silva. Improved impact strength of epoxy by the addition of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes and reactive diluent. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 132(39):1–12, 2015, doi: 10.1002/app.42587.
[13] S. Dixit, A. Mahata, D.R. Mahapatra, S.V. Kailas, and K. Chattopadhyay. Multi-layer graphene reinforced aluminum – Manufacturing of high strength composite by friction stir alloying. Composites Part B: Engineering,136: 63–71, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.028.
[14] C. Kostagiannakopoulou, X. Tsilimigkra, G. Sotiriadis, and V. Kostopoulos. Synergy effect of carbon nano-fillers on the fracture toughness of structural composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 129:18–25, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.012.
[15] G. Romhány and G. Szebényi. Preparation of MWCNT reinforced epoxy nanocomposite and examination of its mechanical properties. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 37(5-6):214–218, 2008. doi: 10.1179/174328908X309376.
[16] G. Mittal, V. Dhand, K.Y. Rhee, S.J. Park, and W.R. Lee. A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 21:11–25, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022.
[17] S. H. Behzad, M.J. Kimya, G. Mehrnaz. Mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy polysulfide nanocomposite. Journal of Materials & Design, 50:62–67, 2013.
[18] N. Yu, Z.H. Zhang, and S.Y. He. Fracture toughness and fatigue life of MWCNT/epoxy composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 494(1-2):380:384, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.04.051.
[19] J.G. Park, et al. Thermal conductivity of MWCNT/epoxy composites: The effects of length, alignment and functionalization. Carbon, 50(6):2083–2090, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.046.
[20] B. Singaravel and T. Selvaraj. Optimization of machining parameters in turning operation using combined TOPSIS and AHP method. Tehnički Vjesnik, 22 (6):1475–1480, 2015. doi: 10.17559/TV-20140530140610.
[21] N. Kaushik and S. Singhal. Hybrid combination of Taguchi-GRA-PCA for optimization of wear behavior in AA6063/SiC p matrix composite. Production & Manufacturing Research, 6(1):171–189, 2018. doi: 10.1080/21693277.2018.1479666.
[22] S.O.N. Raj and S. Prabhu. Analysis of multi objective optimisation using TOPSIS method in EDM process with CNT infused copper electrode. International Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 19(1):76–94, 2017. doi: 10.1504/IJMMM.2017.081190.
[23] S. Chakraborty. Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9-12):1155–1166, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2972-0.
[24] M.P. Jenarthanan and R. Jeyapaul. Optimisation of machining parameters on milling of GFRP composites by desirability function analysis using Taguchi method. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 5(4):23–36, 2013. doi: 10.4314/ijest.v5i4.3.
[25] T.V. Sibalija. Particle swarm optimisation in designing parameters of manufacturing processes: A review (2008–2018). Applied Soft Computing, 84:105743, ISSN 1568-4946, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105743.
[26] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the ICNN'95 – International Conference on Neural Networks, pages 1942–1948, Perth, Australia, 27 Nov.–1 Dec. 1995. doi: 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968.
[27] F. Cus and J. Balic. Optimization of cutting process by GA approach. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(1-2):113–121, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00068-6.
[28] M.N. Ab Wahab, S. Nefti-Meziani, and A. Atyabi. A comprehensive review of swarm optimization algorithms. PLoS One, 10(5): e0122827, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122827.
[29] A. Del Prete, R. Franchi, and D. De Lorenzis. Optimization of turning process through the analytic flank wear modelling. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1960:070008, 2018.doi: 10.1063/1.5034904.
[30] G. Xu and Z. Yang. Multiobjective optimization of process parameters for plastic injection molding via soft computing and grey correlation analysis. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 78(1–4):525–536, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6643-4.
[31] H. Juan, S.F. Yu, and B.Y. Lee. The optimal cutting parameter selection of production cost in HSM for SKD61 tool steels. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 43 (7):679–686, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00038-5.
[32] U. Zuperl and F. Cus. Optimization of cutting conditions during cutting by using neural networks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(1-2):189–199, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00079-0.
[33] P.E. Amiolemhen and A.O.A. Ibhadode. Application of genetic algorithms – determination of the optimal machining parameters in the conversion of a cylindrical bar stock into a continuous finished profile. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44(12-13):1403–1412, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.02.001.
[34] E.O. Ezugwu, D.A. Fadare, J. Bonney, R.B. Da Silva, and W.F. Sales. Modeling the correlation between cutting and process parameters in high-speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy using an artificial neural network. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 45(12-13):1375–1385, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.02.004.
[35] P. Asokan, N. Baskar, K. Babu, G. Prabhakaran, and R. Saravanan. Optimization of surface grinding operation using particle swarm optimization technique. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 127(4):885–892, 2015. doi: 10.1115/1.2037085.
[36] R.Q. Sardinas, M.R. Santana, and E.A. Brindis. Genetic algorithm-based multio-bjective optimization of cutting parameters in turning processes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 19(2):127–133, 2006. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2005.06.007.
[37] C. Jia and H. Zhu. An improved multiobjective particle swarm optimization based on culture algorithms. Algorithms, 10(2):46–56, 2017. doi: 10.3390/a10020046.
[38] C.A. Coello Coello, G.T. Pulido, and M.S. Lechuga. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8(3):256–279, 2004. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067.
[39] C.R. Raquel and P.C. Naval. An effective use of crowding distance in multiobjective particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pages 257–264, Washington DC, USA, 2005. doi: 10.1145/1068009.1068047.
[40] G.T. Pulido and C.A. Coello Coello. Using clustering techniques to improve the performance of a multi-objective particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), pages 225-237, Seattle, USA, 2004. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24854-5_20.
[41] S. Mostaghim and J. Teich. Strategies for finding good local guides in multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium (SIS'03), pages 26–33, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 26 April 2003. doi: 10.1109/SIS.2003.1202243.
[42] J. Branke and S. Mostaghim. About selecting the personal best in multi-objective particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving From Nature (PPSN Ix) International Conference, pages 523–532, Reykjavik, Iceland, 9–13 September 2006. doi: 10.1007/11844297_53.
[43] T.M. Chenthil Jegan and D. Ravindran. Electrochemical machining process parameter optimization using particle swarm optimization. Computational Intelligence, 33:1019–1037, 2017. doi: 10.1111/coin.12139.
[44] C.P. Mohanty, S.S. Mahapatra, and M.R. Singh. A particle swarm approach for multi-objective optimization of electrical discharge machining process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27:1171–1190, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-0942-3.
[45] U. Natarajan, V.M. Periasamy, and R. Saravanan. Application of particle swarm optimisation in artificial neural network for the prediction of tool life. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 31:871–876, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s00170-005-0252-1.
[46] A.K. Gandhi, S.K. Kumar, M.K. Pandey, and M.K. Tiwari. EMPSO-based optimization for inter-temporal multi-product revenue management under salvage consideration. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1):468–476, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.12.006.
[47] J.J. Yang, J.Z. Zhou, W. Wu, and F. Liu. Application of improved particle swarm optimization in economic dispatching. Power System Technology, 29(2):1–4, 2005.
[48] T. Sibalija, S. Pentronic, and D. Milovanovic. Experimental optimization of nimonic 263 laser cutting using a particle swarm approach. Metals, 9:1147, 2019. doi: 10.3390/met9111147.
[49] X. Luan, H. Younse, H. Hong, G.P. Peterson. Improving mechanical properties of PVA based nano composite using aligned single-wall carbon nanotubes. Materials Research Express, 6 (10):1050a6, 2019. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab4058.
[50] H. Younes, R.A. Al-Rub, M.M. Rahman, A. Dalaq, A.A. Ghaferi, and T. Shah. Processing and property investigation of high-density carbon nanostructured papers with superior conductive and mechanical properties. Diamond and Related Materials, 68:109–117, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2016.06.016.
[51] G. Christensen, H. Younes, H. Hong, and G.P. Peterson. Alignment of carbon nanotubes comprising magnetically sensitive metal oxides by nonionic chemical surfactants. Journal of Nanofluids, 2(1): 25–28, 2013. doi: 10.1166/jon.2013.1031.
[52] H. Younes, M.M. Rahman, A.A. Ghaferi, and I. Saadat. Effect of saline solution on the electrical response of single wall carbon nanotubes-epoxy nanocomposites. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2017: 6843403, 2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/6843403.
[53] H. Younes, G. Christensen, L. Groven, H. Hong, and P. Smith. Three dimensional (3D) percolation network structure: Key to form stable carbon nano grease. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 14(6):375–382, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jart.2016.09.002.
[54] J. Jerald, P. Asokan, G. Prabaharan, and R. Saravanan. Scheduling optimization of flexible manufacturing systems using particle swarm optimization algorithm. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturig Technology, 25:964–971, 2005. doi: 10.1007/s00170-003-1933-2.
[55] M. Ghasemi, E. Akbari, A. Rahimnejad, S.E. Razavi, S. Ghavidel, and L. Li. Phasor particle swarm optimization: a simple and efficient variant of PSO. Soft Computing, 23:9701–9718, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00500-018-3536-8.
[56] M.R. Singh and S.S. Mahapatra. A swarm optimization approach for flexible flow shop scheduling with multiprocessor tasks. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 62(1–4), 267–277, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3807-3.
[57] H. Yoshida, K. Kawata, Y. Fukuyama, S. Takayama, and Y. Nakanishi. A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(4):1232–1239, 2000. doi: 10.1109/59.898095.
[58] F. Belmecheri, C. Prins, F. Yalaoui, and L. Amodeo. Particle swarm optimization algorithm for a vehicle routing problem with heterogeneous fleet, mixed backhauls, and time windows. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(4):775–789, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10845-012-0627-8.
[59] M. Bachlaus, M.K. Pandey, C. Mahajan, R. Shankar, and M.K. Tiwari. Designing an integrated multi-echelon agile supply chain network: a hybrid taguchi-particle swarm optimization approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(6):747–761, 2008. doi: 10.1007/s10845-008-0125-1.
[60] B. Brandstatter and U. Baumgartner. Particle swarm optimization – mass-spring system analogon. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 38(2):997–1000, 2002. doi: 10.1109/20.996256.
[61] B. Kim and S. Son. A probability matrix-based particle swarm optimization for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4):1119–1126, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10845-010-0455-7.
[62] C.H. Wu, D.Z. Wang, A. Ip, D.W. Wang, C.Y. Chan, and H.F. Wan. A particle swarm optimization approach for components placement inspection on printed circuit boards. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20(5):535–549, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10845-008-0140-2.
[63] S.B. Raja and N. Baskar. Application of particle swarm optimization technique for achieving desired milled surface roughness in minimum machining time. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5):5982–5989, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.110.
[64] N. Yusup, A.M. Zain, and S.Z.M. Hashim. Overview of PSO for optimizing process parameters of machining. Procedia Engineering, 29:914–923, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.064.
[65] R.L. Malghan, K.M.C. Rao, A.K. Shettigar, S.S. Rao, and R.J. D'Souza. Application of particle swarm optimization and response surface methodology for machining parameters optimization of aluminium matrix composites in milling operation. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 39(9):2541–3553, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s40430-016-0675-7.
[66] A. Hadidi, A. Kaveh, B. Farahmand Azar, S. Talatahari, and C. Farahmandpour. An efficient optimization algorithm based on particle swarm and simulated annealing for space trusses. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 3:377–395, 2011.
[67] T. Chaudhary, A.N. Siddiquee, A.K. Chanda, and Z.A. Khan. On micromachining with a focus on miniature gears by non conventional processes: a status report. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 65(1):129–169, 2018. doi: 10.24425/119413.
[68] D. Kumar and K.K Singh. An experimental investigation of surface roughness in the drilling of MWCNT doped carbon/epoxy polymeric composite material. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 149:012096, 2016. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012096.
[69] Niharika, B.P. Agrawal, I.A. Khan, and Z.A. Khan. Effects of cutting parameters on quality of surface produced by machining of titanium alloy and their optimization. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 63(4):531–548, 2016. doi: 10.1515/meceng-2016-0030.
[70] N.S. Kumar, A. Shetty, Ashay Shetty, K. Ananth, and H. Shetty. Effect of spindle speed and feed rate on surface roughness of carbon steels in CNC turning. Procedia Engineering, 38:691– 697, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.087.
[71] E.T. Akinlabi, I. Mathoho, M.P. Mubiayi, C. Mbohwa, and M.E. Makhatha. Effect of process parameters on surface roughness during dry and flood milling of Ti-6A-l4V. In: 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT), pages 144–147, Cape Town, South Africa, 10-13 February 2018. doi: 10.1109/ICMIMT.2018.8340438.
[72] J.P. Davim, L.R. Silva, A. Festas, and A.M. Abrão. Machinability study on precision turning of PA66 polyamide with and without glass fiber reinforcing. Materials & Design, 30(2):228– 234, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.003.
[73] J. Cha, J. Kim, S. Ryu, and S.H. Hong. Comparison to mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets. Composites Part B: Engineering, 162:283–288, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.011.
[74] R.V. Rao, P.J. Pawar, and R. Shankar. Multi-objective optimization of electrochemical machining process parameters using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222(8):949–958, 2008. doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM1158.
[75] R. Farshbaf Zinati, M.R. Razfar, and H. Nazockdast. Surface integrity investigation for milling PA6/ MWCNT. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 30(8):1035–1041, 2014. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2014.961473.
[76] I. Shyha, G.Y. Fu, D.H. Huo, B. Le, F. Inam, M.S. Saharudin, and J.C. Wei. Micro-machining of nano-polymer composites reinforced with graphene and nano-clay fillers. Key Engineering Materials, 786:197–205, 2018. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.786.197.
[77] G. Fu, D. Huo, I. Shyha, K. Pancholi, and M.S. Saharudin. Experimental investigation on micro milling of polyester/halloysite nano-clay nanocomposites. Nanomaterials, 9(7):917, 2019. doi: 10.3390/nano9070917.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Prakhar Kumar Kharwar
1
Rajesh Kumar Verma
1
Nirmal Kumar Mandal
2
Arpan Kumar Mondal
2

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology Gorakhpur, India.
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers’ Training and Research, Kolkata, India.
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The present study has been taken up to emphasize the role of the hybridization process for optimizing a given reinforced concrete (RC) frame. Although various primary techniques have been hybrid in the past with varying degree of success, the effect of hybridization of enhanced versions of standard optimization techniques has found little attention. The focus of the current study is to see if it is possible to maintain and carry the positive effects of enhanced versions of two different techniques while using their hybrid algorithms. For this purpose, enhanced versions of standard particle swarm optimization (PSO) and a standard gravitational search algorithm (GSA), were considered for optimizing an RC frame. The enhanced version of PSO involves its democratization by considering all good and bad experiences of the particles, whereas the enhanced version of the GSA is made self-adaptive by considering a specific range for certain parameters, like the gravitational constant and a set of agents with the best fitness values. The optimization process, being iterative in nature, has been coded in C++. The analysis and design procedure is based on the specifications of Indian codes. Two distinct advantages of enhanced versions of standard PSO and GSA, namely, better capability to escape from local optima and a faster convergence rate, have been tested for the hybrid algorithm. The entire formulation for optimal cost design of a frame includes the cost of beams and columns. The variables of each element of structural frame have been considered as continuous and rounded off appropriately to consider practical limitations. An example has also been considered to emphasize the validity of this optimum design procedure.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sonia Chutani
Jagbir Singh
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Results of hydroacoustic investigations of krill swarms occurring southwest of Elephant Island carried out between 30 October and 5 November 1986, are presented. Krill swarms of the geometric length of 32 m, mean vertical cross section area of 206 m2 , and mean density of 133 g m-3 were recorded and measured. Biomass distribution is presented in maps. The highest density values amounting to 5001 nM-2 were recorded in the eastern part of the survey area, above the slope of Elephant Island's shelf. On the basis of upper and lower limits of the occurrence of given krill swarms, a scheme of their vertical, diurnal distribution was constructed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Janusz Kalinowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Five models and methodology are discussed in this paper for constructing classifiers capable of recognizing in real time the type of fuel injected into a diesel engine cylinder to accuracy acceptable in practical technical applications. Experimental research was carried out on the dynamic engine test facility. The signal of in-cylinder and in-injection line pressure in an internal combustion engine powered by mineral fuel, biodiesel or blends of these two fuel types was evaluated using the vibro-acoustic method. Computational intelligence methods such as classification trees, particle swarm optimization and random forest were applied.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Bąkowski
Michał Kekez
Leszek Radziszewski
Alžbeta Sapietova
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper an algorithm and computer code for the identification of the hysteresis parameters of the Jiles-Atherton model have been presented. For the identification the particle swarm optimization method (PSO) has been applied. In the optimization procedure five design variables has been assumed. The computer code has been elaborated using Delphi environment. Three types of material have been examined. The results of optimization have been compared to experimental ones. Selected results of the calculation for different material are presented and discussed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Łukasz Knypiński
Lech Nowak
Piotr Sujka
Kazimierz Radziuk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In order to overcome the shortcomings of the dolphin algorithm, which is prone to falling into local optimum and premature convergence, an improved dolphin swarm algorithm, based on the standard dolphin algorithm, was proposed. As a measure of uncertainty, information entropy was used to measure the search stage in the dolphin swarm algorithm. Adaptive step size parameters and dynamic balance factors were introduced to correlate the search step size with the number of iterations and fitness, and to perform adaptive adjustment of the algorithm. Simulation experiments show that, comparing with the basic algorithm and other algorithms, the improved dolphin swarm algorithm is feasible and effective.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Y. Li
X. Wang
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Economic Load Dispatch (ELD) is utilized in finding the optimal combination of the real power generation that minimizes total generation cost, yet satisfying all equality and inequality constraints. It plays a significant role in planning and operating power systems with several generating stations. For simplicity, the cost function of each generating unit has been approximated by a single quadratic function. ELD is a subproblem of unit commitment and a nonlinear optimization problem. Many soft computing optimization methods have been developed in the recent past to solve ELD problems. In this paper, the most recently developed population-based optimization called the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) has been utilized to solve the ELD problem. The results for the ELD problem have been verified by applying it to a standard 6-generator system with and without due consideration of transmission losses. The finally obtained results using the SSA are compared to that with the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. It has been observed that the obtained results using the SSA are quite encouraging.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Rogers G., Power systems oscillations, Springer Science & Business Media (2012).
[2] Grainger J.J., StevensonW.D., Chang G.W., Power Systems Analysis, Mc Graw Hill Education (2003).
[3] Soft S., Power system economics: designing markets for electricity, Wiley-Interscience, Piscataway, NJ: New York (2002).
[4] Sheta A., Faris H., Braik M., Mirjalil S., Nature-Inspired Metaheuristics Search Algorithms for Solving the Economic Load Dispatch Problem of Power System: A Comparison Study, Applied Nature-Inspired Computing: Algorithms and Case Studies, Springer, pp. 199–230 (2020).
[5] Singht H.P., Singht Brar Y., Koyhari D.P., Reactive power based fair calculation approach for multiobjective load dispatch problem, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 719–735 (2019).
[6] Mistri A., Kumar Roy P., Mandal B., Chaotic biogeography-based optimization (CBBO) algorithm applied to economic load dispatch problem, Proceedings of National Conference on Emerging Trends on Sustainable Technology and Engineering Applications (NCETSTEA), Durgapur, India, pp. 1–5 (2020).
[7] Zhang Q., Zou D., Duan N., Shen X., An adaptive differential evolutionary algorithm incorporating multiple mutation strategies for the economic load dispatch problem, Applied Soft Computing, vol. 78, pp. 641–669 (2019).
[8] Singh D., Dhillon J.S., Ameliorated greywolf optimization for economic load dispatch problem, Energy, vol. 169, pp. 398–419 (2019).
[9] Raja M.A.Z., Ahmed U., Zameer A., Kiani A.K., Chaudhary N.I., Bio-inspired heuristics hybrid with sequential quadratic programming and interior-point methods for reliable treatment of economic load dispatch problem, Neutral Computing and Applications, vol. 31, no. S1, pp. 447–475 (2019).
[10] Hr S., Kaboli A., Alqallaf A.K., Solving non-convex economic load dispatch problem via artificial cooperative search algorithm, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 128, pp. 14–27 (2019).
[11] Al-Betar M.A., Awadallah M.A., Krishan M.M., A non-convex economic load dispatch problem with valve loading effect using a hybrid grey wolf optimizer, Neutral Computing and Applications, vol. 32, pp. 12127–12154 (2020).
[12] Mirjalili S., Gandomi A.H., Mirjalili S.Z., Saremi S., Faris H., Mirjalili S.M., Salp SwarmAlgorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems, Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 114, pp. 163–191 (2017).
[13] Yang B., Zhonga L., Zhang X., Shua H., Yu T., Li H., Sun L., Novel bio-inspired memetic salp swarm algorithm and application to MPPT for PV systems considering partial shading condition, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 215, pp. 1203–1222 (2019).
[14] Ibrahim R.A., Ewees A.A., Oliva D., Abd Elaziz M., Lu S., Improved salp swarm algorithm based on particle swarm optimization for feature selection, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 3155–3169 (2019).
[15] Abbassi R., Abbassi A., Heidari A.A., Mirjalili S., An efficient salp swarm-inspired algorithm for parameters identification of photovoltaic cell models, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 179, pp. 362–372 (2019).
[16] Sayed G.I., Khoriba G., Haggag M.H., A novel chaotic salp swarm algorithm for global optimization and feature selection, Applied Intelligence, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 3462–3481 (2018).
[17] Faris H., Mafarjab M.M., Heidaric A.A., Aljarah I., Mirjalilid S., Fujitae H., An efficient binary Salp Swarm Algorithm with crossover scheme for feature selection problems, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 154, pp. 43–67 (2018).
[18] Hussien A.G., Hassanien A.E., Houssein E.H., Swarming behaviour of salps algorithm for predicting chemical compound activities, Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information (2017), DOI: 10.1109/INTELCIS.2017.8260072.
[19] Zhang J.,Wang J.S., Improved Salp Swarm Algorithm Based on Levy Flight and Sine Cosine Operator, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 99740–99771 (2020).
[20] Patnana N., Pattnaik S., Varshney T., Singh V., Self-Learning Salp Swarm Optimization Based PID Design of Doha RO Plant, Algorithms, vol. 13, no. 287, pp. 1–14 (2020).
[21] Hussien A.G., Hassanien A.E., Houssein E.H., Swarming behaviour of salps algorithm for predicting chemical compound activities, Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS), Cairo, pp. 315–320 (2017).
[22] Khan I.A., Alghamdi A., Touqeer Ahmed Jumani T.A., Alamgir A., Ahmed Bilal Awan A., Attaullah Khidrani A., Salp SwarmOptimization Algorithm-Based Fractional Order PID Controller for Dynamic Response and Stability Enhancement of an Automatic Voltage Regulator System, Electronics, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1–17 (2019).
[23] Mutluer M., Sahman A., Cunkas M., Heuristic optimization based on penalty approach for surface permanent magnet synchronous machines, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 45, pp. 6751–6767 (2020).
[24] Knypinski Ł., Pawełoszek K., Le Manech Y., Optimization of low-power line-start PM motor using gray wolf metaheuristic algorithm, Energies, vol. 13, no. 5 (2020).
[25] Knypinski Ł., J˛edryczka C., Demenko A., Influence of the shape of squirrel cage bars on the dimensions of permanent magnets in an optimized line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor, COMPEL, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 298–308 (2017).
[26] Kennedy J., Eberhart R., Particle Swarm Optimization, Proceedings of the International Conference on Neutral Networks, Perth, Australia, pp. 1942–1948 (1995).
[27] Freitas D., Guerreiro Lopes L., Morgado-Dias F., Particle Swarm Optimization : A historical review up to the current developments, Entropy, vol. 22, no. 362, pp. 1–36 (2020).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ramesh Devarapalli
1
ORCID: ORCID
Nikhil Kumar Sinha
1
ORCID: ORCID
Bathina Venkateswara Rao
2
ORCID: ORCID
Łukasz Knypinski
3
ORCID: ORCID
Naraharisetti Jaya Naga Lakshmi
4
ORCID: ORCID
Fausto Pedro García Márquez
5
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of EE, B. I. T. Sindri, Dhanbad, Jharkhand – 828123, India
  2. Department of EEE, V R Siddhartha Engineering College (Autonomous), Vijayawada-520007, A.P., India
  3. Poznan University of Technology, Poland
  4. SR Engineering College: Warangal, Telangana, India
  5. Ingenium Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The hybridization of a recently suggested Harris hawk’s optimizer (HHO) with the traditional particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been proposed in this paper. The velocity function update in each iteration of the PSO technique has been adopted to avoid being trapped into local search space with HHO. The performance of the proposed Integrated HHO-PSO (IHHOPSO) is evaluated using 23 benchmark functions and compared with the novel algorithms and hybrid versions of the neighbouring standard algorithms. Statistical analysis with the proposed algorithm is presented, and the effectiveness is shown in the comparison of grey wolf optimization (GWO), Harris hawks optimizer (HHO), barnacles matting optimization (BMO) and hybrid GWO-PSO algorithms. The comparison in convergence characters with the considered set of optimization methods also presented along with the boxplot. The proposed algorithm is further validated via an emerging engineering case study of controller parameter tuning of power system stability enhancement problem. The considered case study tunes the parameters of STATCOM and power system stabilizers (PSS) connected in a sample power network with the proposed IHHOPSO algorithm. A multi-objective function has been considered and different operating conditions has been investigated in this papers which recommends proposed algorithm in an effective damping of power network oscillations.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] M. Crepinsek, S.-H. Liu, and L. Mernik: A note on teaching–learningbased optimization algorithm. Information Sciences, 212 (2012), 79–93, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.05.009.
[2] Anita and A. Yadav: AEFA: Artificial electric field algorithm for global optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 48 (2019), 93–108, DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.03.013.
[3] R. Devarapalli and B. Bhattacharyya: A hybrid modified grey wolf optimization-sine cosine algorithm-based power system stabilizer parameter tuning in a multimachine power system. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 41(4), (2020), 1143-1159, DOI: 10.1002/oca.2591.
[4] M. Jain, V. Singh, and A. Rani: A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: Squirrel search algorithm, Swarmand Evolutionary Computation, 44 (2019), 148–175, DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.02.013.
[5] A.E. Eiben and J.E. Smith: What is an Evolutionary Algorithm? In Introduction to Evolutionary Computing, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015, 25–48, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44874-8_3.
[6] A. Kaveh and M. Khayatazad: A new meta-heuristic method: Ray Optimization. Computers & Structures, 112–113, (2012), 283–294, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.09.003.
[7] P.J.M. van Laarhoven and E.H.L. Aarts: Simulated annealing. In Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications, P.J.M. van Laarhoven and E.H.L. Aarts, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987, 7–15, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7744-1_2.
[8] Agenetic algorithm tutorial. SpringerLink. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00175354 (accessed Mar. 20, 2020).
[9] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart: Particle Swarm Optimization. Proc. of ICNN’95 International Conference on Neural Networks, 4 (1995), 1942– 1948.
[10] M. Neshat, G. Sepidnam, M. Sargolzaei, and A.N. Toosi: Artificial fish swarm algorithm: a survey of the state-of-the-art, hybridization, combinatorial and indicative applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(4), (2014), 965–997, DOI: 10.1007/s10462-012-9342-2.
[11] M. Dorigo, M. Birattari, and T. Stutzle: Ant colony optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(4), (2006), 28–39, DOI: 10.1109/ MCI.2006.329691.
[12] M. Roth and S. Wicker: Termite: ad-hoc networking with stigmergy. In GLOBECOM’03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489), 5 (2003), 2937–2941, DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2003.1258772.
[13] D. Karaboga and B. Akay: A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 214(1), (2009), 108– 132, DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.090.
[14] A. Mucherino and O. Seref: Monkey search: a novel metaheuristic search for global optimization. AIP Conference Proceedings, 953(1), (2007), 162– 173, DOI: 10.1063/1.2817338.
[15] E.Atashpaz-Gargari and C. Lucas: Imperialist competitive algorithm: An algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, (2007), 4661–4667, DOI: 10.1109/CEC.2007.4425083.
[16] D. Simon: Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 12(6), (2008), 702–713, DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2008.919004.
[17] X.-S. Yang: Firefly algorithm. Stochastic, test, functions and design optimisation. arXiv:1003.1409 [math], Mar. 2010, Accessed: Mar. 20, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1409.
[18] K.M.Gates and P.C.M. Molenaar: Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63(1), (2012), 310–319, DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026.
[19] E. Rashedi, H. Nezamabadi-Pour, and S. Saryazdi: GSA: A gravitational search algorithm. Information Sciences, 179(13), (2009), 2232–2248, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004.
[20] Y. Tan andY. Zhu: Fireworks Algorithm for Optimization. In: TanY., ShiY., Tan K.C. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6145, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13495-1_44.
[21] X.-S. Yang: Bat algorithm for multi-objective optimisation. arXiv: 1203. 6571 [math], Mar. 2012, Accessed: Mar. 20, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.6571.
[22] LingWang, Xiao-long Zheng, and Sheng-yaoWang:Anovel binary fruit fly optimization algorithm for solving the multidimensional knapsack problem. Knowledge-Based Systems, 48 17–23, (2013), DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.04.003.
[23] X.-S. Yang: Flower Pollination Algorithm for Global Optimization. In Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012, 240–249, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32894-7_27.
[24] G.-G. Wang, L. Guo, A.H. Gandomi, G.-S. Hao, and H. Wang: Chaotic Krill Herd algorithm. Information Sciences, 274 (2014), 17–34, DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.123.
[25] A. Kaveh and N. Farhoudi: A new optimization method: Dolphin echolocation. Advances in Engineering Software, 59 (2013), 53–70, DOI: 10.1016/ j.advengsoft.2013.03.004.
[26] S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis: GreyWolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69 (2014), 46–61, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.
[27] A. Hatamlou: Black hole: A new heuristic optimization approach for data clustering. Information Sciences, 222 (2013), 175–184, DOI: 10.1016/ j.ins.2012.08.023.
[28] A. Sadollah, A. Bahreininejad, H. Eskandar and M. Hamdi: Mine blast algorithm: A new population based algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problem. Applied Soft Computing, 13(5), (2013), 2592–2612, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.026.
[29] S. Mirjalili: Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(4), (2016), 1053–1073, DOI: 10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1.
[30] S. Mirjalili: Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89 (2015), 228–249, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006.
[31] F.A. Hashim, E.H. Houssein, M.S. Mabrouk, W. Al-Atabany, and S. Mirjalili: Henry gas solubility optimization: A novel physics-based algorithm. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101 (2019), 646–667, DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.07.015.
[32] S. Mirjalili: The ant lion optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 83 (2015), 80–98, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010.
[33] H. Shareef, A.A. Ibrahim, and A.H. Mutlag: Lightning search algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 36 (2015), 315–333, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.028.
[34] S.A. Uymaz, G. Tezel, and E. Yel: Artificial algae algorithm (AAA) for nonlinear global optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 31 (2015), 153–171, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.003.
[35] M.D. Li, H. Zhao, X.W. Weng, and T. Han: A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: Virus colony search. Advances in Engineering Software, 92 (2016), 65–88, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.11.004.
[36] O. Abedinia, N. Amjady, and A. Ghasemi: A new metaheuristic algorithm based on shark smell optimization. Complexity, 21(5), (2016), 97–116, DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21634.
[37] S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, and A. Hatamlou: Multi-Verse optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(2), (2016), 495–513, DOI: 10.1007/s00521-015-1870-7.
[38] S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis: The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 95 (2016), 51–67, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft. 2016.01.008.
[39] A. Askarzadeh: A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm. Computers and Structures, 169 (2016), 1–12, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.
[40] T. Wu, M. Yao, and J. Yang: Dolphin swarm algorithm. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 17(8), (2016), 717–729, DOI: 10.1631/FITEE.1500287.
[41] S. Mirjalili: SCA: A sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 96 (2016), 120–133, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022.
[42] A. Kaveh and A. Dadras: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm: Thermal exchange optimization. Advances in Engineering Software, 110, (2017), 69–84, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.03.014.
[43] M.M. Mafarja, I. Aljarah, A. Asghar Heidari, A.I. Hammouri, H. Faris, Ala’M. Al-Zoubi, and S. Mirjalili: Evolutionary population dynamics and grasshopper optimization approaches for feature selection problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 145 (2018), 25–45, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.037.
[44] A. Tabari and A. Ahmad: A new optimization method: Electro-search algorithm. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 103 (2017), 1–11, DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.01.046.
[45] G. Dhiman and V. Kumar: Spotted hyena optimizer: A novel bio-inspired based metaheuristic technique for engineering applications. Advances in Engineering Software, 114 (2017), 48–70, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft. 2017.05.014.
[46] S.-A. Ahmadi: Human behavior-based optimization: a novel metaheuristic approach to solve complex optimization problems. Neural Comput and Applications, 28(S1), (2017), 233–244, DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2334-4.
[47] A.F. Nematollahi, A. Rahiminejad, and B. Vahidi: A novel physical based meta-heuristic optimization method known as lightning attachment procedure optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 59 (2017), 596–621, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.033.
[48] R.A. Ibrahim, A.A. Ewees, D. Oliva, M. Abd Elaziz, and S. Lu: Improved salp swarm algorithm based on particle swarm optimization for feature selection. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(8), (2019), 3155–3169, DOI: 10.1007/s12652-018-1031-9.
[49] E. Jahani and M. Chizari: Tackling global optimization problems with a novel algorithm – Mouth brooding fish algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 62 (2018), 987–1002, DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.035.
[50] X. Qi, Y. Zhu, and H. Zhang: A new meta-heuristic butterfly-inspired algorithm. Journal of Computational Science, 23 (2017), 226–239, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.06.003.
[51] S. Mirjalili: Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89 (2015), 228–249, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006.
[52] M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni: Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 26(1), (1996), 29–41, DOI: 10.1109/3477.484436.
[53] S. Mirjalili and S.Z.M. Hashim: A new hybrid PSOGSA algorithm for function optimization. In 2010 International Conference on Computer and Information Application, (2010), 374–377, DOI: 10.1109/ICCIA.2010.6141614.
[54] F.A. Senel, F. Gokce, A.S. Yuksel, and T. Yigit: A novel hybrid PSO– GWO algorithm for optimization problems. Engineering with Computers, 35(4), 1359–1373, DOI: 10.1007/s00366-018-0668-5.
[55] D.T. Bui, H. Moayedi, B. Kalantar, and A. Osouli: Harris hawks optimization: A novel swarm intelligence technique for spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility. Sensors, 19(14), (2019), 3590, DOI: 10.3390/s19163590.
[56] H. Chen, S. Jiao, M.Wang, A.A. Heidari, and X. Zhao: Parameters identification of photovoltaic cells and modules using diversification-enriched Harris hawks optimization with chaotic drifts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244 (2020), p. 118778, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118778.
[57] A.A. Heidari, S. Mirjalili, H. Faris, I. Aljarah, M. Mafarja, and H. Chen: Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97 (2019), 849–872, DOI: 10.1016/ j.future.2019.02.028.
[58] M. Jamil and X.-S. Yang: A literature survey of benchmark functions for global optimization problems. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 4(2), (2013), 150, DOI: 10.1504/IJMMNO.2013.055204.
[59] A. Kaveh and S. Talatahari: A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search. Acta Mechanica, 213(3–4), (2010), 267–289, DOI: 10.1007/s00707-009-0270-4.
[60] J. Luo and B. Shi: Ahybrid whale optimization algorithm based on modified differential evolution for global optimization problems. Applied Intelligence, 49(5), (2000), 1982–2000, DOI: 10.1007/s10489-018-1362-4.
[61] A.A. Heidari, S. Mirjalili, H. Faris, I. Aljarah, M. Mafarja, and H. Chen: Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97 (2019), 849–872, DOI: 10.1016/ j.future.2019.02.028.
[62] P. Pruski and S. Paszek: Location of generating units most affecting the angular stability of the power system based on the analysis of instantaneous power waveforms. Archives of Control Sciences, 30(2), (2020), 273–293, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2020.133500.
[63] M.M. Hossain and A.Z. Khurshudyan: Heuristic control of nonlinear power systems: Application to the infinite bus problem. Archives of Control Sciences, 29(2), (2019), 279–288, DOI: 10.24425/acs.2019.129382.
[64] R. Devarapalli and B. Bhattacharyya:Aframework for H2=H? synthesis in damping power network oscillations with STATCOM. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 44 (2020), 927-948, DOI: 10.1007/s40998-019-00278-4.
[65] G. Gurrala and I. Sen: Power system stabilizers design for interconnected power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25(2), (2010), 1042– 1051, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036778.
[66] R.K. Varma: Introduction to FACTS controllers. In 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, (2009), 1–6, DOI: 10.1109/PSCE.2009.4840114.
[67] P. Kundur: Power System Stability and Control. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1994.
[68] M. Belazzoug, M. Boudour, and K. Sebaa: FACTS location and size for reactive power system compensation through the multi-objective optimization. Archives of Control Sciences, 20(4), (2010), 473–489, DOI: 10.2478/v10170-010-0027-2
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ramesh Devarapalli
1
ORCID: ORCID
Vikash Kumar
1

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, B.I.T. Sindri, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this study, the inverter in a microgrid was adjusted by the particle swarm optimization (PSO) based coordinated control strategy to ensure the stability of the isolated island operation. The simulation results showed that the voltage at the inverter port reduced instantaneously, and the voltage unbalance degree of its port and the port of point of common coupling (PCC) exceeded the normal standard when the microgrid entered the isolated island mode. After using the coordinated control strategy, the voltage rapidly recovered, and the voltage unbalance degree rapidly reduced to the normal level. The coordinated control strategy is better than the normal control strategy.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Mohamed A., Lamhamdi T., Moussaoui H.E., Markhi H.E., Intelligent energy management system of a smart microgrid using multiagent systems, Archives of Electrical Engineering, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 23–38 (2020).
[2] Selakov A., Bekut D., Sari A.T., A novel agent-based microgrid optimal control for grid-connected, planned island and emergency island operations, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1999–2022 (2016).
[3] Obara S., Sato K., Utsugi Y., Study on the operation optimization of an isolated island microgrid with renewable energy layout planning, Energy, vol. 161, no. OCT.15, pp. 1211–1225 (2018).
[4] Zhang T.F., Li X.X., A Control Strategy for Smooth Switching Between Island Operation Mode and Grid-Connection Operation Mode of Microgrid Containing Photovoltaic Generations, Power System Technology, vol. 39, pp. 904–910 (2015).
[5] Liang H., Dong Y., Huang Y., Zheng C., Li P., Modeling of Multiple Master–Slave Control under Island Microgrid and Stability Analysis Based on Control Parameter Configuration, Energies, vol. 11, no. 9 (2018).
[6] Zhang L., Chen K., Lyu L., Cai G., Research on the Operation Control Strategy of a Low-Voltage Direct Current Microgrid Based on a Disturbance Observer and Neural Network Adaptive Control Algorithm, Energies, vol. 12, no. 6 (2019).
[7] MaY.,Yang P., Guo H.,WangY., Dynamic Economic Dispatch and Control of a Stand-alone Microgrid in DongAo Island, Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1433–1441 (2015).
[8] Worku M., Hassan M., Abido M., Real Time Energy Management and Control of Renewable Energy based Microgrid in Grid Connected and Island Modes, Energies, vol. 12, no. 2 (2019).
[9] Xu X., Zhou X., Control Strategy for Smooth Transfer Between Grid-connected and Island Operation for Micro Grid, High Voltage Engineering, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2754–2760 (2018).
[10] Roque J.A.M., Gonzalez R.O., Rivas J.J.R., Castillo O.C., Caporal R.M., Design of aNew Controller for an Inverter Operation in Transitional Regime Within a Microgrid, IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 4724–4732 (2017).
[11] Ma Y., Yang P., Zhao Z., Wang Y., Optimal Economic Operation of Islanded Microgrid by Using a Modified PSO Algorithm, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, pp. 1–10 (2015).
[12] Li P., Xu D., Zhou Z., Lee W., Zhao B., Stochastic Optimal Operation of Microgrid Based on Chaotic Binary Particle SwarmOptimization, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 66–73 (2016).
[13] Tan Y., Cao Y., Li C., Li Y., Yu L., Zhang Z., Tang S., Microgrid stochastic economic load dispatch based on two-point estimate method and improved particle swarm optimization, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2144–2164 (2015).
[14] Radosavljevic J., Jevtic M., Klimenta D., Energy and operation management of a microgrid using particle swarm optimization, Engineering Optimization, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1–20 (2015).
[15] Maulik A., Das D., Optimal operation of microgrid using four different optimization techniques, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 21, pp. 100–120 (2017), DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2017.04.005.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Pan Wu
1
ORCID: ORCID
Xiaowei Xu
2

  1. Power Supply Co., Ltd.Luqiao District, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  2. Power Supply Co., Ltd.Tonglu, Zhejiang Province, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The electrical grid integration takes great attention because of the increasing population in the nonlinear load connected to the power distribution system. This manuscript deals with the power quality issues and mitigations associated with the electrical grid. The proposed single comprehensive artificial neural network (SCANN) controller with unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) is modelled in MATLAB Simulink environment. It provides series and shunt compensation that helps mitigate voltage and current distortion at the end of the distribution system. Initially, four proportional integral (PI) controllers are used to control the UPQC. Later the trained SCANN controller replaces four PI Controllers for better control action. PI and SCANN controllers’ simulation results are compared to find the optimal solutions. A prototype model of SCANN controller is constructed and tested. The test results show that the SCANN based UPQC maintains grid voltage and current magnitude within permissible limits under fluctuating conditions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Varadharajan Balaji
1
Subramanian Chitra
2

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu – 641049, India and Research Scholar (Electrical), Anna University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
  2. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu – 641049, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The near net shaped manufacturing ability of squeeze casting process requiresto set the process variable combinations at their optimal

levels to obtain both aesthetic appearance and internal soundness of the cast parts. The aesthetic and internal soundness of cast parts deal

with surface roughness and tensile strength those can readily put the part in service without the requirement of costly secondary

manufacturing processes (like polishing, shot blasting, plating, hear treatment etc.). It is difficult to determine the levels of the process

variable (that is, pressure duration, squeeze pressure, pouring temperature and die temperature) combinations for extreme values of the

responses (that is, surface roughness, yield strength and ultimate tensile strength) due to conflicting requirements. In the present

manuscript, three population based search and optimization methods, namely genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO)

and multi-objective particle swarm optimization based on crowding distance (MOPSO-CD) methods have been used to optimize multiple

outputs simultaneously. Further, validation test has been conducted for the optimal casting conditions suggested by GA, PSO and

MOPSO-CD. The results showed that PSO outperformed GA with regard to computation time.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

G.C.M. Patel
P. Krishna
P.R. Vundavilli
M.B. Parappagoudar
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences (Bull.Pol. Ac.: Tech.) is published bimonthly by the Division IV Engineering Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences, since the beginning of the existence of the PAS in 1952. The journal is peer‐reviewed and is published both in printed and electronic form. It is established for the publication of original high quality papers from multidisciplinary Engineering sciences with the following topics preferred: Artificial and Computational Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Civil Engineering, Control, Informatics and Robotics, Electronics, Telecommunication and Optoelectronics, Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, Thermodynamics, Material Science and Nanotechnology, Power Systems and Power Electronics.

Journal Metrics: JCR Impact Factor 2018: 1.361, 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.323, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.319, Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.005, CiteScore 2017: 1.27, The Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education 2017: 25 points.

Abbreviations/Acronym: Journal citation: Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech., ISO: Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci.-Tech. Sci., JCR Abbrev: B POL ACAD SCI-TECH Acronym in the Editorial System: BPASTS.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Juan C. Seck-Tuoh-Mora
Joselito Medina-Marin
Erick S. Martinez-Gomez
Eva S. Hernandez-Gress
Norberto Hernandez-Romero
Valeria Volpi-Leon
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents optimization of power line geometrical parameters aimed to reduce the intensity of the electric field and magnetic field intensity under an overhead power line with the use of a genetic algorithm (AG) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The variation of charge distribution along the conductors as well as the sag of the overhead line and induced currents in earth wires were taken into account. The conductor sag was approximated by a chain curve. The charge simulation method (CSM) and the method of images were used in the simulations of an electric field, while a magnetic field were calculated using the Biot–Savart law. Sample calculations in a three-dimensional system were made for a 220 kV single – circuit power line. A comparison of the used optimization algorithms was made.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Krzysztof Król
Wojciech Machczyński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive particle swarm optimization (APSO) based LQR controller for optimal tuning of state feedback controller gains for a class of under actuated system (Inverted pendulum). Normally, the weights of LQR controller are chosen based on trial and error approach to obtain the optimum controller gains, but it is often cumbersome and tedious to tune the controller gains via trial and error method. To address this problem, an intelligent approach employing adaptive PSO (APSO) for optimum tuning of LQR is proposed. In this approach, an adaptive inertia weight factor (AIWF), which adjusts the inertia weight according to the success rate of the particles, is employed to not only speed up the search process but also to increase the accuracy of the algorithm towards obtaining the optimum controller gain. The performance of the proposed approach is tested on a bench mark inverted pendulum system, and the experimental results of APSO are compared with that of the conventional PSO and GA. Experimental results prove that the proposed algorithm remarkably improves the convergence speed and precision of PSO in obtaining the robust trajectory tracking of inverted pendulum.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jovitha Jerome
Kumar E. Vinodh
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents an effective method of network overload management in power systems. The three competing objectives 1) generation cost 2) transmission line overload and 3) real power loss are optimized to provide pareto-optimal solutions. A fuzzy ranking based non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is used to solve this complex nonlinear optimization problem. The minimization of competing objectives is done by generation rescheduling. Fuzzy ranking method is employed to extract the best compromise solution out of the available non-dominated solutions depending upon its highest rank. N-1 contingency analysis is carried out to identify the most severe lines and those lines are selected for outage. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated for different contingency cases in IEEE 30 and IEEE 118 bus systems with smooth cost functions and their results are compared with other single objective evolutionary algorithms like Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Differential evolution (DE). Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach to generate well distributed pareto-optimal non-dominated solutions of multi-objective problem
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

K. Pandiarajan
C.K. Babulal
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper voltage stability is analysed based not only on the voltage deviations from the nominal values but also on the number of limit violating buses and severity of voltage limit violations. The expression of the actual state of the system as a numerical index like severity, aids the system operator in taking better security related decisions at control centres both during a period of contingency and also at a highly stressed operating condition. In contrary to conventional N – 1 contingency analysis, Northern Electric Reliability Council (NERC) recommends N – 2 line contingency analysis. The decision of the system operator to overcome the present contingency state of the system must blend harmoniously with the stability of the system. Hence the work presents a novel N – 2 contingency analysis based on the continuous severity function of the system. The study is performed on 4005 possible combinations of N – 2 contingency states for the practical Indian Utility 62 bus system. Static VAr Compensator is used to improve voltage profile during line contingencies. A multi- objective optimization with the objective of minimizing the voltage deviation and also the number of limit violating bus with optimal location and optimal sizing of SVC is achieved by Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

S.P. Mangaiyarkarasi
T. Sree Renga Raja
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This research presents a new technique which includes the principle of a Bezier curve and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) together, in order to design the planar dipole antenna for the two different targets. This technique can improve the characteristics of the antennas by modifying copper textures on the antennas with a Bezier curve. However, the time to process an algorithm will be increased due to the expansion of the solution space in optimization process. So as to solve this problem, the suitable initial parameters need to be set. Therefore this research initialized parameters with reference antenna parameters (a reference antenna operates on 2.4 GHz for IEEE 802.11 b/g/n WLAN standards) which resulted in the proposed designs, rapidly converted into the goals. The goal of the first design is to reduce the size of the antenna. As a result, the first antenna is reduced in the substrate size from areas of 5850 mm2 to 2987 mm2(48.93% approximately) and can also operates at 2.4 GHz (2.37 GHz to 2.51 GHz). The antenna with dual band application is presented in the second design. The second antenna is operated at 2.4 GHz (2.40 GHz to 2.49 GHz) and 5 GHz (5.10 GHz to 5.45 GHz) for IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n WLAN standards.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Nuttaka Homsup
Winyou Silabut
Vuttichai Kesornpatumanum
Pravit Boonek
Waroth Kuhirun
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper two different update schemes for the recently developed plug-in direct particle swarm repetitive controller (PDPSRC) are investigated and compared. The proposed approach employs the particle swarm optimizer (PSO) to solve in on-line mode a dynamic optimization problem (DOP) related to the control task in the constant-amplitude constant-frequency voltage-source inverter (CACF VSI) with an LC output filter. The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous update rules, both commonly used in static optimization problems (SOPs), is assessed and compared in the case of PDPSRC. The performance of the controller, when synthesized using each of the update schemes, is studied numerically.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bartlomiej Ufnalski
Lech M. Grzesiak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The demand for energy on a global scale increases day by day. Unlike renewable energy sources, fossil fuels have limited reserves and meet most of the world’s energy needs despite their adverse environmental effects. This study presents a new forecast strategy, including an optimization-based S-curve approach for coal consumption in Turkey. For this approach, Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) are among the meta-heuristic optimization techniques used to determine the optimum parameters of the S-curve. In addition, these algorithms and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) have also been used to estimate coal consumption. In evaluating coal consumption with ANN, energy and economic parameters such as installed capacity, gross generation, net electric consumption, import, export, and population energy are used for input parameters. In ANN modeling, the Feed Forward Multilayer Perceptron Network structure was used, and Levenberg-Marquardt Back Propagation has used to perform network training. S-curves have been calculated using optimization, and their performance in predicting coal consumption has been evaluated statistically. The findings reveal that the optimization-based S-curve approach gives higher accuracy than ANN in solving the presented problem. The statistical results calculated by the GWO have higher accuracy than the PSO, WOA, and GA with R 2 = 0.9881, RE = 0.011, RMSE = 1.079, MAE = 1.3584, and STD = 1.5187. The novelty of this study, the presented methodology does not need more input parameters for analysis. Therefore, it can be easily used with high accuracy to estimate coal consumption within other countries with an increasing trend in coal consumption, such as Turkey.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mustafa Seker
1
ORCID: ORCID
Neslihan Unal Kartal
2
Selin Karadirek
3
Cevdet Bertan Gulludag
3

  1. Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Turkey
  2. Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey
  3. Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The study aims to estimate metal foam microstructure parameters for the maximum sound absorption coefficient (SAC) in the specified frequency band to obtain optimum metal foam fabrication. Lu’s theory model is utilised to calculate the SAC of metallic foams that refers to three morphological parameters: porosity, pore size, and pore opening. After Lu model validation, particle swarm optimisation (PSO) is used to optimise the parameters. The optimum values are obtained at frequencies 250 to 8000 Hz, porosity of 50 to 95%, a pore size of 0.1 to 4.5 mm, and pore opening of 0.07 to 0.98 mm. The results revealed that at frequencies above 1000 Hz, the absorption efficiency increases due to changes in the porosity, pore size, and pore opening values rather than the thickness. However, for frequencies below 2000 Hz, increasing the absorption efficiency is strongly correlated with an increase in foam thickness. The PSO is successfully used to find optimum absorption conditions, the reference for absorbent fabrication, on a frequency band 250 to 8000 Hz. The outcomes will provide an efficient tool and guideline for optimum estimation of acoustic absorbents.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rohollah Fallah Madvari
1
Mohsen Niknam Sharak
2
Mahsa Jahandideh Tehrani
3
Milad Abbasi
4

  1. Occupational Health Research Center, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
  3. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
  4. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Due to the nonlinear current-voltage (I-V) relationship of the photovoltaic (PV) module, building a precise mathematical model of the PV module is necessary for evaluating and optimizing the PV systems. This paper proposes a method of building PV parameter estimation models based on golden jackal optimization (GJO). GJO is a recently developed algorithm inspired by the idea of the hunting behavior of golden jackals. The explored and exploited searching strategies of GJO are built based on searching for prey as well as harassing and grabbing prey of golden jackals. The performance of GJO is considered on the commercial KC200GT module under various levels of irradiance and temperature. Its performance is compared to well-known particle swarm optimization (PSO), recent Henry gas solubility optimization (HGSO) and some previous methods. The obtained results show that GJO can estimate unknown PV parameters with high precision. Furthermore, GJO can also provide better efficiency than PSO and HGSO in terms of statistical results over several runs. Thus, GJO can be a reliable algorithm for the PV parameter estimation problem under different environmental conditions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Thuan Thanh Nguyen
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, No. 12 Nguyen Van Bao, Ward 4, Go Vap District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents the resolution of the optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) problem and the control of voltages in an electrical energy system by using a hybrid algorithm based on the particle swarmoptimization (PSO) method and interior point method (IPM). The IPM is based on the logarithmic barrier (LB-IPM) technique while respecting the non-linear equality and inequality constraints. The particle swarmoptimization-logarithmic barrier-interior point method (PSO-LB-IPM) is used to adjust the control variables, namely the reactive powers, the generator voltages and the load controllers of the transformers, in order to ensure convergence towards a better solution with the probability of reaching the global optimum. The proposed method was first tested and validated on a two-variable mathematical function using MATLAB as a calculation and execution tool, and then it is applied to the ORPD problem to minimize the total active losses in an electrical energy network. To validate the method a testwas carried out on the IEEE electrical energy network of 57 buses.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aissa Benchabira
Mounir Khiat

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more