Humanities and Social Sciences

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN

Content

Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN | 2018 | Tom 13

Authors and Affiliations

Tadeusz Dola
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article discusses the concentration of Martin Luther’s theology on the Christian existence. There are three main areas pointing to this key idea. Firstly, the description of justification of the people in the categories of freedom gained through the experience of faith, which leads to a thankful service towards one’s neighbour. Secondly, sacramental understanding of the working of God’s Word as a performative that changes the world. It defines not only the understanding of the sacraments, with the key role of Baptism as a foundation for everyday actualisation of Christian life in penance, which strives for fighting off the sinfulness of an old, sinful man, and leads to building the man’s own justice based on the alien justice of Christ, but it is also the basis for the communion of believers – the church, as well as for the orders of creation, which structure the current reality. Thirdly, the remarks on theological knowledge closed in the triad prayer–meditation–temptation and theological weight of the experience of differentiating between the Law and the Gospel.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jerzy Sojka
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of the article is a critical presentation of Luther’s interpretation of Mt 5-7, with a special emphasis on its hermeneutical assumptions and anthropological consequences. At first the author presents the literary sources that contain Luther’s statements on Mt 5-7, i.e. his eminent hebdomadal speeches (Wochenpredigten) and some theological writings as well. Subsequently he discusses hermeneutical keys offered by M. Luther himself: the polemic against “double standard approach” (precepts and counsels) developed by the time of the Middle Ages and the polemic against the principles presented by the Anabaptist and other protestant idealists. However, the most significant factor of this interpretation was Luther’s teaching on two kingdoms (Zwei-Reichen-Lehre). The difference between the secular and spiritual kingdom is essential for Luther’s interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount (cf. WA 32, 299-301). The reformer claims that the message of the sermon is irrelevant for the Christian person in the world and it should be applied only to the Christian life in the Kingdom of God. M. Luther emphasizes also salvation by faith alone, therefore Matt. 5-7 has no soteriological value; it contains the ethical teaching of Jesus Christ. According to Luther the commandments of the Sermon on the Mount denote an impossible demand, therefore they are only a “mirror” of the Christian life. In the fourth step the author presents primary reactions of the Churches on Luther’s interpretation of the Sermon on the Mount. Luther’s interpretation of Mt 5-7 has its significant place in the history of exegesis and nowadays it remains still the standard evangelical standpoint.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stefan Szymik MSF
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Catholic image of Martin Luther in the course of the centuries evolved from the literally negative one during the time of the Reformation and the centuries that followed, through the theological attempts and historically in-depth analyses inspired by the ecumenical movement up to contemporary acceptance of several theological postulates. Contemporary movements of Roman-Catholic thinking of Luther well summarize historically vulnerable and dogmatically deepened opinions of the recent popes: John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis. Following the agreement texts of the Lutheran-Catholic Commission at the world forum, ecumenically open popes can find out in Martin Luther a profoundly religious man, the witness of the Gospel whose theological thought is still relevant and a challenge for the presently secularized world.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Jaskóła
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article, written on the 500th anniversary of the Reformation, focuses on the subsequent 100th anniversary of this event and the celebrations in a given historical context and in relation to the perception of the person of Martin Luther. Within 500 years of the memorable speech of the Reformation Father, which initiated the “Protestant reform” movement, at least every consecutive hundred years was celebrated as a special commemoration of this fact, which changed the course of European and World history and moved deeply into Christianity. The individual anniversary of the Reformation should therefore be considered in relation to social and political situation in Europe of that time, especially in Germany. It is no less important to draw attention to the figure of the founder of the Reformed Church, which has always focused, even today, on the celebration of the anniversary of the Reformation. The article presents the main themes of Martin Luther’s life in the context of his reform of Christianity and the basic ideas guiding his thoughts. Then, the development of the Reformation is analyzed, understood as the deepening of doctrine and the stabilization of practice, in the years after the death of the founder of the reform movement. Against this background, successive anniversaries of the Protestant reform are presented with regard to the religious and political situation in Europe and in the world, with particular emphasis on the last anniversary i.e. 500th anniversary of the Reformation and its perception in Protestant Churches as well as in the Catholic Church in the context of the development of the ecumenical movement.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Mikrut
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

”The 500th anniversary of the Reformation for the Orthodox Church is not a special reason for joy, because that was another division in the Church” – Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeyev) said. Although it concerned the relationship between Luther and the Western Church, its reference became the Orthodox Church, in which Luther sought primary teaching and ecclesiology. The proof of this was the Leipzig dispute, during which the primacy, liturgy, structure of the Church, the teaching of justification and purgatory, Luther confronted with the teaching of the Orthodox Church. If Luther saw in the Orthodox Church a framework for his reform, why did he not decide to convert to the Eastern Church? Karmires, emphasizing Luther’s great knowledge of the Orthodox Church, claims, however, that it had only a superficial character, lacking empirical knowledge. He also concludes that Luther neither wanted nor accepted Orthodoxy because of his affection to the mentality of the Western Church and to scholastic theology as well.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jerzy Pańkowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Although the Russian Orthodox Church participates in the activities of the ecumenical movement, it remains sceptical about the evolution of Western Christianity, mainly Protestantism. In particular, attempts to challenge traditional dogmatic and ethical formulations are unacceptable. The Russian Orthodox criticism goes even further when it reveals the sources of the rejection of church tradition in early Protestant theology. In this context, the article presents the main elements of the contemporary Russian Orthodox critique of the Reformation’s rejection of tradition as an authoritative source of Christian faith. The first part outlines the theological and ideological specificity of the Russian Orthodox discourse on the Reformation. The second part presents the Orthodox concept of the authority of tradition in the Church as a starting point for the criticism of the Reformation. The third part discusses the main elements of the criticism of the reformatory concept of sola Scriptura with particular emphasis on its socio-political reasons and consequences.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Składanowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents Martin Luther’s teaching on justification in the context of its soteriological and anthropological consequences, which at least on the verbal level are defined by the terms imputatio and deificatio. The basic presentation of the main aspects of this teaching is preceded by an outline of the historical background of its formation, where both the dispute over indulgences and the mystical inspirations of Luther’s theology played a significant role. The Wittenberg Reformer comprehended justification both as attributing to the believer the righteousness of Christ and as a close union with Him. This unity, whose image is marriage, consists in the commercium sacrum between man and Christ. The participation of a believer in the righteousness of Christ manifests itself as a kind of “transition” into Christ. In this sense, the existence of the justified person becomes an “ecstatic” existence, extra se, that is in God, resulting as a new – divinized (vergottet) – life.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rajmund Porada
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper outlines the Catholic and the Evangelical standpoint on the primate’s function served by the Bishop of Rome and its origin. The controversy revolves around the key phrase, iure divino and iure humano, which points to the divine or human origin of the primacy. In the Catholic perspective, Jesus Christ brought the Church into existence and provided this institution with permanent structural elements: primacy and apostolate. This thesis, considered an imperative of faith, is based on the texts of the Gospel which underscore the primacy of Saint Peter the Apostle among the Twelve and in the early Church. According to the Catholic ecclesiology, it was not only a private privilege enjoyed by Peter but a permanent element of the structure of the Church, which received the formal status of a dogma at the First Vatican Council. From the outset, the Reformation has assumed that primacy is an element shaped in the course of the historical development of the Church. The ecumenical dialogue between Catholicism and Lutheranism led to the establishment of a standpoint veering towards the consideration of the origin of primacy as a matter of lesser consequence. This step was taken in order to underscore the communal dimension of the Church, with its important function in unifying Christianity and presenting it to the world. The basic premise giving credence to this function is its foundation in the Gospel.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Żmudziński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper’s authors undertake the reflection on the stages of the evolution of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s views on the Church and its role as it is played in the lives of its singular members and in the context of the Reformation’s ethical heritage. One can distinguish among three stages of the Bonhoefferian ecclesiology, deepening his vision of the Church. As far as the first one is considered, the Church is defined as the spiritual community of believers, outside of which salvation is impossible. At the second stage the German theologian accentuates the sinfulness of man as a member of the Church. Its recognition constitutes the basis for the transformation that can take place in the human individual due to accepting Christ into oneself. The third stage is stepping into the world of „before-final” matters in the full responsibility for the choices made by particular members of the ecclesial community. The Church, as Bonhoeffer saw it, was supposed to support itself on strong pillars: on freedom, personal responsibility, imitating Christ, neighbourly love, on sacraments and Gospel. In this aspect Bonhoeffer was the faithful continuator of the Reformation program.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Hintz
Maria Urbańska-Bożek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The author in his article deals with the role that Mary of Nazareth, the mother of Messiah, the Gebirah, played in the economy of salvation. The title Gebirah means the dignity of the king’s mother and the special power of her influence. Therefore, the Books of Kings almost always mention the name of the king’s mother by introducing the description of each Judah ruler from the Davidic dynasty from which the Messiah was born. The dignity of Gebirah was given to the king’s mother at the time of her son’s enthronement. The king’s mother received the prestigious title of Gebirah (2 Kings 5:3; Jer 13:18), because she gave birth to her son (geber), who became king (2 Sam 23:1). They mention three texts of the Bible about the mother of the Messiah, depicting an important figure of a mother’s role (Genesis 3:15; Jes 7:14 and Mich 5:2). Both the figure of the king and his mother prefigure the Messianic King Jesus (2 Sam 7:10-17) and his mother Mary. Mary, the Mother of Jesus, considered to be a messianic personification of the entire people of Israel, becomes the new Daughter of Zion. Mary as the messianic Gebirah is actually the Mother of the Church.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Gabriel Witaszek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the submitted study, the author shows that Paul in the propositio (12,1-2) the section of encouragement (12,3-15,13), although he does not use the word syneidēsis directly, but the words used in it refer to him in conjunction with his basic functions and prove in this way how fundamental it is to renew the mind in the right, i.e. salvifically effective, education of Christian conscience. He does so in the encouragement context to make the recipients aware of how important it is to have a renewed mind and conscience in being and continuing to become a Christian in everyday and concrete living as well as practicing faith in Jesus. With propositio, he makes the foundation on which he builds the paraclesical message of the Letter. It clearly states that permanently renewed by the Gospel of God mind, is an absolute condition for an uninterrupted evangelical renewal of conscience. Thus, renewed in this way conscience is the only deity of mercy granted to sinful humanity, which guarantees constant faithfulness to its norms of judgment with God’s justice revealed in Christ, the Son of God, or his absolute righteousness, which is an indispensable condition for achieving eternal salvation.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zdzisław Żywica
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The influence of St. Augustine on the development of western latin theological thinking is significant. In many ways, he also influenced thinking of counter-reformation and reformation theologians, mainly Martin Luther. Martin Luther quotes the passage of the 80th homily on the Gospel of John in the third paragraph of the Smalcald Articles. Therefore, it is certain that Augustine influenced the understanding of baptism, mainly the relation between faith and word during administration of the sacrament of baptism. The aim of our study is to offer theological analysis of the 80th homily on the Gospel of John mentioned above in the context of Augustine´s thinking. It is a short dictated text written by the theologian of Hippo in 419-423 where he explains the Gospel of John 15, 1-5 word by word. Reformation, counter-reformation and post-Trentian theologians used to refer to the third paragraph of the 80th homily too often and their interpretation was influenced by their position, whether they were on the side of Catholics or Protestants. It is interesting that although the text was often quoted, there were only several studies that dealt with it in a professional way. Augustine´s homily reflects the spiritual wealth of the battle with donatism (the role of administrator and recipient of the sacrament of baptism) and pelagianism (baptism of children). In this study, we point to the fact that it is a commentary on the Sacred Scripture, therefore we analyse the homily as a whole. The study also includes the first complete translation of the homily into Slovak language.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Miloš Lichner
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The subject matter dealt with in this article fits into a broader discussion on sovereignty and patriotism, which has intensified since Poland’s accession to the European Union. It is also associated with the topical issue of patriotic education of children and adolescents, in which the Church engages along with the family and the school (e.g. as part of religion lessons, parochial catechesis, specialist pastoral work). When taking up the subject matter described in the title, the author first focused on whether now, in a changed historical context, speaking about patriotism and patriotic attitudes is still sensible and whether a Christian can (should) be a patriot. When seeking an answer to this question, a reference was made mainly to the Letter of the Polish Episcopate On Christian Patriotism, issued on the 200th anniversary of the first partition of Poland, and to the document of the Conference of the Polish Episcopate prepared by the Council for Social Matters, entitled The Christian Shape of Patriotism. It was against this background that an answer was sought to the question about patriotic content in homilies and catechesis. Homilies delivered by St. John Paul II during his pilgrimages to his homeland were used as a model in this regard. The basic assumptions of the religion teaching syllabus for schools and parochial catechesis, which refer at multiple points to patriotism as a value, emphasising the importance of developing an attitude of respect and love for one’s homeland and its cultural heritage, as well as a motivation to actively participate in social life, were also discussed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Edward Wiszowaty
Anna Zellma

Instructions for authors

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

Before you submit your article, review or report for publication in the journal Studies in Theological Sciences, please read the requirements for authors of texts.

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TEXT TO BE SUBMITTED AND HOW IT SHOULD BE EDITED

RULES FOR PREPARING FOOTNOTES
PRINCIPLES OF EDITING APPENDIX BIBLIOGRAPHY
RULES FOR REDACTING SUMMARY AND KEY WORDS
PRINCIPLES OF EDITING A BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE

If the text of the article (review, report) has been edited in accordance with the rules adopted by the editorial board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences", please register/log in at the following address: https://www.editorialsystem.com/snt and then follow the instructions on the page.

Authors can follow the text qualification process on their account on the Editorial System Platform (link as above).

In all matters related to the publication of the text, you can contact the editorial office of Studies in Theological Sciences: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → CONTACT

Publication Ethics Policy

PRINCIPLES OF PUBLISHING ETHICS
that the editors of "Studies in Theological Sciences" apply, are in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE – Committee on Publication Ethics):

According to these guidelines, not only the authors, but all those involved in the publication process are required to respect ethical standards in the publication of the article.

1. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE AUTHOR

Authorship of publications: The author of a publication is the person who made a significant contribution to its conception, execution and final interpretation of the data. Anyone who influenced these elements of the work should be listed among the authors.
Scientific integrity: The publication should be prepared meticulously according to the guidelines of the Editorial Board. It must contain data to identify sources and a clear, transparent presentation of information. The bibliography should present all publications used in writing the article.
Originality and plagiarism: the author is obliged to conduct, present and interpret scientific research honestly and objectively. The author may submit only his own and original work for publication. Submission of an article for publication is understood as a declaration that the text has not been published anywhere before, including in electronic form, and that it is not submitted to the editorial boards of other journals or is not an excerpt from a compact publication, such as a monograph (the rule of exclusion of multiple or simultaneous publication). Plagiarism, self-plagiarism or falsification of data in a scientific article is unacceptable. The editors use the iThenticate anti-plagiarism program to check the originality of texts submitted for publication http://www.ithenticate.com/ Information about errors in published texts: The author should immediately notify the editor-in-chief of the journal if he notices significant errors in his publication. In cooperation with the editor-in-chief and the publisher, an errata, an addendum, a correction should be published or the publication should be withdrawn.

2. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO EDITORS

Monitoring of ethical standards: The editors are responsible for adhering to the highest ethical standards of the journal's publication process. To this end, it keeps a constant check on all activities at every stage of publication, and prevents abuses if necessary.

Transparency and openness (principle fair play): Submitted articles are evaluated by the Editorial Board only on their merits. The evaluation is not affected by such factors as race, sex, religion, origin, citizenship, political views of the authors, etc.

Publication decisions: The editors, after reviewing the reviews, make the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. In making its decision, it takes into account such factors as the scientific value of the paper, the originality of the treatment of the problem, clarity and compliance with the scope of the journal.

Principle of confidentiality: The editors are obliged to maintain confidentiality with regard to data on papers submitted for publication and their authors. Only the author, reviewers (with a double blind review procedure in place), the editor-in-chief, the editor in charge of the issue or responsible for the article, and the publisher have information about the article.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Articles not intended for publication may not be used by the editors in any way and for any purpose that infringes the author's intellectual property. Authors should inform the Editor about the sources of funding for publication, contributions from scientific research institutions, associations and other entities (financial disclosure).

Scientific integrity: The editors are responsible for the ethical and substantive level of the journal and therefore have the right to verify the data in the submitted article and make corrections, if necessary.

A barrage ghost writing i guest autorship: The Editorial Board conducts the selection of submitted articles in accordance with the principles of preventing cases of scientific dishonesty, such as ghost authorship, courtesy authorship, guest authorship, etc. In order to counteract similar cases, the Editorial Board requires authors to present the authors' contribution to the publication (with additional affiliation and attribution of authorship to different parts of the publication); the main responsibility for the content lies with the author submitting the article.

Text withdrawal: In the case of suspected fraudulent practices, the Editorial Board is obliged to withdraw the text from publication and take clarification and corrective steps. Detection of ethical malpractice (plagiarism, falsification of research results, manipulation of research results, method, fabrication of research results, etc.) should be reported in writing to the editor-in-chief of the journal ( marian.machinek@gmail.com) or to the secretary of the journal (agatarujner@gmail.com). A report can be made by a member of the editorial board, a reviewer, a reader of the journal or any other person who has suspicions about the integrity of the text. In the case of an ethical violation in a text already published, the editors will withdraw the article from the website, posting information about the reasons for the withdrawal, and in the case of a printed text, the editors will include an appropriate statement in the next issue of the journal. The editors will inform the author, the affiliated institution, the reviewers, the aggrieved persons, and, if necessary, other ethical regulators of the case. If the ethical malpractice in the text is insignificant, the corrected text will be allowed to be republished. If there is a conflict of interest within the Editorial Board, a report should be submitted to the Publisher ( sekretariat@akademiakatolicka.pl).

Complaints and appeals: Complaints against the Journal and/or the Editorial Board should be in writing and, when they concern the Journal or the conduct of members of the Editorial Board, they should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief; when they concern the conduct of the Editor-in-Chief, they should be addressed to the Publisher - the Committee on Theological Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences ( sekretariat@akademiakatolicka.pl) and brought to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief. Supervision of the Publisher is exercised by the Dean of the Division I of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences ( wydzial_1@pan.pl). The subject of the complaint may be, for example: violated interests of the complainant, negligence, protraction or inaction in the case by the Editorial Board. The complainant should receive written notification of the handling of the case within 30 days from the date of the complaint.

3. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES APPLICABLE TO THE REVIEWER

Text evaluation criteria: The reviewer assesses the compatibility of the subject matter covered with the profile of the journal, whether the title reflects the content of the article, and whether the article is an original text. The reviewer evaluates the article in terms of form (linguistic correctness, structure of the argument, correctness in the formulation of footnotes) and content (methodological correctness, completeness of the theses presented, factual correctness, timeliness of the bibliography used). The reviewer should briefly justify his assessment. The review must contain a clear conclusion including a recommendation for publication of the article.

Principle of confidentiality: The reviewer is obliged to treat the reviewed article as a confidential document. He can inform only those authorized to do so about it. The review procedure is done anonymously, which means that the author and reviewers do not know each other's identity (double blind review).

The principle of objectivity: The reviewer pays attention only to the merits of the publication. He does not judge or criticize the author. In the review he tries to be objective. He presents the evaluation of the article with clear arguments.

The principle of responsibility for the timeliness of the review process: A reviewer who agrees to review an article is responsible for completing his or her work by the deadline agreed upon with the Editor.

Exclusion of conflicts of interest: Conflicts of interest may be relationships of professional subordination, economic dependence, and such forms of social relations that may affect the impartial evaluation of the value of the text. All information and scientific concepts obtained as a result of the review procedure may not be used for the personal benefit of the reviewer. The reviewer may not be a person directly involved in the creation of the publication.

Peer-review Procedure

REVIEW PROCEDURE

The review procedure used in the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" is in accordance with the recommendations of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education contained in the publication Good practices in review procedures in science, Warsaw 2011 and the Announcement of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of June 2, 2015 on the criteria and procedure for evaluating scientific journals.

Before agreeing to write a review, the reviewer should familiarize himself/herself with the PRINCIPLES OF ETHICS FOR REVIEWERS: https://journals.pan.pl/snt → PRINCIPLES OF PUBLICATION ETHICS.

Upon receipt of an article destined for the ARTICLES or VARIA sections, the Editorial Board performs a preliminary evaluation of the text submitted by the author, leading to a decision to accept it for further processing (or reject it). The author may also be asked to fill in missing data in his submission. After the decision to pre-qualify the submitted article, the Editorial Board initiates the review procedure, sending the text to two independent reviewers, of which it immediately notifies the author.

The list of reviewers is not fixed, but the Editor appoints them depending on the subject matter of the texts sent. As a result, the reviewers are experts on the subject of the submitted text. The review process is anonymous, the reviewer and the author of the article do not know each other's identities (the so-called double blind review).

Accepting the text for review, the reviewer undertakes to complete it by the specified deadline. After reviewing the text of the submitted article, the reviewer fills out a review form, assessing the article both from the formal (structure, language, style, footnotes) and substantive (correctness of the argumentation, originality and completeness of the thesis) side.

The reviewer should justify his assessment and make any recommendations to the author. The review should contain a clear conclusion in the form of a recommendation to accept, reject or send the text back to the author for corrections and additions. Two reviews with a negative recommendation lead to rejection of the article. In the case of significant discrepancies in the recommendations of the first two reviewers, the Editor refers the text to a third reviewer, whose recommendation is decisive for the further fate of the article.

On the basis of the review, the Editorial Board decides whether to finally accept the article for publication, reject it or send it back to the author for corrections. The Editorial Board immediately informs the author of the decision, giving him the opportunity to read the review texts as well. To the more serious comments of reviewers, the author of the article should respond in detail. All comments of reviewers should be taken into account in the correction of the work. Correspondence between the author and reviewers is carried out through the Editor.

In consultation with the author, the Editorial Board performs stylistic proofreading of the text of the accepted article, with the aim of eventually producing a version of the text ready for publication.

The materials contained in the REVIEWS AND REVIEWS section are not strictly scientific articles and therefore, as a rule, are not subject to the evaluation of external reviewers, although they may be referred to them. The decision to publish or reject them is made by the Editorial Board.

Reviewers

REVIEWERS


19 (2024)

Ks. prof. dr Piotr Adamek, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan
Ks. prof. UŚ dr hab. Antoni Bartoszek, Uniwersytet Śląski
Ks. prof. UŚ dr hab. Bogdan Biela, Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Prof. dr hab. Jacek Błeszyński, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Prof. dr hab. Janusz Bujak, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Ks. prof. US dr hab. Grzegorz Chojnacki, Uniwersytet Szczeciński
Ks. prof. dr Zbigniew Formela, Università Pontificia Salesiana in Rome Italy
Prof. UPS dr hab. Sylwia Góra, Uniwersytet Pomorski w Słupsku
Ks. prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Góźdź, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. dr Janusz Kowalczyk, Pontificia Università Gregoriana in Rome, Italy
Ks. prof. dr hab. Janusz Kucicki, Nagoya University, Japan
. prof. dr hab. Zdzisław Kupisiński, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. KUL dr hab. Janusz Lekan, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie
Ks. prof. dr hab. Wiesław Łużyński, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Ks. prof. UAM dr hab. Maciej Olczyk, Uniwersytet im Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Ks. doc. dr Marcel Mojzeš, Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, Slovakia
Ks. prof. dr hab. Jan Perszon, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Ks. prof. UO dr hab. Janusz Podzielny, Uniwersytet Opolski w Opolu
. prof. PWT dr hab. Roman Słupek, Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu
Ks. prof. dr Innocenzo-Mária Vladimír Szaniszló, Pontificia Università di San Tommaso d’Aquino (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
. prof. dr Peter Volek, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Ks. prof. KUL. dr hab. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II w Lublinie

18 (2023)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Barth, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dola, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Maurizio Faggioni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Radoslav Lojan, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Merecki SDS, The Pontifical Theological Institute John Paul II for Marriage and the Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, Holy Cross College, South Bend, USA
Prof. Stanisław Jan Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Marek Rembierz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Skobel, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Robert Skrzypczak, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College & Seminary, Cromwell, USA
Prof. Stefano Zamboni, Accademia Alfonsiana in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Zawadzki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

17 (2022)

Prof. Przemysław Artemiuk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Paweł Borto, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland Prof. Martin Carbajo-Núñez, Pontifical University of St. Anthony (Antonianum), Rome, Italy
Prof. David Fagerberg, University of Notre Dame, USA
Prof. Bogdan Ferdek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Cristiana Freni, Salesian Pontifical University, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zygfryd Paweł Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Guzowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Marek Kluz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Vlaho Kovačević, University of Split, Croatia
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Miotk SVD, Rome, Italy
Prof. Andrzej Adam Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Piotr Piasecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Jan Polak, Palacký, University Olomouc, Czech Republic
Prof. Adrian J. Reimers, University of Saint Thomas, USA
Prof. Roman Słupek SDS, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Adam Józef Sobczyk, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrea Vicini SJ, Boston College, USA
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Ray Zammit, L-Università ta' Malta, Malta

16 (2021)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Aszyk, Catholic Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Bohdanowicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Janusz Bujak, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Piotr Duchliński, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ivo Džinić, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Prof. Zygfryd Glaeser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Daniel Justel, Universidad Eclesiástica San Dámaso: Madrid, Spain
Prof. Stephan Kampowski, Pontifical John Paul II Theological Institute for Marriage and Family Sciences in Rome, Italy
Prof. Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontifical University of. St. Anthony (Antonianum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
PhD Roman Mazur, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Paweł Podeszwa, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Proniewski, University of Bialystok, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Thomas Rego, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Chile
Prof. Adrian Reimers, University of St. Thomas, USA
Prof. Czesław Rychlicki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Siemieniec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. med. Władysław Sinkiewicz, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Poland
Prof. Damian Wąsek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. João J. Vila-Chã, Pontifical Gregorian University (Gregoriana) in Rome, Italy
PhD Tadeusz Zadorożny, Holy Apostles College and Seminary, USA

15 (2020)

Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland PhD René Balák, Slovakia
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Paweł Bortkiewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ladislav Csontos, Trnava University, Slovakia
Prof. Grzegorz Chojnacki, University of Szczecin, Poland
Prof. Ján Ďačok, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. John Grabowski, Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Collegium Bobolanum in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. René Micallef, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Ireneusz Mroczkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Kazimierz Papciak, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Ian Randall, Cambridge, UK
Prof. Jarosław Różański, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Tomasz Szyszka, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, Italy
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
PhD Dominic White, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
PhD Agnes Wilkins, Worcester, UK
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Krzysztof Penderecki Academy of Music in Krakow, Poland

14 (2019)

Prof. Grzegorz Bachanek, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. James Corkery, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tomasz Dutkiewicz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zygfryd Gläser, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. John Grabowski, The Catholic University of America in Washington, USA
Prof. Adam Kalbarczyk, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ewelina Konieczna, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Kozłowski, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Jarosław Merecki, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Napiórkowski, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Józef Naumowicz, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pryba, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Inocent-Mária V. Szaniszló, Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome, Italy
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wodka, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy

13 (2018)

PhD José María Berlanga, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain
Prof. Roman Buchta, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Joseph Carola, Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome, Italy
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Wiesław Dąbrowski, Istituto Superiore di Scienze Religiose „Fides et Ratio”, L`Aquila, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Cyril Hišem, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Slovakia
Prof. Cayetana Heidi Johnson - Universidad en Internet de México, Mexico
Prof. Przemysław Kantyka, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Kałużny, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
PhD Maksym Adam Kopiec, Pontificia Universita Antonianum, Rome, Italy
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Rudolf Kutschera, John Felice Rome Center/Loyola University Chicago, Rome, Italy
Prof. Krzysztof Leśniewski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Linke, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jarosław Moskałyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Pawłowski, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Romuald Piekarski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Aleksander Prokopski, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
PhD Paweł Sambor, l'Institut Catholique de Paris, France
Prof. Roman Słupek, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Manfred Uglorz, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

12 (2017)

PhD Mojżesz Asaah Awinongya SVD, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule in Sankt Augustin, Germany
Prof. Antoni Bartoszek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Achim Buckenmaier, Pontifical Lateran University, Rome, Italy
PhD Andrzej Dobrzyński, Center for Documentation and Research of the Pontificate of John Paul II in Rome, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Józef Grzywaczewski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Krzemiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Ledwoń, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Francisco José López Sáez, Universidad Pontificia Comillas in Madrid, Spain.
Prof. Michael J. Mikoś, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, USA
Prof. Leszek Misiarczyk, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mieczysław Ozorowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ignacio Serrada Sotil, Instituto Superior de Ciencias Religiosas, Spain
Prof. Krzysztof Stachewicz, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Ralph Weimann, Domuni Universitas, Bruksela, Belgium
Prof. Krzysztof Wieczorek, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Wierciński, University of Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec, Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland

11 (2016)

PhD Anna Abram, Margaret Beaufort Institute of Theology in Cambridge, UK
Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
PhD Stanisław Bazyliński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Radosław Chałupniak, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Konrad Glombik, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Massimo Grilli, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Marek Karczewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Witold Kawecki, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Wolfgang Klausnitzer, Julius-Maximilians-Universität of Würzburg, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
PhD Edmund Kowalski, Accademia Alfonsiana, Rome, Italy
Prof. Zbigniew Kubacki, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Myszor, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Janusz Kręcidło, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Obirek PhD Sean Ryan, University of London, UK
Prof. Jan Słomka, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
PhD Wojciech M. Stabryła, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Szpet, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Mariusz Szram, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Uciecha, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland

10 (2015)

Prof. Tadeusz Dzidek, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Sławomir Zieliński, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Hajduk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Edward Wiszowaty, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Cristian Sonea, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Wojciech Szukalski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jürgen Werbick, Universität Münster, Germany
Prof. Jacek Kempa, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Michael Gabel, Universität Erfurt, Germany
Prof. Wojciech Gajewski, University of Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Ryszard Sikora, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Kotecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Roman Siebenrock, Universität Innsbruck, Austria Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Michał Wojciechowski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland Prof. Stanisław Rabiej, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Prof. Paweł Kiejkowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jan Perszon, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Józef Urban, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Pietrzak, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jan Górski, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Prof. Bogusław Kochaniewicz OP, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland Prof. Artur Malina, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Piotr Perzyński, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland

9 (2014)

Prof. Stanisław Achremczyk, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Józef Bunar, Facultad de Teología “San Pablo”, Cochabamba, Bolivia
Prof. Stefan Iloaie, Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marcin Hintz , Christian Theological Academy in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Alberto Mingo Kaminouchi, Institute Superior de Ciencias Morales, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Krystian Kałuża, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Kaucha, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jacek Kiciński, Pontifical Faculty of Theology in Wrocław, Poland
Prof. Marek Kita, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Stanisław Kozakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Marek Lis, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Jacenty Mastej, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
PhD Gerhard Marschütz, Universität Wien, Austria Prof. Erwin Mateja, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz , University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piepke, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule SVD St. Augustin, Germany
Prof. Dariusz Piwowarczyk, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland Prof. Roland Preis
Prof. Marek Pyc, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Marek Skierkowski, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Prof. Stefan Szymik, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zbigniew Wanat, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Wiśniewski, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Włodzimierz Wołyniec - Ateneo Romano della Santa Croce, Italy

8 (2013)

Prof. Roman Bogacz, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Clemens Breuer, Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule St. Pölten, Austria
Prof. Jacek Bramorski, Stanisław Moniuszko Academy of Music in Gdańsk, Poland
Prof. Dariusz Dziadosz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Wacław Gubała, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jan Kochel, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Łabuda, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Janiec, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Prof. Bernard Kołodziej, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Krzysztof Konecki, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland
Prof. Antoni Misiaszek, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Misiurek, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Maciej Olczyk, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Joachim Piegsa, Universität Augsburg, Germany
Prof. Marek Raczkiewicz, Accademia Pontificio, Madrid, Spain
Prof. Ireneusz Werbiński, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
Prof. Waldemar Wesoły, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Norbert Widok, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Tadeusz Zadykowicz, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland

6-7 (2011-2012)

Prof. Piotr Morciniec, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Krystian Wojaczek, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Piotr Jaskóła, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Andrzej Anderwald, University of Opole, Poland
Prof. Katarzyna Parzych-Blakiewicz, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
Prof. Jan Orzeszyna, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland
Prof. Jerzy Gocko, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Prof. Zdzisław Kupisiński, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland


Plagiarism Policy

ANTI-PLAGIARISM POLICY

Anti-plagiarism system: Plagiarism is an infringement of personal copyright by appropriating all or part of another's work and publishing it under one's own name. Copying one's own work to expand one's academic output constitutes self-plagiarism. Plagiarism is a criminal act.

If plagiarism is detected, the editors will inform the institution where the author is affiliated, the reviewers and the affected persons of the case.In addition, the editors will post information on this issue on the journal's website and/or in the printed version.

In order to prevent plagiarism, the Editorial Board of the journal "Studies in Theological Sciences" uses iThenticate software belonging to Turnitin, a global provider of technology services for science and education. The system allows checking the alleged similarity of a text with billions of online sources and texts deposited by publishers using Similarity Check.

Research data: The editors do not collect research data, and submission of a research data management plan is not a requirement for publication of an article. By research data, the editors mean recorded material of a factual nature (in numerical, textual, graphical or audio form) that is generally recognized by the scientific community as necessary for evaluating the results of scientific research. Under certain circumstances, however, authors may be asked to provide research data, even after the article has been published.

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more